managementranepaУправленческое консультированиеAdministrative Consulting1726-11391816-8590Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-68-82managementranepa-1468Research ArticleАКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ СОВРЕМЕННОЙ СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ: ОПЫТ РОССИИ И КИТАЯTOPICAL ISSUES OF MODERN SOCIAL POLICY: EXPERIENCE OF RUSSIA AND CHINAComparison of Old-age Pension Policy in China and Russia: the Common and the SpecificComparison of Old-age Pension Policy in China and Russia: the Common and the SpecificЧэньТяньхунChenTianhong

Чэнь Тяньхун, доцент Гуандунского Института государственного управления, доктор менеджмента

Гуанчжоу

Chen Tianhong, Associate Professor of Guangdong Institute of Public Administration, doctor of management

Guangzhou

chentianhong2006@163.comГуандунский Институт государственного управленияКитайGuangdong Institute of Public AdministrationChina202009092020076882Copyright © Чэнь Т., 20202020Чэнь Т.Chen T.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1468

.

In the process of transforming from planned economy to market economy, both China and Russia faced the issue of pension reform. There are similarities in the reform and development process and the system model of the pension security system in China and Russia. Transition from planned economy to market economy and aggravation of population aging are main reasons for the reform of pension system in both countries. Under the influence of the World Bank and other international organizations, China and Russia have gradually established a multi-tier pension system, with the state, enterprises and individuals sharing the pension costs. Differences also exist in the old-age security system of China and Russia.

Old-age PensionChinaRussiaComparisonThis paper is funded by Research on Multi-tier Old-age Insurance System in Guangdong Province, project of Guangdong Institute of Public Administration in 2018 (project number: XYYB201808).ReferencesTianhong Chen, John Turner. Fragmentation in Social Security Old-Age Benefit Provision in China. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 2015 (2). P. 107–122. (in English)Tianhong Chen, John Turner. Fragmentation in Social Security Old-Age Benefit Provision in China. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 2015 (2). P. 107–122. (in English)Tianhong Chen, John Turner. Extending social security coverage to the rural sector in China. International Social Security Review, 2014 (67). P. 49–70. (in English)Tianhong Chen, John Turner. Extending social security coverage to the rural sector in China. International Social Security Review, 2014 (67). P. 49–70. (in English)The World Bank, Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, Oxford University Press, 1994. (in English)The World Bank, Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, Oxford University Press, 1994. (in English)The World Bank, Old Age Income Support in the 21 st Century: an International Perspective on Pension System and Reform, World Bank, 2005. (in English)The World Bank, Old Age Income Support in the 21 st Century: an International Perspective on Pension System and Reform, World Bank, 2005. (in English)Chen Yun-ying, He Fang. Russia’s Pension System Reform in 2018 under the Current Russian-Economic Background. Northeast Asia Economic Research, 2019 (4). P. 109–120. (in Chinese)Chen Yun-ying, He Fang. Russia’s Pension System Reform in 2018 under the Current Russian-Economic Background. Northeast Asia Economic Research, 2019 (4). P. 109–120. (in Chinese)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.