managementranepaУправленческое консультированиеAdministrative Consulting1726-11391816-8590Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.10.22394/1726-1139-2021-8-65-70managementranepa-1638Research ArticleОБЩЕСТВО И РЕФОРМЫSOCIETY AND REFORMSГлобальные изменения в высшем образовании: постковидное времяGlobal Changes in Higher Education: Post-Covid Timeshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-3633БайерЮ. П.BayerJ. P.

Байер Юлия Паулевна, директор образовательных программ «Социальная работа» и «Социология», доцент кафедры социальных технологий, кандидат социологических наук

Санкт-Петербург

Julia P. Bayer, Head of “Sociology” and “Social work” programmes, Associate Professor, PhD in Sociology

St. Petersburg

bayer-yp@ranepa.ruЧураевН. А.ChuraevN. A.

Чураев Никита Антонович, ведущий специалист отдела развития программ и проектов в сфере профессионального образования

Санкт-Петербург

Nikita A. Churaev, Chief specialist of the Department of Development of Programs and Projects in the Field of Vocational Education

St. Petersburg

nikitazch@yandex.ruРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации (Северо-Западный институт управления РАНХиГС)Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)Комитет по науке и высшей школе Правительства Санкт-ПетербургаCommittee for Science and Higher Education of the Government of Saint-Petersburg202103092021086570Copyright © Байер Ю.П., Чураев Н.А., 20212021Байер Ю.П., Чураев Н.А.Bayer J.P., Churaev N.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1638

В этой статье мы говорим об образовании как о глобальном феномене, включающем множество акторов со своими политическими интересами. В этой связи крайне остро встает вопрос об антропологической составляющей современного образования, в том числе в международном контексте: какого человека формирует новое глобальное образование, к кому оно применяется и какие ценности оно формирует. Определяем основные направления глобальной образовательной политики. Формирование глобальной образовательной политики еще не завершено, и пандемия коронавирусной инфекции принесла как положительные, так и отрицательные аспекты в образование. Мы рассматриваем и преимущества, и недостатки пандемической ситуации, которая перевела мировое высшее образование в другой формат. Также мы делаем прогноз по дальнейшему развитию высшего образования.

In this article we talk about education as a global phenomenon that includes many actors with their own political interests. In this regard, the question of the anthropological component of modern education, including in the international context, arises extremely sharply: what kind of person is formed by the new global education, to whom it applies, and what values it forms. Main trends in global education policy are defined. The formation of a global educational policy has not yet been completed, and the pandemic of coronavirus infection has brought both positive and negative aspects. We name both of them: the advantages and disadvantages of pandemic situation that shifted the global higher education into the different format. Also, we make the forecast on further higher education development.

глобальная образовательная политика (ГОП)пандемияцифровизация образованиягражданин мираglobal education policy (GEP)pandemicdigitalization of educationcitizen of the worldReferencesBall S. J. (2012). Global education inc. London: Routledge., Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.Ball S. J. (2012). Global education inc. London: Routledge., Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.Bieber T. (2010), ‘Playing the Multilevel Game in Education-the PISA Study and the Bologna Process Triggering Swiss Harmonisation’, in K. Martens, A. Nagel, M. Windzio and A. Weymann (eds), Transformation of Education Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105–131.Bieber T. (2010), ‘Playing the Multilevel Game in Education-the PISA Study and the Bologna Process Triggering Swiss Harmonisation’, in K. Martens, A. Nagel, M. Windzio and A. Weymann (eds), Transformation of Education Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105–131.Green A. (2003), ‘Education, Globalisation and the Role of Comparative Research’. London Review of Education, 1, (2), 84–97.Green A. (2003), ‘Education, Globalisation and the Role of Comparative Research’. London Review of Education, 1, (2), 84–97.Lingard B., & Rawolle S. (2011). New scalar politics: Implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47, 489–502.Lingard B., & Rawolle S. (2011). New scalar politics: Implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47, 489–502.Lingard B., Rawolle S. and Taylor S. (2005), ‘Globalising policy sociology in education: working with Bourdieu’. Journal of Education Policy, 20, (6), 759–777.Lingard B., Rawolle S. and Taylor S. (2005), ‘Globalising policy sociology in education: working with Bourdieu’. Journal of Education Policy, 20, (6), 759–777.Martens K. and Wolf K. D. (2009), ‘Boomerangs and Trojan Horses: The Unintended Consequences of Internationalising Education Policy Through the EU and the OECD’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, and P. Maassen (eds), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 81–107.Martens K. and Wolf K. D. (2009), ‘Boomerangs and Trojan Horses: The Unintended Consequences of Internationalising Education Policy Through the EU and the OECD’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, and P. Maassen (eds), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 81–107.Martens K., Nagel A., Windzio M. and Weymann A. (2010), Transformation of Education Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Martens K., Nagel A., Windzio M. and Weymann A. (2010), Transformation of Education Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Mundy K. (1998), ‘Educational Multilateralism and World (Dis)Order’. Comparative Education Review, 42, (4), 448–478.Mundy K. (1998), ‘Educational Multilateralism and World (Dis)Order’. Comparative Education Review, 42, (4), 448–478.Mundy K. (1999), ‘Educational multilateralism in a changing world order: UNESCO and the limits of the possible’. Journal of Education Development, 19, (1), 27–52.Mundy K. (1999), ‘Educational multilateralism in a changing world order: UNESCO and the limits of the possible’. Journal of Education Development, 19, (1), 27–52.Mundy K. and Menashy F. (2011), ‘Varieties of Organized Hypocrisy: The Case of the World Bank and Private Provision of Education’, paper presented to Workshop ‘Studying International Organisations in Social Policy’, Bremen, 21 October.Mundy K. and Menashy F. (2011), ‘Varieties of Organized Hypocrisy: The Case of the World Bank and Private Provision of Education’, paper presented to Workshop ‘Studying International Organisations in Social Policy’, Bremen, 21 October.Mundy K. and Murphy L. (2001), ‘Transnational Advocacy, Global Civil Society? Emerging Evidence from the Field of Education’. Comparative Education Review, 45, (1), 85–126.Mundy K. and Murphy L. (2001), ‘Transnational Advocacy, Global Civil Society? Emerging Evidence from the Field of Education’. Comparative Education Review, 45, (1), 85–126.Байер Ю. П. Акторный подход к исследованию глобальной образовательной политики // Управленческое консультирование. 2019. № 3. С. 72–78.Bayer Ju. P. Actor approach to researching global educational policy // Administrative consulting. 2019. № 3. P. 72–78. (In Rus)Торкунов А. В. Образование как инструмент «мягкой силы» во внешней политике России // Вестник МГИМО университета. 2012. № 5. С. 85–93.Torkunov A. V. Education as a soft power tool in Russian foreign policy // MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2012. № 5. P. 85–93. (In Rus)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.