managementranepaУправленческое консультированиеAdministrative Consulting1726-11391816-8590Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.10.22394/1726-1139-2021-9-89-111managementranepa-1790Research ArticleОБЩЕСТВО И РЕФОРМЫSOCIETY AND REFORMSИгровое моделирование политического пространства: анализ зарубежной литературыGame Modeling of the Political Space: Analysis of Foreign LiteratureБайерЮ. П.BayerJ. P.

Байер Юлия Паулевна - директор образовательных программ «Социальная работа» и «Социология», доцент кафедры социальных технологий, кандидат социологических наук.

Санкт-Петербург

Julia P. Bayer - Head of “Sociology” and “Social work” programmes, Associate Professor of NorthWest Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA, PhD in Sociology.

St. Petersburg

bayer-yp@ranepa.ruВасильеваВ. А.VasilyevaV. A.

Васильева Валерия Алексеевна, начальник отдела методологического сопровождения научной работы Управления научной работы Северо-Западного института управления РАНХиГС.

Санкт-Петербург

Valeria A. Vasileva - Head of the Department of Methodological Support of Scientific Work of North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA.

St. Petersburg

vasileva-va@ranepa.ruВетренкоИ. А.VetrenkoI. A.

Ветренко Инна Александровна, заведующий кафедрой социальных технологий Северо-Западного института управления РАНХиГС, доктор политических наук, профессор.

Санкт-Петербург

Inna A. Vetrenko, Head of the Chair of Social Technologies of North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA, Doctor of Science (Political Sciences), Professor.

St. Petersburg

vetrenko-ia@ranepa.ruРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации (Северо-Западный институт управления РАНХиГС)Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)2021111120210989111Copyright © Байер Ю.П., Васильева В.А., Ветренко И.А., 20212021Байер Ю.П., Васильева В.А., Ветренко И.А.Bayer J.P., Vasilyeva V.A., Vetrenko I.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1790Цель

Цель. Выявить основные тренды и пробелы в исследованиях зарубежных ученых по теме «Игровое моделирование политического пространства».

Методы

Методы. В данном обзоре авторы использовали полусистематический метод исследования литературы, при котором на первом этапе применили количественные методы, а затем выбранный массив публикаций исследовали интегративным методом, выявляя теоретические исследования и практические результаты применения игровых политических компонентов.

Результаты

Результаты. На основе отобранного зарубежного публикационного потока по теме «игровое моделирование политического пространства» методом полусистематического анализа выявлены шесть основных трендов к исследованию и применению теории игр и игрового моделирования в политическом дискурсе:

Лакуной в исследованиях последних десятилетий был выявлен вопрос применения политического игрового моделирования в выборных процессах. Несмотря на непрекращающуюся актуальность темы выборов во всем мире, какого-либо значительного объема публикаций отобрано не было.

Выводы

Выводы. Потенциал игрового моделирования в политике зарубежными исследователями используется чаще и многограннее, чем в отечественной политологии. Эволюционные теоретико-игровые модели применяются не только для моделирования самих политических и международных процессов, но и смежных социальных сфер, таких как экономика, религиозные и этнические отношения. Теория игр используется для исследования широкого круга социальных и политических проблем и социальных явлений: голосование, фундаментализм, религиозные и этнические конфликты, гражданское насилие.

Purpose is to identify the main trends and gaps in the research of foreign scientists on the topic “Game modeling of political space”.

Methods

Methods. In this review, the authors used a semi-systematic method of researching the literature, in which at the first stage they used quantitative methods, and then the selected array of publications was investigated by the integrative method, revealing theoretical studies and practical results of the application of game political components.

Results

Results. Based on the selected foreign publication stream on the topic “game modeling of political space” by the method of semi-systematic analysis, six main trends in the study and application of game theory and game modeling in political discourse have been identified:

A lacuna in the studies of recent decades has identified the issue of using political game modeling in electoral processes. Despite the continuing relevance of the topic of elections around the world, no significant volume of publications was selected.

Conclusions

Conclusions. Foreign researchers use the potential of game modeling in politics more often and more multifaceted than in domestic political science. Evolutionary game-theoretic models are used not only to model political and international processes themselves, but also to related social spheres, such as economics, religious and ethnic relations. Game theory is used to study a wide range of social and political problems and social phenomena: voting, fundamentalism, religious and ethnic conflicts, civil violence.

игровое моделированиеполитическое пространствоэволюционная теория игригра в разрешении конфликтовигровые формы коммуникациипринятие политических решенийигры политиковметод сценарных прогнозовигровые моделиигровое сотрудничествоигровые технологии выборовgame modelingpolitical spaceevolutionary game theorygame in conflict resolutiongame forms of communicationpolitical decision makingpolitician gamesscenario prediction methodgame modelsgame cooperationgame technologies of electionsИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке Фонда развития научных исследований и прикладных разработок СЗИУ РАНХиГСReferencesAmadae S. M. Game theory, cheap talk and post-truth politics: David Lewis vs. John Searle on reasons for truth-telling // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2018. N 3 (48). P. 306329.Amadae S. M. Game theory, cheap talk and post-truth politics: David Lewis vs. John Searle on reasons for truth-telling // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2018. N 3 (48). P. 306329.Aumann R. J. The game of politics // World Politics. 1962. N 4 (14). P 675-686.Aumann R. J. The game of politics // World Politics. 1962. N 4 (14). P 675-686.Axelrod R. The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists // American Political Science Review. 1981. N 2 (75). P 306-318.Axelrod R. The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists // American Political Science Review. 1981. N 2 (75). P 306-318.Bacharach H. M. Variable Universe Games под ред. A. and T P. Kirman, Cambridge : MA: The MIT Press, 1993. P 255-275.Bacharach H. M. Variable Universe Games под ред. A. and T P. Kirman, Cambridge : MA: The MIT Press, 1993. P 255-275.Barma N. H. at al. «Imagine a world in which»: Using scenarios in political science // International Studies Perspectives. 2016. N 2 (17). P 117-135.Barma N. H. at al. «Imagine a world in which»: Using scenarios in political science // International Studies Perspectives. 2016. N 2 (17). P 117-135.Bendor J., Swistak P The evolutionary stability of cooperation // American Political Science Review. 1997. N 2 (91). P 290-307.Bendor J., Swistak P The evolutionary stability of cooperation // American Political Science Review. 1997. N 2 (91). P 290-307.Boyd R. [and others]. The evolution of altruistic punishment // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003. N 6 (100). P 3531-3535.Boyd R. [and others]. The evolution of altruistic punishment // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003. N 6 (100). P 3531-3535.Bruner J. P Diversity, tolerance, and the social contract // Politics, Philosophy and Economics. 2015. N 4 (14). P 429-448.Bruner J. P Diversity, tolerance, and the social contract // Politics, Philosophy and Economics. 2015. N 4 (14). P 429-448.Etzioni-Halevy E. Democratic-elite theory: Stabilization versus breakdown of democracy // European Journal of Sociology. 1990. N 2 (31). P 317-350.Etzioni-Halevy E. Democratic-elite theory: Stabilization versus breakdown of democracy // European Journal of Sociology. 1990. N 2 (31). P 317-350.Fehr E., Gachter S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments // American Economic Review. 2000. N 4 (90). P. 980-994.Fehr E., Gachter S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments // American Economic Review. 2000. N 4 (90). P. 980-994.Goldhamer H. and S. H. Some Observations on Political Gaming // World Politics. 1959. N 10. P 71-83.Goldhamer H. and S. H. Some Observations on Political Gaming // World Politics. 1959. N 10. P 71-83.Harari Y N. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York : Harper-Collins, 2017.Harari Y N. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York : Harper-Collins, 2017.Jervis R. Cooperation under the security dilemma // World Politics. 1978. N 2 (30). P 167-214.Jervis R. Cooperation under the security dilemma // World Politics. 1978. N 2 (30). P 167-214.Landa D., Meirowitz A. Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy // American Journal of Political Science. 2009. N 2 (53). P 427-444.Landa D., Meirowitz A. Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy // American Journal of Political Science. 2009. N 2 (53). P 427-444.Lempert D. On evolutionary game theory and team reasoning // Revue d’Economie Politique. 2018. N 3 (128). P 423-446.Lempert D. On evolutionary game theory and team reasoning // Revue d’Economie Politique. 2018. N 3 (128). P 423-446.Lincoln P Bloomfield and Cornelius J. Gearin Games Foreign Policy ExpertsPlay: The Political Exercise Comes of Age // Orbis. 1973. (xvi). P 1012-1013.Lincoln P Bloomfield and Cornelius J. Gearin Games Foreign Policy ExpertsPlay: The Political Exercise Comes of Age // Orbis. 1973. (xvi). P 1012-1013.Lumsden M. The Cyprus Conflict as a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game // Journal of Conflict Resolution 1973. N 1 (17). P 7-32.Lumsden M. The Cyprus Conflict as a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game // Journal of Conflict Resolution 1973. N 1 (17). P 7-32.Luo L., Chakraborty N., Sycara K. An evolutionary game-theoretic model for ethno-religious conflicts between two groups // Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. 2011. N 4 (17). P 379-401.Luo L., Chakraborty N., Sycara K. An evolutionary game-theoretic model for ethno-religious conflicts between two groups // Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. 2011. N 4 (17). P 379-401.Mandel R. Political Gaming and Foreign Policy Making during Crises // World Politics. 1977. N 4 (29).Mandel R. Political Gaming and Foreign Policy Making during Crises // World Politics. 1977. N 4 (29).Rapoport A. Fights, Games, and Debates. Ann-Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 1960.Rapoport A. Fights, Games, and Debates. Ann-Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 1960.Schedler A. The nested game of democratization by elections // International Political Science Review. 2002. N 1 (23).Schedler A. The nested game of democratization by elections // International Political Science Review. 2002. N 1 (23).Skarzynski R., Wajzer M., Staniucha T Mind and vision: Social evolution and the origins of the political // Social Evolution and History. 2016. N 1 (15). P 126-163.Skarzynski R., Wajzer M., Staniucha T Mind and vision: Social evolution and the origins of the political // Social Evolution and History. 2016. N 1 (15). P 126-163.Snidal D. The game theory of international politics // World Politics. 1985. N 1 (38). P 25-57.Snidal D. The game theory of international politics // World Politics. 1985. N 1 (38). P 25-57.Snyder G., Diesing P Conflict Among Nations. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1977.Snyder G., Diesing P Conflict Among Nations. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1977.Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines // Journal of Business Research. 2019. N 104.Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines // Journal of Business Research. 2019. N 104.Verba S. Simulation, Reality, and Theory in International Relations // World Politics. 1964. N 3 (16). P 490-519.Verba S. Simulation, Reality, and Theory in International Relations // World Politics. 1964. N 3 (16). P 490-519.Wagner R. H. The Theory of Games and the Problem of International Cooperation // American Political Science Review. 1983. N 2 (77). P. 330-346.Wagner R. H. The Theory of Games and the Problem of International Cooperation // American Political Science Review. 1983. N 2 (77). P. 330-346.Wajzer M., Cukier-Syguta M. An evolutionary game theory approach to cooperation among political elites // Acta Politologica. 2019. N 3 (11). P 1-12.Wajzer M., Cukier-Syguta M. An evolutionary game theory approach to cooperation among political elites // Acta Politologica. 2019. N 3 (11). P 1-12.Vetrenko I. A. Game practices in the political process. Omsk : Publishing house of OmSU, 2009. 168 p.Vetrenko I. A. Game practices in the political process. Omsk : Publishing house of OmSU, 2009. 168 p.Germeyer Y B. Games with opposite interests / ed. N.N Moiseev. Science, 1976. 328 p.Germeyer Y B. Games with opposite interests / ed. N.N Moiseev. Science, 1976. 328 p.Lefebvre V. A. Lectures on the theory of reflexive games. M. : Cogito-Center, 2009. 218 p.Lefebvre V. A. Lectures on the theory of reflexive games. M. : Cogito-Center, 2009. 218 p.Novikov D. A. Ch. A.G. Reflexive games. M. : SINTEG, 2003.160 p.Novikov D. A. Ch. A.G. Reflexive games. M. : SINTEG, 2003.160 p.Svetlov V. A. Introduction to a unified theory of analysis and conflict resolution. M. : Librokom, 2009. 304 p.Svetlov V. A. Introduction to a unified theory of analysis and conflict resolution. M. : Librokom, 2009. 304 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.