<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">managementranepa</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленческое консультирование</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Administrative Consulting</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1726-1139</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1816-8590</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">managementranepa-180</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>A LINEA</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>A LINEA</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>К вопросу об определении понятия «системности реформ» в контексте социально-политической ситуации в современной России</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>On a Question of Definition of Concept «Systemacity of Reforms» in the Context of a Social and Political Situation in Contemporary Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дорогой</surname><given-names>К. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Dorogoy</surname><given-names>Konstantin Borisovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Saint-Petersburg State University Administration</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>197</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Дорогой К.Б., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Дорогой К.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Dorogoy K.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/180">https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/180</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена формированию категориального аппарата в отношении российских реформ переходного периода. В данной работе анализируется применимость понятия «системность реформ» к происходящим социально-политическим преобразованиям. Кроме того, автором отслеживается возможность включения различных концептуальных основ общей теории систем в рассмотрение процесса реформирования (Парсонс, Истон, Луман и др.).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the formation of the categorical apparatus in relation to the Russian reforms of the transition period. In this paper it’s analyzed the applicability of the concept of «systemic reforms» to the current socio-political transformations. In addition, the author traces the possibility of integrating different conceptual foundations of general systems theory in the consideration of the reform process (Parsons, Easton, Luhmann etc.).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>российские реформы</kwd><kwd>системный анализ</kwd><kwd>структурализм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Russian reform</kwd><kwd>system analysis</kwd><kwd>structuralism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Богданов А. А. Тектология - всеобщая организационная наука [Электронный ресурс]. - Url: http://uf.kgsu.ru/lib/doc.php?path (Дата обращения: 18.04.2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bogdanov A. A. Tectology- General organizational science [Tektologiya — Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka]. [Electronic resource]. — URL: http://uf.kgsu.ru/lib/doc.php?path (Date of the address: 18.04.2015). (rus)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Крюков С. В. Системный анализ: теория и практика. Ростов-на-Дону : Изд-во Южного федерального ун-та, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krukov S. V. System analysis: theory and practice [Sistemnyi analiz: teoriya i praktika]. — Rostov-on-Don : Publishing House of the South Federal University [Izd-vo Yuzhnogo federal’nogo un-ta], 2011. (rus)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милецкий В. П. Российский опыт социального государства // Измерение социальной напряженности. СПб. : РГПУ, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miletsky V.P. Russian experience of the social state [Rossiiskii opyt sotsial’nogo gosudarstva] // Measurement of social tension [Izmerenie sotsial’noi napryazhennosti]. SPb. : RSPU, 2002. (rus)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Симонян Р. Х. Без гнева и пристрастия. Экономические итоги реформ 1990-х годов и их последствия для России. М. : Изд-во «Экономика», 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simonyan R. H. Without anger and addiction. Economic results of reforms of the 1990th years and their consequences for Russia [Bez gneva i pristrastiya. Ekonomicheskie itogi reform 1990- kh godov i ikh posledstviya dlya Rossii]. M.: Publishing house «Economy» [Ekonomika], 2010. (rus)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deutsch K. Political Community in the North Atlantic Area. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1957.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deutsch K. Political Community in the North Atlantic Area. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1957.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deutsch K. Political Research in the Changing World System // International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique, 1980. Vol. 1, N 1, Studies in Systems Transformation. P. 23-33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deutsch K. Political Research in the Changing World System // International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique, 1980. Vol. 1, N 1, Studies in Systems Transformation. Pp. 23–33</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deutsch K. Social mobilization and political development // American Political Science Review. 1961. 55 (September). P. 493-514.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deutsch K. Social mobilization and political development // American Political Science Review. 1961. 55 (September). P. 493–514.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Easton D. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York : Wiley, 1965.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Easton D. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York : Wiley, 1965.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fernández J., Riley D. Beyond Strong and Weak: Rethinking Postdictatorship Civil Societies // American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 120. N 2 (September 2014). P. 432-503.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fernández J., Riley D. Beyond Strong and Weak: Rethinking Postdictatorship Civil Societies // American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 120. N 2 (September 2014). P. 432–503.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Howard M. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Howard M. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huntington S. Political development and political decay // World Politics. 1965. N 17 (April). P. 386-430.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huntington S. Political development and political decay // World Politics. 1965. N 17 (April). P. 386–430.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lee D. The Society of Society: The Grand Finale of Niklas Luhmann // Sociological Theory. Jul., 2000. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 320-330.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee D. The Society of Society: The Grand Finale of Niklas Luhmann // Sociological Theory. Jul., 2000. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 320–330.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luhmann N. Why Does Society Describe Itself as Postmodern? // Cultural Critique (The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part I). Spring, 1995. N 30. P. 171-186.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luhmann N. Why Does Society Describe Itself as Postmodern? // Cultural Critique (The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part I). Spring, 1995. N 30. P. 171–186.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Parsons T. The Point of View of the Author / The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons. Max Black (ed.). New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, 1964.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parsons T. The Point of View of the Author / The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons, Max Black (ed.). New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, 1964.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Parsons Т. Voting and the equilibrium of the American political system: On the concept of political power // Parsons T. Politics and social structure. New York : Free Press. 1969.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parsons Т. Voting and the equilibrium of the American political system: On the concept of political power // Parsons T. Politics and social structure. New York : Free Press. 1969.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Uta G. Talcott Parsons and the Transformation of German Society at the End of World War II // European Sociological Review. Dec., 1996. Vol. 12. N 3. P. 303-325.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uta G. Talcott Parsons and the Transformation of German Society at the End of World War II // European Sociological Review. Dec., 1996. Vol. 12. N 3. P. 303–325.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Von Bertalanffy L. General System Theory. Foundadion, Development, Applications. New York : Gearge Braziller, 1969.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Von Bertalanffy L. General System Theory. Foundadion, Development, Applications. New York : Gearge Braziller, 1969.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
