managementranepaУправленческое консультированиеAdministrative Consulting1726-11391816-8590Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.10.22394/1726-1139-2022-3-126-143managementranepa-1929Research ArticleОБЩЕСТВО И РЕФОРМЫSOCIETY AND REFORMSИсследование вопросов государственного регулирования системы социального кредита: взгляд со стороны бизнес-этикиResearch on Government Regulation of Social Credit System — From the Perspective of Business EthicsЛиЧжицянLiZhi-qiang

Ли Чжицян, PhD в области менеджмента (Фуданьский университет), доцент, Департамент науки

Шанхай

li Zhi-qiang, Doctor of Management, Associate Professor, Academic department

Pudong, Shanghai

zqli@celap.org.cnПудунская академия руководящих кадровChina Executive Leadership Academy20223004202203126143Copyright © Ли Ч., 20222022Ли Ч.Li Z.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1929

Система институтов является важной частью современного социального управления. Правительство, рыночные и социальные отношения внутри системы, а также соответствующие институциональные механизмы можно назвать высшим приоритетом. Корпоративная социальная ответственность в этом ключе является выдающимся примером, который включает в себя и институциональные механизмы, и отношения между правительством, рынком и обществом.

Государственное регулирование системы социального кредита представляет собой прекрасный пример для анализа. Само исследование государственного регулирования системы социального кредита производится с точки зрения государства, поэтому возникает вопрос: какова роль бизнеса при государственном регулировании системы социального кредита? Особенно этот вопрос актуален в эпоху больших данных, когда большое количество информации предоставляется частными предприятиями. Без этой информации система больших данных вряд ли сможет функционировать. И если бизнесу всё же отведена некая роль, то каким должен быть вклад государства? Ответы на эти вопросы продолжают искать представители как бизнеса, так и науки.

В данной статье предпринимается попытка построить модель теории игр, которая описывала бы взаимодействие между правительством, бизнесом и обществом и позволила бы разрешить некоторые вопросы: как должны быть устроены отношения между правительством, бизнесом и обществом? Какая система должна быть построена, чтобы можно было поддерживать данные отношения? Каким должно стать государственное регулирование системы социального кредита в КНР с точки зрения бизнес-этики?

С помощью анализа моделей теории игр автор приходит к выводу, что акционеры могут стремиться снизить угрозу смены генерального директора и вступать в сговор с менеджментом предприятия, чтобы уменьшить «кусок торта» (например, интересы заинтересованных сторон). При уменьшении доли прав и интересов заинтересованных сторон благосостояние акционеров растет, что также объясняет, почему все больше и больше руководителей высшего звена пытаются вступить в сговор с заинтересованными сторонами в рамках кампании против борьбы с поглощениями и слабой системы аудита. Модель также показывает, что соблюдение официальных законов является основным фактором увеличения выгод для заинтересованных сторон. На примере системы социального кредита мы делаем вывод, что официальные законы и постановления не могут полностью обеспечить увеличение доходов заинтересованных сторон, однако они должны усиливать преобразование институциональных преимуществ в преимущества управления. Также необходимо усиливать и правоприменительную деятельность. В конечном итоге это будет способствовать дальнейшему совершенствованию системы социального кредита.

Institution system is an important part of modern social governance. Government, market and social relations within the system, as well as the corresponding institutional arrangements, can be said to be the top priority. Corporate social responsibility is an outstanding case that embodies the relationship and institutional arrangement of the three in practice.

Government regulation of social credit system is a good example to analysis it. The research on government regulation of social credit system itself is put forward from the perspective of government, so in the field of government regulation of social credit system, should enterprises play a role? Especially in the era of big data, a large number of data are provided by private enterprises. Without these data, it is difficult to complete the construction of big data system. If enterprises should play their role, what’s the contribution of the government? Academic and industrial circles have been expressing their own opinions on these issues.

Therefore, this paper attempts to build a game model among government, enterprise and society to solve the following problems: how to solve the relationship problem among government, enterprise and society? How to build the corresponding system? What’s the corresponding government regulation of China’s social credit system go from the perspective of business ethics?

Through the game model analysis, the author finds that shareholders can reduce the threat of CEO replacement and collude with the management staff members to make the cake (including the interests of stakeholders) smaller. But on the basis of the loss of stakeholders’ rights and interests, shareholders’ wealth is increasing, which also explains why more and more senior executives are trying to form collusion with stakeholders in the campaign against antitakeover and loose audit system. Shareholders’ rights and interests and stakeholders’ rights and interests present a seesaw phenomenon. The response of the stakeholders and shareholders to a better corporate governance model is consistent. That is to say, the increase of shareholders’ income is not necessarily based on the loss of stakeholders. The game model also shows that the protection of formal laws and regulations is the main factor to increase the benefits of stakeholders. Through the case of the social credit system, we will conclude that the formal laws and regulations cannot fully ensure the increase of stakeholders’ income, but also need to strengthen the transformation of institutional advantages into governance advantages, and strengthen the law enforcement. It will finally promote the further improvement of social credit system.

система социального кредитатеория игргосударственное регулированиекорпоративная социальная ответственностьSocial credit systemGame analysisGovernment regulationCorporate social responsibilityReferencesBel B. R., Smirnov V., Wait A. Managing change: Communication, managerial style and change in organizations // Economic Modelling [Amsterdam, Netherlands]. 2018. N 12. P. 1–12. (In Eng).Bel B. R., Smirnov V., Wait A. Managing change: Communication, managerial style and change in organizations // Economic Modelling [Amsterdam, Netherlands]. 2018. N 12. P. 1–12. (In Eng).Brandi C. A. Sustainability Standards and Sustainable Development: Synergies and Trade-offs of Transnational Governance // Sustainable Development [Hoboken USA]. 2017. V. 25, N 1. P. 25–29. (In Eng).Brandi C. A. Sustainability Standards and Sustainable Development: Synergies and Trade-offs of Transnational Governance // Sustainable Development [Hoboken USA]. 2017. V. 25, N 1. P. 25–29. (In Eng).Chen Cheng, Wan Shan, Zhu le. SOE Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Respon-sibility — The Moderating Effect of Organizational Slack and the Market Process // China soft science [Beijing China]. 2019. N 6. P. 129–137. (In Chin).Chen Cheng, Wan Shan, Zhu le. SOE Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Respon-sibility — The Moderating Effect of Organizational Slack and the Market Process // China soft science [Beijing China]. 2019. N 6. P. 129–137. (In Chin).Chen Lijun, Yang Yu. Thoughts on the Construction of a Multivariate credit supervision model // Macroeconomic management [Beijing China]. 2018. N 12. P. 45–54. (In Chin).Chen Lijun, Yang Yu. Thoughts on the Construction of a Multivariate credit supervision model // Macroeconomic management [Beijing China]. 2018. N 12. P. 45–54. (In Chin).Chen Lin, Wan panbing. The Kyoto Protocol and its Clean Development Mechanism’s Emission Reduction Effects: Micro-project data on China’s Participation in Global Environmental Governance // Economic research [Beijing China]. 2019. N 3. P. 55–71. (In Chin).Chen Lin, Wan panbing. The Kyoto Protocol and its Clean Development Mechanism’s Emission Reduction Effects: Micro-project data on China’s Participation in Global Environmental Governance // Economic research [Beijing China]. 2019. N 3. P. 55–71. (In Chin).Crifo P., Forget V. D. The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Firm Level Perspective Survey // Journal of Economic Surveys [Hoboken USA]. 2015. V. 29, N 1. P. 112–130. (In Eng).Crifo P., Forget V. D. The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Firm Level Perspective Survey // Journal of Economic Surveys [Hoboken USA]. 2015. V. 29, N 1. P. 112–130. (In Eng).Djelic M. L., Etchanchu H. Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective // Journal of Business Ethics [Dordrecht, Netherlands]. 2017. V. 142, N 4. P. 641–661. (In Eng).Djelic M. L., Etchanchu H. Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective // Journal of Business Ethics [Dordrecht, Netherlands]. 2017. V. 142, N 4. P. 641–661. (In Eng).Enderle G. How Can Business Ethics Strengthen the Social Cohesion of a Society? // Journal of Business Ethics [Dordrecht, Netherlands]. 2018. V. 150, N 3. P. 1–11. (In Eng).Enderle G. How Can Business Ethics Strengthen the Social Cohesion of a Society? // Journal of Business Ethics [Dordrecht, Netherlands]. 2018. V. 150, N 3. P. 1–11. (In Eng).Fiona B., Deborah B., Samantha J. Enabling Middle Managers as Change Agents: Why Orga-nizational Support Needs to Change // Australian Journal of Public Administration [Hoboken USA]. 2018. V. 77. N 2. P. 222–235. (In Eng).Fiona B., Deborah B., Samantha J. Enabling Middle Managers as Change Agents: Why Orga-nizational Support Needs to Change // Australian Journal of Public Administration [Hoboken USA]. 2018. V. 77. N 2. P. 222–235. (In Eng).Hu Yi. Companionate Controlling Mechanism of Government and Enterprises in Environmental Protection // Administrative Tribune [Haerbin China]. 2008. N 4. P. 80–82 (In Chin).Hu Yi. Companionate Controlling Mechanism of Government and Enterprises in Environmental Protection // Administrative Tribune [Haerbin China]. 2008. N 4. P. 80–82 (In Chin).Knudsen J. S. Government Regulation of International Corporate Social Responsibility in the US and the UK: How Domestic Institutions Shape Mandatory and Supportive Initiatives // British Journal of Industrial Relations [Hoboken USA]. 2018. V. 56, N 1. P. 164–188. (In Eng).Knudsen J. S. Government Regulation of International Corporate Social Responsibility in the US and the UK: How Domestic Institutions Shape Mandatory and Supportive Initiatives // British Journal of Industrial Relations [Hoboken USA]. 2018. V. 56, N 1. P. 164–188. (In Eng).Kourula A., Moon J., Salles-Djelic M. L., et al. New Roles of Government in the Governance of Business Conduct: Implications for Management and Organizational Research // Organization Studies [London England]. 2019. V. 40, N 8. P. 1101–1123. (In Eng).Kourula A., Moon J., Salles-Djelic M. L., et al. New Roles of Government in the Governance of Business Conduct: Implications for Management and Organizational Research // Organization Studies [London England]. 2019. V. 40, N 8. P. 1101–1123. (In Eng).Liang Weiliang. On the Sharing of Financial Credit Reporting Data: Current Dilemma and Future Prospect // Credit information [Zhengzhou China]. 2019. N 6. P. 14–19(In Chin).Liang Weiliang. On the Sharing of Financial Credit Reporting Data: Current Dilemma and Future Prospect // Credit information [Zhengzhou China]. 2019. N 6. P. 14–19(In Chin).Mareike Ohlberg, Liu xiaoyue. Public opinion and practice of China’s social credit system // Social sciences abroad [Beijing China]. 2018. N 2. P. 153–154. (In Chin).Mareike Ohlberg, Liu xiaoyue. Public opinion and practice of China’s social credit system // Social sciences abroad [Beijing China]. 2018. N 2. P. 153–154. (In Chin).Midttun A., Gjolberg M., Kourula A. et al. Public Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Four Nordic Countries: Harmony of Goals and Conflict of Means // Business & Society [Cary, USA]. 2012. V. 54, N 4. P. 464–500. (In Eng).Midttun A., Gjolberg M., Kourula A. et al. Public Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Four Nordic Countries: Harmony of Goals and Conflict of Means // Business & Society [Cary, USA]. 2012. V. 54, N 4. P. 464–500. (In Eng).Schrempf-Stirling J. State Power: Rethinking the Role of the State in Political Corporate Social Responsibility // Journal of Business Ethics [Dordrecht, Netherlands]. 2018. V. 150, N 1. P. 1–14. (In Eng).Schrempf-Stirling J. State Power: Rethinking the Role of the State in Political Corporate Social Responsibility // Journal of Business Ethics [Dordrecht, Netherlands]. 2018. V. 150, N 1. P. 1–14. (In Eng).Sun Jiuwen, Hu hengsong. Judgment on Illegality of Environmental Crime，Environment Pollution as ExampleSu YongshengPerfection of social credit system and economic development — Reflection on the domestic cycle // Gansu Social Sciences [Lanzhou, China]. 2021. N 1. P. 123–129. (In Chin).Sun Jiuwen, Hu hengsong. Judgment on Illegality of Environmental Crime，Environment Pollution as ExampleSu YongshengPerfection of social credit system and economic development — Reflection on the domestic cycle // Gansu Social Sciences [Lanzhou, China]. 2021. N 1. P. 123–129. (In Chin).Tang Qingli. Self-discipline alienation and cooperative governance in the construction of social credit system // China Legal Science [Beijing, China]. 2012. N 5. P. 38–45. (In Chin).Tang Qingli. Self-discipline alienation and cooperative governance in the construction of social credit system // China Legal Science [Beijing, China]. 2012. N 5. P. 38–45. (In Chin).Xiao Hongjun. The Renection and Transcendence of the Creating Shared Value as a Corporate Social Responsibility Paradigm // Management world [Beijing, China]. 2020. N 5. P. 87–115. (In Chin).Xiao Hongjun. The Renection and Transcendence of the Creating Shared Value as a Corporate Social Responsibility Paradigm // Management world [Beijing, China]. 2020. N 5. P. 87–115. (In Chin).Yang Chunfang. Government regulation and corporate social responsibility from the perspective of Sino US cultural comparison // Economic Forum [Shijiazhuang, China]. 2015. N 7. P. 138–144. (In Chin).Yang Chunfang. Government regulation and corporate social responsibility from the perspective of Sino US cultural comparison // Economic Forum [Shijiazhuang, China]. 2015. N 7. P. 138–144. (In Chin).Yu Qingsong. Algorithmic governmentality: The Governance Paradigm of social credit system and its legalization Normative Documents // Law forum [Jinan, China]. 2020. N 2. P. 36–49. (In Chin).Yu Qingsong. Algorithmic governmentality: The Governance Paradigm of social credit system and its legalization Normative Documents // Law forum [Jinan, China]. 2020. N 2. P. 36–49. (In Chin).Zhang Qi, Zheng Yao, Kong Dongmin. Local Environmental Governance Pressure, Executive’s Working Experience and Enterprise Investment in Environmental Protection, A Quasi. Natural Experiment Based on China’S “Ambient Air Quality Standards 2012” // Economic research [Beijing, China]. 2019. N 6. P. 183–198. (In Chin).Zhang Qi, Zheng Yao, Kong Dongmin. Local Environmental Governance Pressure, Executive’s Working Experience and Enterprise Investment in Environmental Protection, A Quasi. Natural Experiment Based on China’S “Ambient Air Quality Standards 2012” // Economic research [Beijing, China]. 2019. N 6. P. 183–198. (In Chin).Zheng Shiming. How does Environmental Policy Influence Environmental Quality? Based on Provincial Panel Data // China soft science [Beijing, China]. 2019. N 2. P. 49–61. (In Chin).Zheng Shiming. How does Environmental Policy Influence Environmental Quality? Based on Provincial Panel Data // China soft science [Beijing, China]. 2019. N 2. P. 49–61. (In Chin).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.