References

managementranepa

Управленческое консультирование

Administrative Consulting

1726-11391816-8590

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.

10.22394/1726-1139-2022-4-79-98

managementranepa-1949

Research Article

ОБЩЕСТВО И РЕФОРМЫ

SOCIETY AND REFORMS

Трансформация государственного управления в контексте устойчивого развития на основе исследований в социальных нейронауках. (Часть 1)

Public Administration Transformation Based on Research in Social Neurosciences in the Context of Sustainable Development. (Part 1)

Сланевская

Н. М.

Slanevskaya

N. M.

Сланевская Нина Михайловна, кандидат политических наук, в 2009–2018 гг. директор ООО «Центр междисциплинарной нейронауки»

г. Санкт-Петербург

Nina M. Slanevskaya, PhD in Political Science, Director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Neuroscience from 2009–2018

St. Petersburg

slanevskaya.nina@gmail.com

2022

23052022

047998

2022

Сланевская Н.М.

Slanevskaya N.M.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1949

В статье предлагается новой подход к государственному управлению и социальному устройству с привлечением нейронаучного метода социальных нейронаук. Глобальный рост социальных конфликтов, самоубийств, насилия и нервно-психических нарушений подтверждает несостоятельность существующих социальных систем и государственного управления. Результаты исследований в социальных нейронауках показывают ошибочность многих теоретических положений, на основе которых строится практика управления государством. Преимущество нейронаучного метода социальных нейронаук заключается в том, что он дает эмпирическую проверку теоретическим положениям; ориентирован на человека, так как изучает нейробиологическую реакцию человека в разных сферах социальной жизни; показывает истинное отношение человека к ситуации до его сознательного контроля; демонстрирует, как общественное устройство влияет на мозг, нервно-психическое состояние человека, поведение и здоровье в целом. Существует необходимость трансформации государственного управления, и для этого потребуется специальная программа исследований взаимосвязи между закономерностями мышления, нейробиологической реакцией мозга и социальными проблемами, что поможет определить параметры организации общества, при которых головной мозг и мышление человека будут функционировать в оптимальном режиме. Сохранение здорового мозга и развитие умственных способностей людей — это главная задача государственного управления, потому что именно от интеллектуальной способности населения зависит успех государства во всех областях.

The article proposes a new approach to public administration and social structure using the neuroscientific method of social neurosciences. The global growth of social conflicts, suicides, violence and neuropsychic disorders confirms the failure of existing social systems and state management. The results of research in social neurosciences show the fallacy of many theoretical propositions on the basis of which the practice of state management is built. The advantage of the neuroscientific method of social neurosciences is that it provides an empirical test of theoretical propositions; is human-oriented, as it studies the neurobiological response of a person in different areas of social life; shows the true attitude of a person to the situation before his conscious control; demonstrates how the social structure affects the brain, the neuropsychic state of a person, behavior and health in general. There is a need to revise public administration, and this will require a special programme of research on the relationship between the patterns of thinking, the neurobiological response of the brain and social problems, which will help to determine the parameters of the organization of society in which the human brain and mind will function optimally. Maintaining a healthy brain and developing people’s mental abilities is the main task of public administration, because it is the intellectual ability of the population that the state’s success in all areas depends on.

государственное управлениемозгморальные эмоциинейробиологическая реакциянейронаучный методнейропластичностьнейроэкономикасоциальные болезнисоциальные нейронаукиэмпатическая реакция

public administrationbrainmoral emotionsneurobiological responseneuroscientific methodneuroplasticityneuroeconomicssocial diseasessocial neurosciencesempathic response

References1

Бехтерева Н. П. Магия мозга и лабиринты жизни. М. : Сова, 2008.

Bekhtereva N. P. The Magic of the Brain and the Labyrinths of Life. M. : Sova, 2008. (In Rus).

Кудрявцева Н. Тревога как социальная болезнь // Химия и жизнь — ХХI век. 2004. № 11. С. 10–15.

Kudryavtseva N. Anxiety as a Social Disease // Chemistry and Life — XXI century. 2004. N 11. P. 10–15. (In Rus).

Кудрявцева Н. Н., Августинович Д. Ф. Молекулярные механизмы социального поведения: комментарии к статье Berton et al., Science, 2006 // Нейронауки. 2006. № 4 (6). С. 33–35.

Kudryavtseva N. N., Avgustinovich D. F. Molecular Mechanisms of Social Behavior: Comments on the Article by Burton et al., Science, 2006 // Neurosciences. 2006. N 4 (6). P. 33–35. (In Rus).

Adolphs R. Social Cognition and Human Brain. Review // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999. Vol. 3. N 12. P. 469–479.

Akitsuki Y., Decety J. Social Context and Perceived Agency Affects Empathy for Pain: An Eventrelated fMRI Investigation // NeuroImage. 2009. N 47. P. 722–734.

Aharon I., Etcoff N., Ariely D., Chabris C. F. at al. Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value: fMRI and Behavioral Evidence // Neuron. 2001. N 32 (3). P. 537–551.

Bechara A. The Role of Emotion in Decision-making: Evidence from Neurological Patients with Orbitofrontal Damage // Brain and Cognition. 2004. N 55. P. 30–40.

Berkman E., Lieberman M. Using Neuroscience to Broaden Emotion Regulation: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2009. N 3 (4). P. 475–493.

Breiter H. C., Aharon I., Kahneman D., Dale A. at al. Functional Imaging of Neural Responses to Expectancy and Experience of Monetary Gains and Losses // Neuron. 2001. N 30 (2). P. 619–39.

Brody D.J., Gu Q. Antidepressant Use Among Adults: United States, 2015–2018 // NCHS Data Brief. 2020. Sep (377). P. 1–8.

Camerer C., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics // Journal of Economic Literature. 2005. Vol. XLIII. P. 9–64.

Carr R. Neurotransmitters, Neuromodulators and Hormones: Putting It All Together // eds. N. Hass- Cohen, R. Carr /Art Therapy and Clinical Neuroscience. London and Philadelphia. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 2008. P. 76–91.

Catterall J. S., Chapleau R., Iwanaga J. Involvement in the Arts and Human Development: Extending an Analysis of General Associations and Introducing the Special Cases of Intensive Involvement in Music and Theatre Arts // ed. E. B. Fiske /Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning. Washington, DC. Arts Education Partnership and the President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities. 1998. P. 1–18.

Chang S.-S., Stuckler D., Yip P., Gunnell D. Impact of 2008 Global Economic Crisis on Suicide: Time Trend Study in 54 Countries // BMJ. 2013. Sep 17. P. 1–15.

Chayer C., Freeman M. Frontal Lobe Functions // Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2001. N I. P. 547–552.

Chorvat T., McCabe K., Smith V. Law and Neuroeconomics // George Mason University, School of Law, Law and Economics working paper series, Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. 2004.

Christian D. The Cortex: Regulation of Sensory and Emotional Experience // eds. N. Hass- Cohen, R. Carr /Art Therapy and Clinical Neuroscience. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008. P. 62–75.

Craske M., Stein M., Eley T. et al. Anxiety Disorders // Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2017. N 3. No of the article 17024 (2017).

Damasio A. Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. London : Vintage Books, 2006.

De Vignemont F., Frith U. Autism, Morality and Empathy // (ed.) W. Sinnott-Armstrong /Moral Psychology, the Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. Massachusetts : MIT Press, 2008. Vol. 3. P. 273–280.

Decety J., Michalska K., Akitsuki Y., Lahey B. Atypical Emphatic Reponses in Adolescents with Aggressive Conduct Disorder: A Functional MRI Investigation // Biological Psychology. 2009. N 80. P. 203–211.

Eisenberger N., Taylor S., Gable S., Hilmert C. at al. Neural Pathways Link Social Support to Attenuated Neuroendocrine Stress Responses // NeuroImage. 2007. N 35. P. 1601–1612.

Elzinga B. M., Roelofs K. Cortisol-induced Impairments of Working Memory Require Acute Sympathetic Activation // Behavioral Neuroscience. 2005. N 119 (1). P. 98–103.

Frith C. D., Frith U. Interacting Minds: A Biological Basis // Science. 1999. Vol. 286. N 5445. P. 1692–1695.

Galbraith A., Subrin R., Ross D. Alzheimer’s Disease: Art, Creativity and the Brain // eds. N. Hass- Cohen, R. Carr /Art Therapy and Clinical Neuroscience. London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008. P. 254–269.

Gallese V., Goldman A. Mirror Neurons and the Simulation Theory of Mind-Reading // Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1998. N 2 (12). P. 493–501.

Greene J. The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul // (ed.) W. Sinnott-Armstrong /Moral Psychology, the Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. Massachusetts : MIT Press, 2008. Vol. 3. P. 35–79.

Goldberg E. The Wisdom Paradox: How Your Mind Can Grow Stronger as Your Brain Grows Older? New York : Gothman Books, 2005.

Gustavsson A., Svensson M., Jacobi F., Allgulander C. at al. Cost of Disorders of the Brain in Europe 2010 // European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011. N 21 (10). P. 718–779.

Harrison N., Singer T., Rotshtein P., Dolan R. at al. Pupillary Contagion: Central Mechanisms Engaged in Sadness Processing // SCAN. 2006. N 1. P. 5–7.

Hegtvedt K. A., Killian C. Fairness and Emotions: Reaction to the Process and Outcomes of Negotiations // Social Forces. 1999. N 78. P. 269–303.

Hein G., Singer T. I Feel How You Feel But Not Always: the Empathic Brain and Its Modulation // Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2008. N 18. P. 153–158.

Horner P. J., Gage F. H. Regeneration in the Adult and Ageing Brain // Archives of Neurology. 2002. N 59. P. 1717–1720.

Knutson B., Wimmer G. E., Kuhnen C. M., Winkielman P. Nucleus Accumbens Activation Mediates the Influence of Reward Cues on Financial Risk Taking // NeuroReport. 2008. N 19. P. 509–513.

Knutson B., Bossaerts P. Neural Antecedents of Financial Decisions // The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007. N 27 (31). P. 8174–8177.

Kozorovitskiy Y., Gould E. Adult Neurogenesis: A Mechanism for Brain Repair? // Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2003. N 25. P. 721–732.

Lamm C., Batson C. D., Decety J. The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspectivetaking and Cognitive Appraisal // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007. N 19 (1). P. 42–58.

Lepore S. J., Allen K. A., Evans G. W. Social Support Lowers Cardiovascular Reactivity to an Acute Stressor // Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993. N 55. P. 518–524.

Lieberman M. Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes // The Annual Review of Psychology. 2007. N 58. P. 259–289.

Lieberman M. D., Gaunt R., Gilbert D. T., Trope Y. Reflection and Reflexion: a Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to Attributional Inference // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2002. N 34. P. 199–249.

Lieberman M., Eisenberger N. Conflict and Habit: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to the Self // eds. A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, D. A. Stapel /On Building, Defending and regulating the Self: A Psychological Perspective. New York : Psychology Press, 2004. P. 77–102.

Lieberman M. D., Schreiber D., Ochsner K. Is Political Cognition Like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking // Political Psychology. 2003. Vol. 24. N 4. P. 681–704.

Moll J., Zahn R., De Oliveira-Souza R., Krueger F. at al. The Neural Basis of Human Moral Cognition // Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005. Vol. 6. P. 799–809.

Moll J., De Oliveira-Souza R., Zahn R., Grafman J. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Emotions // ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong /Moral Psychology, the Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. Massachusetts. MIT Press. 2008. Vol. 3. P. 1–17.

Moll J., de Oliveira-Souza R., Eslinger P. J. Morals and the Human Brain: a Working Model // Neuroreport. 2003. N 14. P. 299–305.

Nichols S., Folds-Bennett T. Are Children Moral Objectivists? Children’s Judgments about Moral and Response-dependent Properties // Cognition. 2003. N 90 (2). P. B23–32.

Petrovic P., Kalso E., Petersson K. M., Ingvar M. Placebo and Opioid Analgesia — Imaging a Shared Neuronal Network // Science. 2002. N 295. P. 1737–1740.

Petrovic P., Dietrich T., Fransson P., Andersson J. at al. Placebo in Emotional Processing — induced Expectations of Anxiety Relief Activate a Generalized Modulatory Network // Neuron. 2005. N 46. P. 957–969.

Petrovic P., Kalisch R., Singer T., Dolan R. Oxytocin Attenuates Affective Evaluations of Conditioned Faces and Amygdala Activity // The Journal of Neuroscience. 2008. N 28(26)/ P. 6607–6615.

Pfaff D. The Neuroscience of Fair Play. Why We (Usually) Follow the Golden Rule. New York, Washington : Dana Press, 2007.

Sanfey A., Cohen J. Is Knowing Always Feeling? // PNAS. 2004. Vol. 101. N 48. P. 16709–16710.

Sapolsky R. Stressed-out Memories: A Little Stress Sharpens Memory. But After Prolonged Stress, the Mental Picture Isn’t Pretty // Scientific American Mind. 2004. N 14 (5). P. 28–34.

Selye H. The Stress of Life. McGraw-Hill Education, 1978.

Singer T., Seymour B., O’Doherty J., Stephan K. at al. Empathy Neural Responses Are Modulated by the Perceived Fairness of Others // Nature. 2006. Vol. 439. P. 466–469.

Singer T., Lamm C. The Social Neuroscience of Empathy // The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009. N 1156. P. 81–96.

Singer T., Steinbeis N. Differential Roles of Fairness — and Compassion-Based Motivations for Cooperation, Defection, and Punishment // Values, Empathy, and Fairness Across Social Barriers, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009. N 1167. P. 41–50.

Snowdon D. Aging with Grace? New York : Bantam Books, 2001.

Stout L. A. Taking Conscience Seriously // (ed.) P. J. Zak /Moral Markets. The Critical Role of Values in the Economy. Princeton and Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2008. P. 157– 172.

Tabibnia G., Lieberman M. Fairness and Cooperation are Rewarding. Evidence from Social Cognitive Neuroscience // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007. N 1118. P. 90– 101.

Tancredi L. Hardwired Behavior: What Neuroscience Reveals about Morality. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Turner R., Whitehead C. How Collective Representations Can Change the Structure of the Brain // Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2008. N 15 (10–11). P. 43–57.

Vance R., Wahlin K. Memory and Art // eds. N. Hass-Cohen and R. Carr /Art Therapy and Clinical Neuroscience // London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008. P. 159–173.

Wittchen HU., Jacobi F., Rehm J., Gustavsson A. et al. The Size and Burden of Mental Disorders and Other Disorders of the Brain in Europe 2010 // European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011. Sep. 21 (9). P. 655–79.

Yu O.-C., Jung B., Go H., Park M. at al. Association Between Dementia and Depression: a Retrospective Study Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort Database // BMJ Open. 2020. 5 October.

Zimbardo P., Maslach C., Haney C. Reflections on the Stanford Prison Experiment: Genesis, Transformation, Consequences // ed. T. Blass / Obedience to Authority: Current Perspectives on the Milgram Paradigm. 2000. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. P. 193–237.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.