managementranepaУправленческое консультированиеAdministrative Consulting1726-11391816-8590Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.10.22394/1726-1139-2024-1-144-162managementranepa-2457Research ArticleВЛАСТЬ И ЭКОНОМИКАPOWER AND ECONOMICSЭкосистемный подход к сбалансированному территориальному развитиюAn Ecosystem Approach to Balanced Territorial Developmenthttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-7550ГамидуллаеваЛ. А.GamidullaevaL. A.

Гамидуллаева Лейла Айваровна, доктор экономических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой «Менеджмент и государственное управление» 

Leyla A. Gamidullaeva, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of Department of management and public administration

gamidullaeva@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-1001ГрошеваЕ. С.GroshevaE. S.

Грошева Екатерина Сергеевна, старший преподаватель кафедры «Менеджмент и бизнес-информатика», научный сотрудник Пензенского казачьего института технологий (филиал)

 

Ekaterina S. Grosheva, Senior Lecturer, Department of Management and Business Informatics, Researcher, Penza Cossack Institute of Technology (branch)

grosheva.work@gmail.comПензенский государственный университетPenza State UniversityМосковский государственный университет технологий и управления имени К. Г. Разумовского (Первый казачий университет)K. G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of technologies and management (the First Cossack University)20242802202401144162Copyright © Гамидуллаева Л.А., Грошева Е.С., 20242024Гамидуллаева Л.А., Грошева Е.С.Gamidullaeva L.A., Grosheva E.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/2457Актуальность

Актуальность. Проблема сбалансированного и устойчивого развития сельских территорий чрезвычайно актуальна в настоящее время, особенно в условиях углубления локализации и возрастания роли природно-ресурсных факторов.

Цель исследования

Цель исследования. Целью статьи является разработка теоретико-методологических аспектов устойчивого развития территорий на основе экосистемного подхода для формирования единой многоуровневой стратегии их развития. Данные и методы. В статье обосновано применение экосистемного подхода к развитию сельских территорий с малыми городскими поселениями для повышения эффективности сельского бизнеса, оптимизации расходования бюджетных средств за счет приоритизации получателей государственной поддержки, стимулирования устойчивого развития предприятий и отрасли, повышения согласованности региональной экономической политики. Представлены концептуальные основы этого подхода и предложен алгоритм выбора участников сельской экосистемы.

Результаты

Результаты. Предложенный подход позволяет операционализировать процессы самоорганизации в экосистеме, обеспечить сбалансированность процессов взаимодействия ее участников. Результаты исследования вносят определенный вклад в решение проблемы формирования территориальной социально-экономической экосистемы посредством разработки алгоритма выбора целевых показателей достижения целей устойчивого развития с учетом специфики и тенденций развития территорий.

Выводы

Выводы. Выводы, вытекающие из проведенного исследования, предоставляют ученым и государственным органам необходимую информацию для лучшего понимания практических механизмов и инструментов обеспечения сбалансированного развития территорий, обеспечения перехода от фрагментарных бессистемных мер государственной поддержки к эффективной дифференцированной и адресной региональной политике.

Relevance. The problems of sustainable development of rural areas are extremely relevant nowadays, especially in the context of deepening localization and the increasing role of territorial and natural resources. research objective. The purpose of the article is to develop theoretical and methodological aspects of sustainable development of territories, encompassing rural areas with small urban settlements, based on the ecosystem approach to form a unified multi-level strategy for the development thereof. Method and data. The paper substantiates an application of the ecosystem approach to the development of rural areas in increasing the efficiency of rural businesses, budgetary spending through prioritization of state support recipients, stimulating sustainable development of enterprises and the industry, and increasing the consistency of regional economic policy. The conceptual foundations of this approach are presented, and an algorithm to select participants in a rural ecosystem is proposed. results. The proposed approach allows operationalizing self-organization processes in an ecosystem, ensuring a balance of interaction processes of its participants. The research results have contributed to solving the problem of territorial socio-economic ecosystem formation by proposing an algorithm to select target indicators for achieving sustainable development goals, taking into account the specifics and development trends of territories. Conclusions. The conclusions arising from the conducted research provide scientists, government bodies with the necessary information for a better understanding of practical mechanisms to provide balanced territorial development, ensure the move from fragmentary unsystematic measures of state support to effective differentiated and targeted regional policy of rural areas.

устойчивое развитиесельские районымалые территориипространственная региональная политикастратегиятерриториальное развитиесельская экосистемакластерsustainable developmentrural areassmall territoriesspatial regional policystrategyterritorial developmentrural ecosystemclusterThis study was supported by the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for the young Russian scientists’ state support on scientific research “Balanced development of the territory based on industrial clusters in the context of theory of “smart specialization”” (grant number: MD-1823.2022.2).ReferencesAlekseev A., Safronov S., Savoskul M., Kuznecova G. The main trends in the evolution of rural settlement in Russia in the XX — early XXI centuries. ECO. 2019. N 49 (4). P. 26–49. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2019-4-26-49 (in Rus.).Алексеев А., Сафронов С., Савоскул М., Кузнецова Г. Основные тенденции эволюции сельского расселения России в ХХ — начале ХХI вв. // ECO. 2019. № 49 (4). С. 26–49. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2019-4-26-49.Glazovsky N., Gordeev A., Sdasyuk G. Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development: World Experience and Problems of Russia. M. : KMK Scientific Press, 2005. 614 p. (in Rus.).Глазовский Н. Ф., Гордеев А. В., Сдасюк Г. В. Устойчивое развитие сельского хозяйства и сельских территорий: Зарубежный опыт и проблемы России. М. : Т-во научных изданий КМК, 2005. 614 с.Ikonnikova О. Basic approaches to the notion of “sustainable development of rural territories” // Problems of Modern Economics. 2012. N 1 (41). P. 349–352 (in Rus.).Иконникова О. В. Основные подходы к определению понятия «Устойчивое развитие сельских территорий» // ПСЭ. 2012. № 1 (41). C. 349–352.Kiryushin V. Consequences of Radical Economic Liberalism and the Tasks of the New Agrarian Policy // Innovationsю 2015. N 1. P. 14–27 (in Rus.).Кирюшин В. И. Последствия радикального экономического либерализма и задачи новой аграрной политики // Инновации. 2015. № 1. C. 14–27.Oborin M., Chernikova S. The impact of agriculture on socio-economic development of the region // Transbaikal State University Journal. 2018. N 24 (8). P. 137‒146. DOI: 10.21209/222792452018248137146 (in Rus.).Оборин М. С., Черникова С. А. Влияние сельского хозяйства на социально-экономическое развитие региона // Вестник ЗабГУ. 2018. № 24 (8). С. 137‒146. DOI: 10.21209/ 222792452018248137146.Repina А., Zaitsev D., Kornilov D. Problems of development of rural areas and solutions // Aeconomics: Economics and Agriculture. 2014. N 3 (3). P. 4–9 (in Rus.).Репина А. А., Зайцев Д. А., Корнилов Д. А. Проблемы развития сельских территорий и пути решения // Аэкономика: экономика и сельское хозяйство. 2014. № 3(3). С. 4–9.Tikhii V., Koreva O. (2019). The sustainable development of rural territories of the region through the formation of regional agro-industrial cluster InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories // Proceedings of the International conference. M. : Moscow University Press. V. 25. P. 1. P. 206–218. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2019-1-25-206-218 (in Rus.).Тихий В. И., Корева О. В. Повышение устойчивости развития сельских территорий региона через формирование территориального агропромышленного кластера // Proceedings of the International conference. M. : Изд-во МГУ. Т. 25. Ч. 1. С. 206–218. DOI: 10.35595/2414- 9179-2019-1-25-206-218.Ushachev I. at al. Development of agriculture of Russia and increasing its competitiveness under the conditions of integration in the EAEU. M. : Rosinformagrotekh, 2018. ISBN 978-5-7367-1469-8 (in Rus.).Ушачев И. Г. Развитие и повышение конкурентоспособности сельского хозяйства России в условиях интеграции в ЕАЭС. / И. Г. Ушачев [и др.]. М.: Росинформагротех, 2018. 348 с.Ushachev I. at al. Strategic directions for the development of agriculture in Russia in the context of deepening integration into the EAEU. M. : RAS. ISBN 978-5-906906-86-1 (in Rus.).Ушачев И. Г. Стратегические направления развития сельского хозяйства России в условиях углубления интеграции в ЕАЭС / И. Г. Ушачев [и др.]. М. : РАН, 2017. 48 с.Adner R., Kapoor R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations // Strategic Management Journal. 2010. N 31 (3). P. 306–333. DOI: 10.1002/smj.821.Adner R., Kapoor R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of techno- logical interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations // Strategic Management Journal. 2010. N 31 (3). P. 306–333. DOI: 10.1002/smj.821.Alvedalen J., Boschma R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda // European Planning Studies. 2017. Vol. 25. N 6. P. 887–903. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.Alvedalen J., Boschma R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda // European Planning Studies. 2017. Vol. 25. N 6. P. 887–903. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.Barreiro-Gen M. Discussing Approaches to Standard of Living. Cham : Springer, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_22-1.Barreiro-Gen M. Discussing Approaches to Standard of Living. Cham : Springer, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_22-1.Blew R. On the definition of ecosystem // Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America. 1996. N 77. P. 171–173.Blew R. On the definition of ecosystem // Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America. 1996. N 77. P. 171–173.Carolina Wijayanti F., Veronica V., Biri A. The important role of coffee agroecosystem for rural development // IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. 2019. Sci., 374 012025. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/374/1/012025.Carolina Wijayanti F., Veronica V., Biri A. The important role of coffee agroecosystem for rural development // IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. 2019. Sci., 374 012025. DOI: 10.1088/1755- 1315/374/1/012025.Chertow M., Portlock M. Developing Industrial Ecosystems: Approaches, Cases, and Tools // Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series. 2002. N 95. 16. Cotter D. Poor people in poor places: Local opportunity structures and household poverty // Rural Sociology. 2002. N 67 (4). DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00118.x.Chertow M., Portlock M. Developing Industrial Ecosystems: Approaches, Cases, and Tools // Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series. 2002. N 95.Da Rosa Pires A., Pertoldi M., Edwards J., Hegyi F. Smart Specialisation and Innovation in Rural Areas // S3 Policy Brief Series. 09/2014. DOI: 10.2791/312469Cotter D. Poor people in poor places: Local opportunity structures and household poverty // Rural Sociology. 2002. N 67 (4). DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00118.x.Fisher M. On the Empirical Finding of a Higher Risk of Poverty in Rural Areas: Is Rural Residence Endogenous to Poverty? // Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2005. N 30 (2). P. 185–199. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31219.Da Rosa Pires A., Pertoldi M., Edwards J., Hegyi F. Smart Specialisation and Innovation in Rural Areas // S3 Policy Brief Series. 09/2014. DOI: 10.2791/312469Gamidullaeva L, Shmeleva N, Tolstykh T., Shmatko A. An Assessment Approach to Circular Business Models within an Industrial Ecosystem for Sustainable Territorial Development // Sustainability. 2022. N 14 (2). P. 704. DOI: 10.3390/su14020704.Fisher M. On the Empirical Finding of a Higher Risk of Poverty in Rural Areas: Is Rural Residence Endogenous to Poverty? // Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2005. N 30 (2). P. 185–199. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31219.Gamidullaeva L., Korostyshevskaya E. Prospective Models for Sustainable Development of Territorial Socio-Economic Systems // Sustainable development of territorial socio-economic systems: research perspectives and empirical evidence. Springer Nature. 2023 (in Press).Gamidullaeva L., Shmeleva N., Tolstykh T., Shmatko A. An Assessment Approach to Circular Business Models within an Industrial Ecosystem for Sustainable Territorial Development // Sustainability. 2022. N 14 (2). P. 704. DOI: 10.3390/su14020704.Gamidullaeva L., Tolstykh T., Bystrov A., Radaykin A., Shmeleva N. Cross-Sectoral Digital Platform as a Tool for Innovation Ecosystem Development // Sustainability. 2021. N 13. P. 11686. DOI: 10.3390/su132111686.Gamidullaeva L., Korostyshevskaya E. Prospective Models for Sustainable Development of Territorial Socio-Economic Systems // Sustainable development of territorial socio-economic systems: research perspectives and empirical evidence. Springer Nature. 2023 (in Press).Gray D., Shaw J., Farrington J. Community transport, social capital and social exclusion in rural areas // Area. 2006. N 38. P. 89–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00662.x.Gamidullaeva L., Tolstykh T., Bystrov A., Radaykin A., Shmeleva N. Cross-Sectoral Digital Platform as a Tool for Innovation Ecosystem Development // Sustainability. 2021. N 13. P. 11686. DOI: 10.3390/su132111686.Gumerov R. State program for the development of agriculture: Ambitions and realities // ECO. 2019. N 49 (4). P. 8–25. DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131–7652–2019–4–8–25.Gray D., Shaw J., Farrington J. Community transport, social capital and social exclusion in rural areas // Area. 2006. N 38. P. 89–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00662.x.Hughes T. P. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Gumerov R. State program for the development of agriculture: Ambitions and realities // ECO. 2019. N 49 (4). P. 8–25. DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131–7652–2019–4–8–25.Lichter D., Johnson K. The changing spatial concentration of America’s rural poor population // Rural Sociology. 2007. N 72 (3). P. 331–358. DOI: 10.1526/003601107781799290.Hughes T. P. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Martinidis G., Adamseged M., Dyjakon A., Fallas Y. at al. How Clusters Create Shared Value in Rural Areas: An Examination of Six Case Studies // Sustainability 2021. N 13. P. 4578. DOI: 10.3390/su13084578.Lichter D., Johnson K. The changing spatial concentration of America’s rural poor population // Rural Sociology. 2007. N 72 (3). P. 331–358. DOI: 10.1526/003601107781799290.Medeiros E. Development Clusters for Small Places and Rural Development for Territorial Cohesion? // Sustainability. 2022. N 14 (1). P. 84. DOI: 10.3390/su14010084.Martinidis G., Adamseged M., Dyjakon A., Fallas Y. at al. How Clusters Create Shared Value in Rural Areas: An Examination of Six Case Studies // Sustainability 2021. N 13. P. 4578. DOI: 10.3390/su13084578.Michalek J., Ciaian P., Di Marcantonio F. Regional impacts of the EU Rural Development Programme: Poland’s food processing sector // Reg. Stud. 2022. N 54. P. 1389–1401. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1708306.Medeiros E. Development Clusters for Small Places and Rural Development for Territorial Cohesion? // Sustainability. 2022. N 14 (1). P. 84. DOI: 10.3390/su14010084.Murphy D., Marshall A. Citizenship and Sustainability in Organizations: Exploring and Spanning the Boundaries (1st ed.). Routledge, 2020. 178 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780429347399.Michalek J., Ciaian P., Di Marcantonio F. Regional impacts of the EU Rural Development Programme: Poland’s food processing sector // Reg. Stud. 2022. N 54. P. 1389–1401. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1708306.Pelucha M., Kveton V. The role of EU rural development policy in the neo-productivist agricultural paradigm // Reg. Stud. 2017. N 51. P. 1860–1870. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608.Murphy D., Marshall A. Citizenship and Sustainability in Organizations: Exploring and Spanning the Boundaries (1st ed.). Routledge, 2020. 178 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780429347399.Pollermann K., Raue P., Schnaut G. Opportunities for a participative approach in rural development // Findings from LEADER in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and the requirements for Community Led Local Development Landbauforsch, Landbauforschung Volkenrode. 2014. N 64. P. 127–138. DOI: 10.3220/LBF_2014_127-138.Pelucha M., Kveton V. The role of EU rural development policy in the neo-productivist agricul- tural paradigm // Reg. Stud. 2017. N 51. P. 1860–1870. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608.Rizov M. Rural development under the European CAP: The role of diversity // Soc. Sci. J. 2005. N 42. P. 621–628. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2005.09.003.Pollermann K., Raue P., Schnaut G. Opportunities for a participative approach in rural develop- ment // Findings from LEADER in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and the requirements for Community Led Local Development Landbauforsch, Landbauforschung Volkenrode. 2014. N 64. P. 127–138. DOI: 10.3220/LBF_2014_127-138.Rosenberg N. On Technological Expectations // The Economic Journal. 1976. N 86 (343). P. 523–535.Rizov M. Rural development under the European CAP: The role of diversity // Soc. Sci. J. 2005. N 42. P. 621–628. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2005.09.003.Shmeleva N., Gamidullaeva L., Tolstykh T., Lazarenko D. Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Transfer Networks in the Context of Open Innovation: Russian Experience // J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021. N 7. P. 197. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7030197.Rosenberg N. On Technological Expectations // The Economic Journal. 1976. N 86 (343). P. 523–535.Shucksmith M, Cameron S., Merridew T., Pichler F. Urban-Rural Differences in Quality of Life across the European Union // Regional Studies. 2009. N 43 (10). P. 1275–1289. DOI: 10.1080/00343400802378750.Shmeleva N., Gamidullaeva L., Tolstykh T., Lazarenko D. Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Transfer Networks in the Context of Open Innovation: Russian Experience // J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021. N 7. P. 197. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7030197.Teece D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. N 28 (13). P. 1319–1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640.Shucksmith M., Cameron S., Merridew T., Pichler F. Urban-Rural Differences in Quality of Life across the European Union // Regional Studies. 2009. N 43 (10). P. 1275–1289. DOI: 10.1080/00343400802378750.Theodorakopoulos N., Sánchez P., Bennett D. Transferring technology from university to rural industry within a developing economy context: the case for nurturing communities of practice // Technovation 2012. N 32 (9–10). P. 550–559. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.05.001.Teece D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. N 28 (13). P. 1319–1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640.Tolstykh T., Gamidullaeva L., Shmeleva N. Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective // SAGE Open. 2021. N 11 (1). DOI: 10.1177/2158244020988704.Theodorakopoulos N., Sánchez P., Bennett D. Transferring technology from university to rural industry within a developing economy context: the case for nurturing communities of practice // Technovation 2012. N 32 (9–10). P. 550–559. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.05.001.Tolstykh T., Shmeleva N., Gamidullaeva L. Evaluation of Circular and Integration Potentials of Innovation Ecosystems for Industrial Sustainability // Sustainability. 2020. N 12 (11). P. 4574. DOI: 10.3390/su12114574.Tolstykh T., Gamidullaeva L., Shmeleva N. Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross- Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective // SAGE Open. 2021. N 11 (1). DOI: 10.1177/2158244020988704.Trabskaja J., Mets T. Ecosystem as the Source of Entrepreneurial Opportunities // Foresight and STI Governance. 2019. N 13 (4). P. 10–22. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.10.22.Tolstykh T., Shmeleva N., Gamidullaeva L. Evaluation of Circular and Integration Potentials of Innovation Ecosystems for Industrial Sustainability // Sustainability. 2020. N 12 (11). P. 4574. DOI: 10.3390/su12114574.Ushachev I. Agrarian policy of Russia: Problems and solutions. M. : V. V. Nasirddinov Publishing House, 2016. ISBN 978-5-905523-26-7.Trabskaja J., Mets T. Ecosystem as the Source of Entrepreneurial Opportunities // Foresight and STI Governance. 2019. N 13 (4). P. 10–22. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.10.22.Weber B., Jensen L., Miller K., Mosley J., Fisher M. A critical review of rural poverty literature: Is there truly a rural effect? // International Regional Science Review. 2005. N 28 (4). P. 381–414. DOI: 10.1177%2F0160017605278996.Ushachev I. Agrarian policy of Russia: Problems and solutions. M. : V. V. Nasirddinov Publishing House, 2016. ISBN 978-5-905523-26-7.Zemtsov S., Baburin V. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in the regions of Russia // Regional Studies. 2019. N 2. P. 4–14. DOI: 10.5922.1994-5280-2019-2-1.Weber B., Jensen L., Miller K., Mosley J., Fisher M. A critical review of rural poverty literature: Is there truly a rural effect? // International Regional Science Review. 2005. N 28 (4). P. 381– 414. DOI: 10.1177%2F0160017605278996.Zemtsov S., Baburin V. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in the regions of Russia // Regional Studies. 2019. N 2. P. 4–14. DOI: 10.5922.1994-5280-2019-2-1.Zemtsov S., Baburin V. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in the regions of Russia // Regional Studies. 2019. N 2. P. 4–14. DOI: 10.5922.1994-5280-2019-2-1.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.