<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">managementranepa</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленческое консультирование</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Administrative Consulting</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1726-1139</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1816-8590</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">TIIMQI</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">managementranepa-2993</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ, СТРАТЕГИРОВАНИЕ И УПРАВЛЕНИЕ РАЗВИТИЕМ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ СИСТЕМ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH, STRATEGIZING AND MANAGEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Общественное и международное разделение труда в научно-методологическом дискурсе о проблемах современного экономического развития</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Public and International Division of Labour in Scientific Discourse on the Problems of Modern Economic Development</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бойко</surname><given-names>И. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Boiko</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Бойко Ирина Викторовна, доктор экономических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры экономики</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Irina V. Boiko, Full Doctor in Economics, Professor, Professor of department of Economics</p><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">boyko-iv@ranepa.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Северо-Западный институт управления</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, North-West Institute of Management</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><elocation-id>83–94</elocation-id><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бойко И.В., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бойко И.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Boiko I.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/2993">https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/2993</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Устойчивость мировой экономики определяется многими факторами, среди которых углубление международного разделения труда играет ключевую роль, поскольку формирует комплементарные взаимосвязи между странами.</p><p>Целью исследования является обоснование того, что нарушение международного разделения труда является одной из главных причин усиления проблем в современном экономическом развитии.</p><p>В статье представлена научно-методологическая основа для исследования общественного (ОРТ) и международного (МРТ) разделения труда, обосновано положение, согласно которому реализация национального сравнительного преимущества каждой страны является условием для формирования гармоничных отношений в межстрановом экономическом взаимодействии.</p></sec><sec><title>Методы исследования</title><p>Методы исследования: единство исторического и логического, научное абстрагирование, системный подход, индукция и дедукция.</p><p>В результате исследования углубление степени технологического передела продукции определяется как фактор, способствующий углублению МРТ и — на этой основе — усилению интеграционного взаимодействия между странами. Приводится критика теорий «старого международного разделения труда» и «нового международного разделения труда». Анализируется отличие пространственного МРТ от отраслевого МРТ и обосновывается противоречие между ними. Исследуются современные мирохозяйственные процессы, свидетельствующие о нарушении принципов МРТ, обосновывается значение пространственного МРТ в повышении устойчивости современной экономики.</p><p>В качестве вывода утверждается, что в рамках пространственного МРТ могут быть реализованы принципы межстрановой комплементарности и конвергенции, что, в свою очередь, является условием обеспечения устойчивого роста мировой экономики.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>TIntroduction</title><p>TIntroduction. The development of an international division of labor (IDL), which supports complementarity and convergence between different countries is one of the key prerequisite for increasing resilience of the global economy.</p><p>The purpose of this article is to explain why the destruction of the basic principles of the international division of labor enforce the world economic problems.</p></sec><sec><title>Methodology</title><p>Methodology. The author presents the original research methodology for studying international trade relations and explains why “national comparative advantage” is fundamental for the harmonization of international economic relations. Method of analysis: a historical and logical, scientific one abstraction, system support, induction and deduction.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The depth of technological processing is a key factor in the further development of IDL and, on this basis, in strengthening the centripetal movement between countries and regions. The article presents a critical analysis of the “old international division of labor” and the “new international division of labor” theories. The article also analysis the IDL, configurated by industries and by space, explaining the contradictions between them that threaten national economic sovereignty and enforces trade contradictions between the different countries. The article presents symptoms indicating a destruction of the principles of IDL, explains the increasing role of the spatial IDL.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. The principles of the international complementarity and convergence are better realized in a case of spatial international division of labor, which, in turn, represents the main condition for the sustainable growth of the world economy.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>международное разделение труда</kwd><kwd>национальное сравнительное преимущество</kwd><kwd>комплементарность</kwd><kwd>конвергенция</kwd><kwd>технологическое развитие</kwd><kwd>национальная экономическая идентичность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>international division of labor</kwd><kwd>national comparative advantage</kwd><kwd>complementarity</kwd><kwd>convergence</kwd><kwd>technological development</kwd><kwd>national economic identity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бойко И. В. Экономика как система. Основы : учебник. М. : Инфра-Инженерия, 2026.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boiko I. V. Economics as the system. The basic building blocks. Moscow: Infra-Engineering, 2026. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Киреева А. В. Преимущества и недостатки международного разделения труда // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2025. № 4. C. 226–231. DOI 10.24412/2220-2404-2025-4-11; EDN ITUFOK</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ostrovityaninov K. V. The Political Economy. Moscow: Our Tomorrow, 1954 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Островитянов К. В. Политическая экономия. М. : Наше Завтра, 1954.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kireeva A. V. Advantages and Disadvantages of the International Division of Labour // Humanity, social, economic and public sciences [Gumanitarnii, social’no-economicheskie i obchestvenii nauki]. 2025. No. 4. P. 226–231. (In Russ.). DOI 10.24412/2220-2404-2025-4-11; EDN ITUFOK</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шишков Ю. В. Эволюция теорий международного разделения труда // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2009. № 2. C. 13–18. EDN JVYHWB</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shishkov Yu. V. The evolution of the international division of labor theories // World Economy and International Relations [Mirovaya economica i mezhdunarodnii otnosheniya]. 2009. No. 2. P. 13–18. (In Russ.). EDN ITUFOK</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Becker A., Hottenrott H., Mukherjee A. Division of labor in R&amp;D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research // Journal of Economic Behavior &amp; Organization. 2022. Vol. 194. P. 1–23. DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Becker A., Hottenrott H., Mukherjee A. Division of labor in R&amp;D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research // Journal of Economic Behavior &amp; Organization. 2022. Vol. 194. P. 1–23. DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boiko I. V. Technological reconstruction of the global economy // Globalization. London : IntechOpen, 2019. P. 1–23. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.75096</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boiko I. V. Technological reconstruction of the global economy // Globalization. London : IntechOpen, 2019. P. 1–23. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.75096</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Charnock G., Starosta G. Introduction: The New International Division of Labour and the Critique of Political Economy Today // The New International Division of Labour. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. P. 1–22. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53872-7_1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Charnock G., Starosta G. Introduction: The New International Division of Labour and the Critique of Political Economy Today // The New International Division of Labour. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. P. 1–22. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53872-7_1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eltis W. The Classical Theory of Economic growth. Second Edition. Palgrave, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eltis W. The Classical Theory of Economic growth. Second Edition. Palgrave, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Greenlaw St., Shapiro D., Taylor T. Principles of Microeconomics for AP Courses. 12th Media Services, 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Greenlaw St., Shapiro D., Taylor T. Principles of Microeconomics for AP Courses. 12th Media Services, 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lim K. F. International Division of Labor // The International Encyclopedia of geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology. Wiley-Association of American Geographers. 2015. P. 1–4. DOI 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1035</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lim K. F. International Division of Labor // The International Encyclopedia of geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology. Wiley-Association of American Geographers. 2015. P. 1–4. DOI 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1035</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meeteren M., Kleibert J. The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’ // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2022. Vol. 15, Iss. 2. P. 389–406. DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsac007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meeteren M., Kleibert J. The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’ // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2022. Vol. 15, Iss. 2. P. 389–406. DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsac007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morgan K. J. The Exaggerated death of geography [Электронный ресурс] // Geography. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 32–39. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291850331_The_exaggerated_death_of_geography (дата обращения: 13.09.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morgan K. J. The Exaggerated death of geography [Electronic Resource] // Geography. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 32–39. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291850331_The_exaggerated_death_of_geography (accessed date: 13.09.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Munger M. Division of Labor [Электронный ресурс] // EconLib. URL: https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/DivisionofLabor.html (дата обращения: 27.10.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Munger M. Division of Labor [Electronic Resource] // EconLib. URL: https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/DivisionofLabor.html (accessed date: 27.10.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Petras J. A New International Division of Labour? // MERIP. 1981. No. 94. P. 28–30. DOI 10.2307/3012258</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petras J. A New International Division of Labour? // MERIP. 1981. No. 94. P. 28–30. DOI 10.2307/3012258</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London, 1776.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London, 1776.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tyrdon M. International division of labour in the context of globalisation: The case of the Czech Republic // Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2010. Vol. 5 (14). Р. 359–369.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tyrdon M. International division of labour in the context of globalisation: The case of the Czech Republic // Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2010. Vol. 5 (14). Р. 359–369.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Veckov M. What would we do without division of labour? [Электронный ресурс] 2022. URL: https://www.adamsmithworks.org/speakings/veckov-division-of-labor-innovation (дата обращения: 26.10.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veckov M. What would we do without division of labour? [Electronic Resource] 2022. URL: https://www.adamsmithworks.org/speakings/veckov-division-of-labor-innovation (accessed date: 26.10.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang X., Fan J. The Basis for the International Division of Labor and International Trade Is Absolute Rather than Comparative Advantage // Theory and Empirical Evidence. World Review of Political Economy. 2024. Vol. 15 (3). P. 338–373. DOI 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.15.3.0338</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang X., Fan J. The Basis for the International Division of Labor and International Trade Is Absolute Rather than Comparative Advantage // Theory and Empirical Evidence. World Review of Political Economy. 2024. Vol. 15 (3). P. 338–373. DOI 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.15.3.0338</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
