Improving the Efficiency of Convergence of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-4-28-37
Abstract
The article is devoted to the formation, formation and development of the Eurasian Economic Union. As part of the study, a historical analysis of the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union, the main prerequisites for its origin, the stages of formation and the conditions of operation were carried out. In the work, based on the use of mathematical, statistical and comparative methods, an analysis was made of the economic indicators of the national member states of the Eurasian Economic Union, which resulted in the conclusion that the Russian Federation is the largest region that has 80% of the total potential of the Union. The paper discusses the basics of the formation of common markets for goods and services, which today are created in each field of activity of national economies. As a result of the analysis, factors that hinder the creation of common supranational systems and markets of national states were identified. The analysis made it possible to formulate proposals for further convergence of the types of economic activities of the national republics into a single supranational mechanism. At the end of the work conclusions are drawn from the results of the study.
About the Authors
A. A. GibadullinRussian Federation
Associate Professor at the Department of Economics and Management in the; Associate Professor at the Department of Energy, PhD in Economics
Moscow, Russian Federation
V. N. Pulyaevа
Associate Professor of the Department Personnel Management and
Psychology, PhD in Economics
Moscow, Russian Federation
S. I. Bortalevich
Chief Researcher, Doctor of Science (Economics), Associate Professor
Moscow, Russian Federation
References
1. Gibadullin A.A., Pulyaev V.N., Erygin Yu.V. Conceptual directions of sustainable development of the Eurasian Economic Union. M .: Publishing house GUU, 2018. 158 p. (In rus)
2. Gibadullin A.A. Technical and technological state of fixed assets of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union // Bulletin of the Moscow International Higher Business School (MIRBIS) [Vestnik Moskovskoy mezhdunarodnoy vysshey shkoly biznesa (MIRBIS)]. 2018. N 1 (13). P. 6-11. (In rus)
3. Zakharova N.V., Labudin A.V. World market of high technologies: some features and perspectives // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoye konsul'tirovaniye]. 2016. N 4. P. 104–115. (In rus)
4. Ziyadullaev N.S. EEU: Between Politics and Economics // Problems of Theory and Practice of Management [Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya]. 2014. N 11. P. 25-37. (In rus)
5. Kamchatova E. Yu. Innovative development of dominant companies in the modern Russian economy on the example of the electric power industry // Integra [Integral]. 2014. N 4 (77). P. 59. (In rus)
6. Laznik, A.A., Linnik, V.Yu. Identifying areas of best practice in managing EPC (M) projects based on an analysis of the global market // University Bulletin (State University of Management) [Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya)]. 2017. N 6. Pp. 37-42. (In rus)
7. Merenkov A.O. Industry 4.0: German experience in the development of digital transport and logistics // Management [Upravleniye]. 2017. Vol. 5. N 4. P. 17-21. (In rus)
8. Merenkov A.O. Digital Economy in Transport and Intelligent Transport Systems // Transport: science, technology, management [Transport: nauka, tekhnika, upravleniye]. 2018. N 4. P. 14-18. (In rus)
9. Tikhonov Yu.P. On the evaluation of losses from the freezing of capital investments // Construction Economics [Ekonomika stroitel'stva]. 2018. N 3 (51). P. 66-77. (In rus)
10. Kharitonov V.N. Formation of a system of corporate knowledge management as a factor in the sustainable development of an organization // Scientific and Technical Gazette of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Economics [Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskiye nauki]. 2011. N 4. P. 165–169. (In rus)
11. Sharipov F.F. On the need for state planning of development directions of the production infrastructure taking into account spatial factors // Lviv Readings - 2017 Collection of Articles V of the All-Russian Scientific Conference. Under the editorship of G. B. Kleiner [L'vovskiye chteniya - 2017 Sbornik statey V Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Pod nauchnoy redaktsiyey G.B. Kleynera]. 2017. P. 178-180. (In rus)
12. Sharipov F.F. Evolution of ideas about the spatial organization of the economy // University Bulletin (State University of Management) [Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya)]. 2017. N 10. P. 80-87. (In rus)
13. Sharipov, F.F., Timofeev, O.A. Infrastructure approach as an innovative method of development of the territories of the Russian Federation // University Bulletin (State University of Management) [Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya)]. 2016. N 3. P. 177-181. (In rus)
14. Alferova T., Shilova E., Tretiakova E. Methodical approaches // European Research Studies Journal. 2015. Vol. 18. N 3. P. 115-128.
15. Biryukov V.V., Romanenko E.V. Indigenous Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 9. N 12. P. 89.
16. Gibadullin A.A., Bortalevich S.I., Yerygin Y.V. Dynamic Invariance of the Electric Power System // Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 2019. Vol. 47. Pp. 299-302.
17. Gibadullin A.A., Pulyaeva V.N., Yerygin Y.V. The Digitalization of Energy Substation during the Digitalization of Energy // International Conference of Relay Protection and Automation, RPA. 2018. Pp. 8537223.
18. Veselovsky M.Y., Menshikova M.A., Gnezdova J.V., Izmailova M.A., Romanova J.A. The International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 20. P. 41172-41177.
Review
For citations:
Gibadullin A.A., Pulyaevа V.N., Bortalevich S.I. Improving the Efficiency of Convergence of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(4):28-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-4-28-37