Problem of the Sovereignty and Economic Decisions Adoption in the Union State: Some Questions of the Theory and Practice of 2018–2019
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-8-15
Abstract
The concept of sovereignty is a through and general scientifc problem now. In relation to the Russian-Belarusian relations, frst it is connected with questions of economic sovereignty. In ideal option the solution of theoretical questions and practical actions in the sphere of integration have to be carried on time. However in practice it turns out not always. Understanding of economic sovereignty during an era of globalization 2.0. — a difcult task for theorists and practitioners. How to combine traditions of sovereignty and need of integration deepening? This article is devoted to these questions.
About the Authors
V. A. Shamakhov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Shamakhov, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor, Director
St. Petersburg
N. М. Mezhevich
St. Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Professor of St. Petersburg State University of Economics, President of the Russian Association of Baltic Studies (RABS), Doctor of Science (Economics)
St. Petersburg
References
1. Alekseenkova E. S. “The restored sovereignty” as the basis of national pride // International life [Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’]. 2018. No. 6. P. 98–111. (In rus)
2. Burenin A. V., Igoshin I. N. Geoeconomy and economic sovereignty. M., 2007. (In rus)
3. Kizima S. A., Bakin A. I. System aspects of the organization and functioning of the European Union // European Union: history, policy, economy, law [Evropeiskii soyuz: istoriya, politika, ekonomika, pravo] : international scientifc and practical conference (on December 17–18, 1997, Minsk): Collection of scientifc works. Minsk : Belarusian State University, 1998. (In rus)
4. Lafontaine O. Society of the future: policy of reforms in the changing world. M., 1990. (In rus)
5. Lepeshkin A. I. Soviet federalism. M. : Legal literature, 1977. (In rus)
6. Marchenko M. N. Problems of the general theory of the state and law. V. 1. M., 2016. (In rus)
7. Mataev T. M. State as carrier of economic sovereignty // Questions of economy and law [Voprosy ekonomiki i prava]. 2013. No. 60. P. 19–22. (In rus)
8. Pastukhova N. B. Features of the state sovereignty of participants of the Union State of Russia and Belarus // Lex Russica. 2017. No. 1 (122). P. 198–206. (In rus)
9. Pereslegin S. B. About the concept of “the virtual state” [An electronic resource]. URL: http:// www.igstab.ru/materials/Pereslegin/Per_Virtu.htm (In rus)
10. Chernichenko S. V. Whether the state sovereignty is divisible? // Eurasian legal journal [Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal]. 2010. No. 12. P. 25–31. (In rus)
11. Shabaylov V. I. Union State: organizational and legal problems of formation and development. Minsk : MITSO, 2014. (In rus)
12. Byers M. Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2001.
13. Byers M. War Law: International Law and Armed Conflict. London : Atlantic Books, 2005.
14. Schermers G. International Institutional Law. L., 1980.
Review
For citations:
Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.М. Problem of the Sovereignty and Economic Decisions Adoption in the Union State: Some Questions of the Theory and Practice of 2018–2019. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(2):8-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-8-15
Views:
445
Email this article 