Role of Institute of Leadership in Formation of Political Culture in the Conditions of Sovereignty
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-3-34-40
Abstract
This article analyzes the role of the institution of leadership in the formation of a new political culture in conditions of sovereignty. It should be noted that experience shows that the institution of leadership has really had a decisive influence on the whole further course of development of social and political processes in society. As a result, an activist type of political culture based on democratic principles emerged and affirmed in society.
The culture of participation as the main element of human culture in general was characterized by rationality, awareness and expediency. At the same time, it is necessary to know that the level of perception of new cultural values depends on the level of political culture of the political leader itself, since any leader is a reflection of the cultural environment in which it was formed.
Keywords
About the Author
Abdujabbor S. Gafforzoda
Institute of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Head of Human Resource and Special Affairs Department; Researcher of Tajik State Pedagogical University named after Sadriddin Aini
Dushanbe
References
1. Blondel J. Political Leadership. M., 1992. 135 p. (In rus)
2. Denisov V. V. Political culture: theory and practice // Philosophy and society [Filosofiya i obshchestvo]. 2006. N 1. P. 19-31. (In rus)
3. Dubinin N. P. Inheritance biological and social // Communist [Kommunist]. 1980. N 11. P. 62-74. (In rus)
4. Makhmadov A. N. Rhetoric and political polemic. Dushanbe, 2015. 192 p. (In rus)
5. Makhmadov A. N., Khopyorskaya L. L. National reconciliation: prospects of development of the sovereign Tajik state. Dushanbe, 2017. 168 p. (In rus)
6. Hidirzoda M. U. Leadership and management of socio-political processes. Dushanbe, 2018. 168 p. (In rus)
7. Hidirova M. U. Institute of leadership in the context of transformational society. Dushanbe, 2009. 170 p. (In rus)
8. Hidirova M. U. Political behavior and its features. Dushanbe, 2007. 139 p. (In rus)
9. Ranmonov E. Sh. Tajiks always and today. Dushanbe, 1997. (In Uzb)
Review
For citations:
Gafforzoda A.S. Role of Institute of Leadership in Formation of Political Culture in the Conditions of Sovereignty. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(3):34-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-3-34-40
Views:
538
Email this article 