Social Influence on the User in Social Network: Types of Communications in Assessment of the Behavioral Risks connected with the Socio-engineering Attacks

The purpose of this study is to study the impact of possible types of relationships between users, which are represented in the social network “VKontakte”, on the probability of the spread of a social engineering attack.

Methods. To achieve this goal, a survey was developed and a web page was created, which is used to collect responses from respondents. After receiving the data, the obtained results were analyzed using the tools available in Microsoft Excel. In addition, for more in-depth analysis of the results, a C program was developed, which calculates the necessary characteristics and outputs the results to an Excel document.

Results. In analyzing the results of the survey, the types of relationships between users were identified, in which they are more likely to respond to the request. It was also revealed that the answers are most often found in which several or even all categories in groups of relationship types between users were assigned the same assessments of the degree of readiness to respond to a request. In addition, it is worth noting that there are often answers in which respondents identified only one of the presented communication options.

Conclusion. According to the study, it was hypothesized that the assessments of the degree of readiness to respond to a request to join the community for different groups of relationships are different, but the intragroup assessments differ little. The results obtained, demonstrating the lack of differentiation of values within groups of types of relationships, are significant, but at the same time, a deeper study of the orders that can be traced in the responses of a number of respondents is required.

1. Abramov M. V., Tulupyev A. L., Suleymanov A. A. Analysis of users’ protection from socio-engineering attacks: social graph creation based on information from social network websites // Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics [Nauchnotekhnicheskii vestnik informatsionnykh tekhnologii, mekhaniki i optiki]. 2018. V. 18. N 2. P. 313– 321. (In rus)

2. Azarov A. A., Tulupyeva T. V., Suvorova A. V., Tulupyev A. L. at al. Socio-engineering attacks: analysis problems. SPb. : Science, 2016. (In rus)

3. Zinenko O. Relevant cyberthreats: trends and forecasts // Positive Technologies [Positive Technologies]. 2018. P. 12–15. (In rus)

4. Katalkov D. As the social engineering opens for the hacker of a door in your organization // Positive Technologies [Positive Technologies]. 2018. P. 26–30. (In rus)

5. Kolesnikov G. I., Hovanov N. V., Yudayeva M. S. Application of a method of quantification of non-numerical estimates of probability for the choice of an optimal portfolio of securities // Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University. Series 5. Economy [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Ekonomika]. 2007. N 3. P. 58–67. (In rus)

6. Hovanov N. V. Article about creation of rating of the Russian scientific journals as an occasion to think about general principles of application of a method of summary indicators // Management of big systems: collection of works [Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami: sbornik trudov]. 2009. N 27. P. 76–80. (In rus)

7. Hovanov N. V., Fedotov Yu. V. Model of accounting of uncertainty at creation of summary indicators of efficiency of activity of complex production systems // Scientific reports [Nauchnye doklady]. 2006. N 28R-2006. (In rus)

8. Bapna R., Gupta A., Rice S., Sundararajan A. Trust and the Strength of Ties in Online Social Networks: An Exploratory Field Experiment // MIS Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 41. N 1. P. 115–130.

9. Beam M. A., Child J. T., Hutchens M. J., Hmielowski J. D. Context collapse and privacy management: Diversity in Facebook friends increases online news reading and sharing // New media & society. 2017. Vol. 20. N 7. P. 2296–2314.

10. Bogaert M., Ballings M., Van den Poel D. Evaluating the importance of different communication types in romantic tie prediction on social media // Annals of Operations Research. 2018. Vol. 263. N 1–2. P. 501–527.

11. Cadena M., Hoffman M., Gallardo R. A., Figueroa A. at al. Using social network analysis to characterize the collaboration network of backyard poultry trainers in ackCalifornia // Preventive veterinary medicine. 2018. Т. 158. P. 129–136.

12. Chang H. T., Li Y. W., Mishra N. mCAF: a multi-dimensional clustering algorithm for friends of social network services // SpringerPlus. 2016. Vol. 5. N 1. P. 757.

13. Gillath O., Karantzas G. C., Selcuk E. A Net of Friends: Investigating Friendship by Integrating Attachment Theory and Social Network Analysis // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2017. Vol. 43. N 11. P. 1546–1565.

14. Karimi F., Matous P. Mapping diversity and inclusion in student societies: A social network perspective // Computers in Human Behavior. 2018. Т. 88. P. 184–194.

15. Krakan S., Humski L., Skočir Z. Determination of friendship intensity between online social network users based on their interaction // Tehnički vjesnik. 2018. Vol. 25. N 3. P. 655–662.

16. Liberatore F., Quijano-Sanchez L. What do we really need to compute the Tie Strength? An empirical study applied to Social Networks // Computer Communications. 2017. Vol. 110. P. 59–74.

17. Lisbôa E. S., Coutinho C. P. SNA: a framework for analyzing interaction in a social network // EDULEARN13 Proceedings. IATED 2013. P. 6549–6555.

18. Maiz A., Arranz N., Fdez. de Arroyabe J. C. Factors affecting social interaction on social network sites: the Facebook case // Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2016. Vol. 29. N 5. P. 630–649.

19. Mattie H., Engø-Monsen K., Ling R., Onnela J. P. Understanding tie strength in social networks using a local “bow tie” framework // Scientific Reports. 2018. Vol. 8. N 1. P. 9349.

20. Suleimanov A., Abramov M., Tulupyev A. Modelling of the social engineering attacks based on social graph of employees communications analysis // Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS). SPb., 2018. P. 801–805.