Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Oath as Factor of Ensuring Sovereignty of Russia

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-4-99-106

Abstract

In the article, reveal a problem of ensuring political sovereignty of Russia in the conditions of uneven, contradictory and dynamic socio-political and economic world development. The sharpness of a problem is connected with decrease in level of the public administration caused on the one hand — easing of responsibility of public servants and preservation of high level of corruption in public authorities. With another, — with calls of the “fourth” technological revolution. The major consequence of which information technology development and formations of “digital” economy is. One of the major conditions, according to the author, ensuring political sovereignty of the Russian Federation, in particular, of its modern form, “information” sovereignty, is introductions of institute of the oath in public service, and first of all in civil. The institute of the oath as the world practice on the example of its application in a number of the states, introduced in the Russian political practice shows, will allow lowering, according to the author, the level of the negative phenomena as irresponsibility and corruption in civil public service and will allow providing higher quality of public administration.

About the Author

K. A. Kaveev
North-West institute of management of RANEPA
Russian Federation

Associate Professor of the Chair of State and Municipal Management, PhD in Philosophy

St. Petersburg, Russian Federation



References

1. Bredikhin A. L. Sovereignty as political and legal phenomenon. M., 2012. (In rus)

2. Kalamanova S. V. Sovereignty of the state in the conditions of globalization: yew. … edging. юрид. sciences. M., 2011. (In rus)

3. Karnaushchenko L. V. Sovereignty of the national state in the conditions of globalization processes // Society and law [Obshchestvo i pravo]. 2015. N 3. P. 9–13. (In rus)

4. Larina N. A. Organizational culture in public authorities and local government // Science and education: problems and prospects of development: collection of articles on materials of the International scientific and practical conference on August 30, 2014. Part 2. Tambov, 2014. P. 91–93. (In rus)

5. Merkulov V. M. Coordination in politics and administration // Public service. The bulletin of Coordination Council on personnel questions, the state awards and public service at the Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Northwestern Federal District [Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. Vestnik Koordinatsionnogo Soveta po kadrovym voprosam, gosudarstvennym nagradam i gosudarstvennoi sluzhbe pri polnomochnom predstavitele Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii v Severo-Zapadnom federal’nom okruge]. 2010. N 2. P. 52–63. (In rus)

6. Rossoshanskiy A. V. Political and information sovereignty in the context of globalization processes // Simbirsk scientific journal [Simbirskii nauchnyi vestnik]. 2011. N 4. P. 176–186. (In rus)

7. Fedorov A.Yu., Alimpiyev S. A. Corruption in Russia: public danger, counteraction problems // Jurisprudence and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs [Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii]. 2010. N 1. P. 235–238. (In rus)


Review

For citations:


Kaveev K.A. Oath as Factor of Ensuring Sovereignty of Russia. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(4):99-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-4-99-106

Views: 503


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)