A Power State: To Build a Theoretical Model
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-4-114-122
Abstract
The author, based on the methods of discourse analysis and comparative approach, presents the author’s interpretation of the attributes of a power state in its modern interpretation. The article reveals the relationship of specific definitions of a power state with the original methodological and ideological positions of researchers. The author comes to the conclusion that the interpretations of a power state often begin to dominate not so much scientific criteria, as ethical and psychological characteristics of the desirable model of a power state, often in a metaphorical form. Hence the need to objectify the signs and properties of the supposedly power state of the 21st century.
About the Author
L. P. Belov
North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA
LLC “Gelios”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
LLC “Gelios”, CEO, Graduate student
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
References
1. Aubakirova I. U. The concept of the strong state in a discourse about management in state and organized society // Juridical Thought [Yuridicheskaya mysl’]. 2014. N 5(85). P. 5–13. (In rus)
2. Belevskaya Yu. Yu., Yefimov Yu. G., Chagilov V. R., Degoyev V. V. Strong state: index assessment // Messenger of Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University [Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta]. 2016. N 4. P. 135–144. (In rus)
3. Bernatsky G. G. The strong state is impossible without ideology // Scientific notes of law faculty [Uchenye zapiski yuridicheskogo fakul’teta]. 2013. N 31 (41). P. 9a–13. (In rus)
4. Zatonsky V. A. Strong state and active personality: theoretical and legal aspect. Saratov, 2005. (In rus)
5. Kerimov A. D., Kuksin I. N. The strong state as the defining social progress factor. M. : Norma : INFRA-M, 2018. P. 73–93. (In rus)
6. Kerimov A. D., Kuksin I. N. Criteria of force of the state // Law and education [Pravo i obrazovanie]. 2016. N 6. P. 4–16. (In rus)
7. Kolesnikov V. N. The relevant agenda in modern Russia: formation factors // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2017. N 9. P. 8–17. (In rus)
8. Korotkova O. I. The strong power as the predetermining factor on the way of formation of the Russian constitutional state // Russian judge [Rossiiskii sud’ya]. 2009. N 6. P. 28–30. (In rus)
9. Levanchuk V. A. Assessment of impartiality, equality and orientation for the public good in various methods of measurement of quality of a deliberation // Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 12. Political sciences [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki]. 2016. N 1. P. 51–69. (In rus)
10. Lyubashits V.Ya., Razuvaev N. V. Evolution of the state: historical dynamics and theoretical model: monograph / V.Ya. Lyubashits, N. V. Razuvaev. M. : RIOR : INFRA-M, 2018. 532 p. (In rus)
11. Miller A. I. Steady factors of weakness of the state during an era of globalization (paper) // Political science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2011. N 2. P. 268. (In rus)
12. Moral state. From the theory to Project / Sulakshin S. S., Bagdasaryan V. E., Vilisov M. V., Netesova M. S., Ponomareva E. G., Sazonova E. S., Spiridonova V. I. / under a general edition of S. S. Sulakshin. M. : Science and policy, 2015. 424 p. (In rus)
13. Petrov K. E. Domination of conceptual polysemy: the strong state in the Russian political discourse // Political researches [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2006. N 3. P. 159–183. (In rus)
14. Political atlas of the present: Experience of the multidimensional statistical analysis of political systems of the modern states. M. : MGIMO University, 2007. 272 p. (In rus)
15. Ponkin I. V. Strong state // Law and state [Pravo i gosudarstvo]. 2018. N 1–2 (78–79). P. 55–56. (In rus)
16. Popova O. V. The new directions of use of difficult methods in the analysis of political processes // Political science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2015. N 2. P. 62–79. (In rus)
17. Remington T. F. Russia and ideal of “strong state” // Constitutional law: East European review [Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoe obozrenie]. 2000. N 2. P. 58–61. (In rus)
18. Fukuyama F. Strong state: management and a world order in the 21st century M. : AST KEEPER, 2007. (In rus)
19. Mann M. The Sources of Social Power: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. UK, Cambridge University Press, 1993. Vol. II. P. 59–61.
20. Persistent state weakness in the global age / D. Kostovicova, V. Bojicic-Dzelilovic (eds.). Farnham: Ashgate, 2009. Излагается по переводу А. Миллера. Миллер А. И. Указ. соч. С. 268.
21. Simon J. Law’s Violence, the Strong State, and the Crisis of Mass Imprisonment (for Stuart Hall) // Wake Forest Law Review. 2014. Vol. 49. P. 649–676.
22. Sorensen G. Democracy, authoritarianism and state strength // The European Journal of Development Research. 1993. Vol. 5. P. 6–34.
Review
For citations:
Belov L.P. A Power State: To Build a Theoretical Model. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(4):114-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-4-114-122
Views:
652
Email this article 