Instruments of the Influence of System-forming Political Parties on the Enhancing the Legitimacy of the Russian Electoral Process
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-5-151-159
Abstract
The author analyzes the role of system-forming political parties and instruments of their influence on the increasing the legitimacy of the electoral process in Russia. The study is based on an actororiented approach, in which parties are considered as actors of the political system, whose activities and technologies can have a positive impact on the course of democratization and increasing legitimacy. The author defines the mechanisms introduced by the parties aimed to increase the openness of the elections and involve more people to take part in the elections.
The results of the analysis show that in the modern life parties have opportunities and are interested to increase legitimacy of the Russian electoral system. In the conditions when the attitude to the elections of the population is not always positive, the parties become an institution capable of offering and developing tools aimed to enhance democracy, openness and justice of the electoral process.
About the Author
O. N. ShalashovaRussian Federation
Olga N. Shalashova, Chairman
References
1. Balashov A. I., Kovalev A. A. Project management as a methodical basis of ensuring military safety of Russia at the present stage // National interests: priorities and safety [Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’]. 2018. V. 14. No. 6 (363). P. 1151–1165. (In rus)
2. Borisov I.B. Public control on elections as a factor of legitimacy of the power // Legal world [Yuridicheskii mir]. 2012. No. 9. P. 58–61. (In rus)
3. Velichinskaya Yu. N. Primaries: democratic value, application problems in domestic selective practice, prospects of an institutionalization // Constitutional and municipal law [Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo]. 2015. No. 8. P. 29–36. (In rus)
4. Gelman V.Ya. “Constituent elections” in the context of the Russian transformation // Social sciences and the present [Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’]. 1999. No. 6. P. 46–64. (In rus)
5. Gelman V.Ya. Political parties in Russia: from the competition — to hierarchy // Political researches [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2008. No. 5. P. 135–152. (In rus)
6. Grishina M. V. About some questions of legal regulation of information support of elections in 2016 // Electoral law and practice [Izbiratel’noe zakonodatel’stvo i praktika]. 2016. N 1. P. 19– 22. (In rus)
7. Grudinin N.S. Violations of electoral rights of citizens on elections in Russia and a way of their prevention // News of Higher Educational Institutions [Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii]. 2014. No. 10. P. 25–34. (In rus)
8. Komarova V.V. Political parties in modern Russia (an institutionalization problem) // Law Problems [Problemy prava]. 2014. No. 2. P. 9. (In rus)
9. Makarenko B. I. Postcommunist countries: some results of transformation // Politia [Politiya]. 2008. No. 3. P. 105–124. (In rus)
10. Makartsev A. A. Legitimacy of elections: mechanisms of legal support // Russian law journal [Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal]. 2013. No. 5. P. 124–130. (In rus)
11. Meyer M. M. State Duma elections 2016 // Power [Vlast’]. 2016. N 6. P. 15–27. (In rus)
12. Salikov M.S. Party system of Russia: dynamics of constitutional and legal regulation // Russian law journal [Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal]. 2012. No. 4. P. 148–156. (In rus)
13. Wallerstein M. Electoral systems, parties and political stability // Political researches [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 1992. No. 5. P. 156–162. (In rus)
14. Holodkovsky K.G. Social and psychological differentiation of the Russian population and process of formation of parties // Political researches [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2001. N 5. P. 75–96. (In rus)
15. Bielasiak J. Regime Diversity and Electoral Systems in Post-Communism // Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. 2006. N 22/4. P. 407–430.
16. Colomer J. Strategic Transitions. Game Theory and Democratization. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. P. 18–37.
17. Duverger M. Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. Methuen, 1959. P. 159.
18. Lawson K., Römmele A., Karasimeonov G. Cleavages, parties, and voters: studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Greenwood Publishing Group, 1999. P. 127.
19. Linz J., Stepan A. Problems of Democratic Transitions and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. P. 42–53.
20. Lipset S. M. Social conflict, legitimacy, and democracy. Comparative Government, 1969. P. 52– 59.
21. Merkl P.Which Are Today’s Democracies? // International Social Science Journal. 1993. Vol. 45. P. 257–258.
22. O’Donnell G., Schmitter P. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. P. 35–40.
23. Przeworski A. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press, 1992. P. 58–75.
24. Sartori G. Parties and party system: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, 1976. P. 187.
25. Schumpeter J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge, 2010. P. 221.
Review
For citations:
Shalashova O.N. Instruments of the Influence of System-forming Political Parties on the Enhancing the Legitimacy of the Russian Electoral Process. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(5):151-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-5-151-159