On European Experience in Eurasian Integration
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-3-47-53
Abstract
European experience of integration is important not only as a set of “best practices,” but also as a way to take into account negative experience of European integration. It is necessary to achieve the most thorough, ideologically neutral study of the unique European experience. The key point is the transition from economic integration to political integration. It is this point that is extremely important for the Eurasian Economic Union. Attempts of forced transition from economic integration to political integration have created problems for the European Union, and their complexity has been underestimated. Effective integration into the EAEU is possible and effective within the economic field, but the political space of integration today can rather be compared to the minefield, good experience of movement on which is accumulated in Brussels.
About the Authors
V. A. ShamakhovRussian Federation
Vladimir A. Shamakhov - Director of North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor.
St. Petersburg
N. M. Mezhevich
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Chief Researcher of Institute of Europe of RAS, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor.
Moscow
References
1. Bolgova I., Nikitina Yu. Eurasian Economic Union between Integration and Sovereignty // Modern Europe [Sovremennaya Evropa]. 2019. No. 5. P 13-22. (In rus)
2. Borko Yu. A. Europe XXI: further up or further down? [Electronic resource] // European security [Evropeiskaya bezopasnost’]. 2011. No. 26 (42). URL: http: //rudocs.exdat.com/docs/in-dex-564845.html (In rus)
3. Busygina I. M. Asymmetric Integration in the European Union // International Processes [Mezh-dunarodnye protsessy]. 2007. V. 5. No. 3 (15). P 18-27. (In rus)
4. Gromyko Al A. Introduction. Has the “European dream” died? 21st century Europe. New challenges and risks / under General. Al. A. Gromyko, V. P Fedorov. M., SPb. : Nestor-History, 2017. (In rus)
5. Eurasian Union: a challenge for the European Union and Eastern Partnership states. Vilnius: Centre for Eastern European Studies, 2012. (In rus)
6. Zonova T. V. From Europe of states to Europe of regions // Polis. 1999. No. 5. P 155-164. (In rus)
7. Ivanov I. D. Europe of regions. M., 1998. (In rus)
8. Karaganov S. A. Russian politics in the era of globalization // Russia in global politics [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. 2003. V. 1, No. 2. P 10-20. (In rus)
9. Kuzmina E. M. Economic development of the EAEU countries and prospects for economic integration until 2025. M. : Non-profit partnership “Russian Council for International Affairs”, 2017. (In rus)
10. Portansky A. P Freedom of Trade is an all-time goal // Wilson ‘s “14 points” a century later: how to re-establish the world order. M. : Center for Strategic Development, 2018. (In rus)
11. Rogov S. M. Isolation from Integration // Foreign Policy and Security of Modern Russia, 19912002: chrestomy: in 4 volumes / Moscow. State Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Russian Association of International Researches, “ISE Center (Information. Science. Education.)”; Collection of T A. Shakleina. M. : ROSSPEN, 2002. V. 1. (In rus)
12. Conquest R. Reflections on a Ravaged Century, New York : W. W. Norton, 2000.
13. Dumont G.-F. Les racines de l’identite europeenne, Paris: Economica, 1999.
14. Machlup F. A. History of Thought on Economic Integration. L., 1977.
15. Nielson B., Stubb A. The European Union: Reading on the Theory and History of European Integration. Boulder, 2003.
16. Wallace W. The Dynamics of European Integration. L., 1990.
Review
For citations:
Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.M. On European Experience in Eurasian Integration. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(3):47-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-3-47-53