Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Institutional Analysis of the Russian Electoral System

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-3-99-109

Abstract

The purpose of this article is an institutional analysis of the factors that hinder the institutionalization of elections in contemporary Russia. Theoretical basis of the study are the behaviorism theory considered in the context of elections, as well as the theory of formal and informal institutions. The framework for the analysis of the electoral system of the Russian Federation was formed on the basis of these theories. The theories of behaviorism and formal and informal institutions make it possible to divide elections into constituents, which together with the analysis of changes in electoral legislation and the study of the actions of government agencies solves the key research issue of this paper. On the basis of theoretical analysis, a number of conclusions were drawn about the

electoral system in the Russian Federation as an institution of political life. In particular, the factors preventing the development of elections as one of the fundamental components of the democratic way of life in the state were highlighted. These include: the existing social conformism in society regarding the electoral process; considering elections as a way of fighting between competing political actors and parties rather than as a democratic mechanism to express the interests of the people; relatively frequent changes in the legislation governing elections, especially when these changes are not accompanied by additional measures aimed at conveying the motives of government actions to citizens; manipulation of elections, which is possible thanks to the fact that they are not accompanied by additional measures. The study shows that these factors increase the tendencies to absentism, strengthen the role of incubator, but reduce the institutional capacity of elections.

About the Author

O. N. Shalashova
Territorial election commission N 3
Russian Federation

Olga N. Shalashova – Chairman.

Saint-Petersburg


References

1. Gelman V. J. Institution building and informal institutions in modern Russian politics // Political researches [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2003. No. 4. P 6-25. (In rus)

2. Gelman V. J. “Subversive” institutions and informal governance in modern Russia // Politiya [Politiya]. 2010. No. 2 (57). P 6-24. (In rus)

3. Golosov G. V. Integrity of elections and voter turnout in conditions of authoritarianism // Political science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2019. No. 1. P 67-89. (In rus)

4. Zavadskaya M. A., Bederson V. D. Who and How Estimates Elections: Peculiarities of Expert Survey of the Quality of Regional Elections on September 13, 2015 in Russia // World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology [Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya]. 2018. No. 3. P. 82-106. (In rus)

5. Zaostrovtsev A. P XVIII Leontievsky readings: “Institutional economic theory: history, problems and prospects” // Economic policy [Ekonomicheskaya politika]. 2019. No. 2. P 178-191. (In rus)

6. Ivanova E. N. Electoral systems during elections to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation // Journal of the IIEL [Vestnik MIEP]. 2017. No. 2 (27). P. 9-16. (In rus)

7. Ivanova M. V. Effects of changing electoral legislation and party representation: regional, national and business elites // Political science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2015. No. 1. P 114-127. (In rus)

8. Maykova E.Y, Simonova V. V. Institute of Municipal Elections in Modern Russia: Problems and Prospects of Development // Power [Vlast’]. 2019. No. 5. P 19-27. (In rus)

9. Mamonov M. V., Gavrilov I. V., Viadro M. A. Imitation characteristics of the 2018 presidential election and their impact on the next electoral cycle: the results of opinion polls // Monitoring [Monitoring]. 2018. No. 4 (146). P 124-147. (In rus)

10. Petukhov V. V. Elections to the State Duma of Russia against the background of institutional crisis // Power [Vlast’]. 2016. No. 7. P 22-27. (In rus)

11. Ross K. Russian Elections and Electoral Signaling // Political Science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2017. №4. P 34-60. (In rus)

12. Turovskiy R. F. Presidential elections in Russia: opportunities and limits of electoral consolidation // Politiya [Politiya]. 2018. No. 2 (89). P 23-50. (In rus)

13. Shamakhov V. A., Balashov A. I. New social and political normality and lessons of modernization of the post-Soviet system of public administration // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2016. No. 12(96). P 6-15. (In rus)

14. Khalil-Zade F. A. Political elections as an element of democracy // Journal of RIAT [Vestnik RMAT]. 2016. No. 4. P 21-26. (In rus)

15. Bechtel M. M. Not Always Second Order: Subnational Elections, National-Level Vote Intentions, and Volatility Spillovers in a Multilevel Electoral System (October 7, 2011). Electoral Studies. Vol. 31. N 1. P 170-183.

16. Bendor J., Diermeier D., Siegel D., Ting M. A. Behavioral Theory of Elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2011.

17. Coleman S. Russian Election Reform and the Effect of Social Conformity on Voting and the Party System: 2007 and 2008. Journal of the New Economic Association. New Economic Association. issue 5, 2010. P. 73-90.

18. Colton T J. Wither Russia? Twenty-Five Years After the Collapse of Communism Comparative Politics. Vol. 50. N 3. 2018. P 455-473.

19. B*kken H. Selections before elections: Double standards in implementing election registration procedures in Russia? Communist and Post-Communist Studies. N 48, Issue 1, 2015. P 61-70.

20. Helmke G., Levitsky S. Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda Perspectives on Politics 2. N 4. 2004. P. 725-740.

21. Miller A.H., Reisinger W.M., Hesli V. I. The Russian 1996 presidential election: referendum on democracy or a personality contest? Electoral Studies. Vol. 17. Is. 2. 1998. P 175-196.

22. Norris P Do Institutions Matter? The Consequences of Electoral Reform for Political Participation. Rethinking the Vote. Oxford University Press, 2003.

23. Pammett J. H., DeBardeleben J. The meaning of elections in transitional democracies: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine, Electoral Studies. N 15. Is. 3. 1996. P 363-381.

24. Ross C. Regional elections in Russia: instruments of authoritarian legitimacy or instability? Palgrave Communication. 2018. N 4. Vol. 75. P 1-19.

25. Stoner K. Wither Russia? Twenty-Five Years After the Collapse of Communism Comparative Politics. 2018. Vol. 50. N 3. P 295-303.

26. Taagepera R., Shugart M. S. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, 1989.

27. Visser M. Five theories of voting action: strategy and structure of psychological explanation. Enschede : Universiteit Twente, 1998.


Review

For citations:


Shalashova O.N. Institutional Analysis of the Russian Electoral System. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(3):99-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-3-99-109

Views: 636


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)