Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

The Classification of Contemporary Political Elites

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-5-19-28

Abstract

The purpose of the article is classification of contemporary political elites. The main steps to achieve this goal are to study the prerequisites for the emergence of the political elite as such, to consider the essence of the political elite in a state, to classify approaches to the definition of the political elite, to define the key types of political elites of today. The method of research is generalized theoretical analysis and systematization. The conducted theoretical analysis has defined the research question and problem: if the formal and conceptual contours of the political elite are approximately the same, but at the same time historical and modern state formations empirically demonstrate the different «power» and «weight» of the elite group, then what is the relevant typology of political elites, which allows predicting the priorities of its development in the future? The author has analyzed five existing classifications of political elites and proposed his own classification. As a result of the research, a new approach to the typology of elites was proposed. In particular, the identification of organizational, communicative, strategic and integration elites in the modern state is justified. This classification describes the functional-role content of elite groups and makes it possible to make an assumption about the development trends of political elites in modern society. The article concludes that the political elite is a society of people who have superiority over the others, and therefore are the most authoritative and competent in matters of state governance. The political elite consists of people who are actively involved in politics and have distinctive features: the right to nominate political leaders from their circles; special privileges; a certain degree of closeness to the elite members of other social strata; thinking based on the psychology of superiority over others; unique ideology; access to confidential state information.

About the Author

M. A. Amurov
Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Assistant Member of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Artamoshin S. V. Carl Schmitt // History issues [Voprosy istorii]. 2014. № 2. P. 100–115. (In rus)

2. Gaman-Golutvina O. V. Political elite as an object a research in domestic political science // Political science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2016. № 2. P. 38–73. (In rus)

3. Gumilev L. N. Ethnogenesis and Earth biosphere. SPb.: Crystal, 2001. (In rus)

4. Machiavelli N. Sovereign. M.: Art Literature, 1982. (In rus)

5. Shamakhov V. A., Balashov A. I. New social and political normality and lessons of modernization of the post-Soviet management system // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2016. № 12 (96). P. 6–15. (In rus)

6. Schmitt С. Person and Society in Disaster: The Impact of War, Revolution, Famine, Epidemics on Human Intelligence and Behavior, Social Organization and Cultural Life. SPb.: Publishing House “World,” 2012. (In rus)

7. Abbink J., Salverda T. (eds.). The Anthropology of Elites: Power, Culture and the Complexity of Distinction. Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

8. Aguiar L. L. M., Schneider C. J. Researching amongst Elites: Challenges and Opportunities in Studying Up. New York : Routledge, 2012.

9. Back H., Magnier A., Heinelt H. (eds.). The European Mayor. Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 2006.

10. Bader J. China, Autocratic Patron? An Empirical Investigation of China as a Factor in Autocratic Survival. International Studies Quarterly. 2015. N 59 (1). P. 23–33.

11. Best H. Associated Rivals: Antagonism and Cooperation in the German Political Elite. In H. Best, J. Higley (eds.). Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Brill : Leiden, 2010. P. 97–116.

12. Delican M. Elite theories of Pareto, Mosca and Michels. Sosyal Siyaset Konferanslari Dergisi. 2000. N 43. 323–336.

13. Domhoff G. W. Who Rules America? (6th ed.). New York : McGraw Hill, 2010.

14. Gill G. The Dynamics of Democratization. Elites, Civil Society and The Transition Process. New York : St. Martins Press, 2000.

15. Hafner-Burton E. M., Hughes D. A., Victor D. G. The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics, 2013. N 11 (2). P. 368–386.

16. Higley J., Burton M. Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.

17. Hoffmann-Lange U. Studying Elite Versus Mass Opinion // W. Donsbach, M. W. Traugott (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2008. P. 53–63.

18. Joo J.-H. A Typology of Political Elites and Its Transformation in China: From “Ideology-Oriented/ Replacement” Elites to “Fragmented/Reproductive” Elites. Asian Perspective, 2013. N 37. P. 255–279.

19. Linz J. J., Stepan A. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Press, 1996.

20. Meisel J. H. (1965) Power Structure and Power Flow. In Meisel J. H. (Eds.) Pareto and Mosca (pp. 165–169). Englewood Cliffs, New York : Prentice-Hall.

21. Milner M. Jr. Elites. A General Model. Cambridge : Polity Press, 2015.

22. Mosca G. The Ruling Class. New York : McGraw Hill, 1939.

23. Pareto V. The Mind and Society. A Treatise on General Sociology. New York : Dower, 1935.

24. Robertson R. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, 1992.

25. Stoker G. Governance as a theory: five positions. International Social Science Journal, 1998. N 50 (1). P. 17−29.

26. Szücs S., Strömberg L. Local Elites, Political Capital and Democratic Development: Governing Leaders in Seven European Countries/ Wiesbaden, Germany : VS Verlag für Socialwissenschaften, 2006.


Review

For citations:


Amurov M.A. The Classification of Contemporary Political Elites. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(5):19-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-5-19-28

Views: 1785


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)