Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis

The article provides a comparative study of Afghanistan’s investment agreements. The aim was to determine Russia’s potential as a state supporting investments in Afghanistan’s economy. The analysis of investors was done on the basis of the Investment Map of the International Trade Center. Data on investment flows are available from the statistical annex to the UNCTAD’s World Investment Report. The structure of Afghanistan’s investment treaties was presented on the UNCTAD website, on the International Investment Agreements Navigator page. Investment agreements of Afghanistan were analyzed according to the following plan: concessions within GATS, regional agreements, agreements with the countries of the West. GATS commitments provide sufficient space for investment in most areas other than the financial sector. The sphere of transport and construction, most developed by foreign investors, is opened to investment. Regional agreements with geographically and culturally close countries include the Agreement on Promotion and Protection of Investment among Member States of the Economic Cooperation Organization and the Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments Among Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. They have greater sectoral openness. Investors are offered a range of benefits beyond the commonly used tax incentives. The threats posed by political instability are specifically addressed. Expropriation of investments is complicated by a general ban and the right to challenge it in the court. These provisions create a more favourable climate for investment in Afghanistan by other Islamic states. The treaty between Germany and Afghanistan reflects Germany’s desire to clarify bilateral investment relations, in particular, it lists examples of «less favourable» treatment. Under the Afghanistan-US agreement, it can be judged that the US probably does not expect the Afghan government to protect unilaterally their investments. For this purpose, a special body has been formed with the participation of the US Trade Representative. Another feature of this treaty is the US position expressed in it in the field of protection of workers’ rights. Russia appears to have sufficient GATS commitments and guarantees under the Afghan Private Investment Act to protect its projects. The next phase of cooperation could be an agreement on the promotion and mutual protection of investment, as a model of which the Afghanistan-Germany agreement could be taken. The construction projects in which Russia is most interested are not always interpreted as investments. This depends on whether the construction company’s representation is “permanent” in the host country. One more agreement — to avoid double taxation — could be questioned. However, Afghanistan does not have such agreements with any country.

investments, investment agreements, Afghanistan, protection of investments, investment policy

1. Abdul K. M. L. The place and role of Afghanistan in contemporary international economic relations. In the collection: European Research. Collection of articles by the winners of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2017. P. 145–148. (In rus)

2. Asef N. Return of Russia to Afghanistan: Prospects of Bilateral Economic Cooperation // Bulletin of the Russian University of Friendship of Peoples. Series: International relations [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya]. 2017. V. 17. N 4. P. 781–792. (In rus)

3. Gul M. K. Prospects for Afghanistan’s Economy through International Cooperation // Economics and Governance in the 21st Century: Development Trends [Ekonomika i upravlenie v XXI veke: tendentsii razvitiya]. 2014. N 15. P. 16–21. (In rus)

4. Mendkovich N. A. Policy of Russia in Afghanistan in 2001–2011 [Electronic resource] // Historical Perspective Fund. 2012 URL: http://www.perspektivy.info/oykumena/azia/politika_rossii_v_ afganistane_v_20012011_gg_2012-02-17.htm (accessed: 20.02.2020). (In rus)

5. Haneev M. V. Political instability in Afghanistan: war of ideas or clan struggle? // Asia and Africa today [Aziya i Afrika segodnya]. 2008. N 11. P. 51–56. (In rus)

6. 2018 Investment Climate Statements: Afghanistan. US Department of State [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.state.gov/reports/2018-investment-climate-statements/afghanistan/ (accessed: 20.02.2020).

7. Blank S., Cordesman A., Inderfurth K., Safranchuk I., Huasheng Zh., Kuchins A. International Perspectives on Afghanistan and Regional Security to 2014 and Beyond. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Russia and Eurasia Program. July 26, 2011 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.csis.org/events/international-perspectives-afghanistan-and-regional-security2014-and-beyond (accessed: 20.02.2020).

8. Greenfield V., Crane K., Bond C., Chandler N., Luoto J., Oliker O. Reducing the Cultivation of Opium Poppies in Southern Afghanistan. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2015 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1075.html (accessed: 20.02.2020).

9. Huasheng Zh. China and Afghanistan. China’s interests, stances, and perspectives. Report of Center for Strategic and International Studies. March 2012 [Electronic resource]. URL: https:// csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/120322_Zhao_ ChinaAfghan_web.pdf (accessed: 20.02.2020).

10. Rahimi F. A. F. The impact of international forces withdrawal on investment in Herat, Afghanistan // Journal of International Studies. 2016. Vol. 9. N 1. P. 44–55.

11. Siddiqui A., Butt K. Afghanistan-Soviet Relations during the Cold War: A Threat for South Asian Peace // A Research Journal of South Asian Studies. 2014. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 617–631.

12. Starr S. F., Kuchins A. C. The Key to Success in Afghanistan — a Modern Silk Road Strategy // Silk Road Paper. Washington: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, 2010 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.silkroadstudies.org/publications/silkroad-papersand-monographs/item/13098-the-key-to-success-in-afghanistan-a-modern-silk-road-strategy. html (accessed: 20.02.2020).

13. World Investment report 2019: Special economic zones. UNCTAD [Electronic resource]. URL: https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=2460 (accessed: 20.02.2020).