Administrative Potential of the Personnel: Methodology of Assessment and Application
Abstract
Modern socio-economic and socio-cultural conditions predicts changesof characteristics of the professional activity, including - managerial activity. It acquires a new features, differs significantly from its own classical forms. The paper characterizes a non-classical of managerial activities that necessitate revision of the concepts of managerialcapacity of human resources. Author offers to consider the typology of the managerial capacity of the paper characterizes a non-classical of managerial activities that necessitate revision of the concepts of organizational staff managerial capacity as the methodological basis of appropriate technologies of personnel management.
About the Author
Elena Igorevna Kudriavtseva
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Dolzhenko R. A. Involvement of participants of crowdsourcing projects [Vovlechennost’ uchastnikov kraudsorsingovykh proektov] // Bulletin of Omsk University. Economy series [Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika»]. 2014. N 3. P. 29–37. (rus)
2. Zhuravlev A. L., Nestik T. A. Psycology of management of joint activity: New directions of researches [Psikhologiya upravleniya sovmestnoi deyatel’nost’yu: Novye napravleniya issledovanii]. M.: Publishing house “Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences” [Izdvo «Institut psikhologii RAN»], 2010. 248 p. (rus)
3. Ekaterinoslavsky Yu. Yu. Education of a reserve of key managers for the Russian companies: old problems and new decisions [Podgotovka rezerva klyuchevykh menedzherov dlya rossiiskikh kompanii: starye problemy i novye resheniya] // Management of the personnel development [Upravlenie razvitiem personala]. 2005. N 1. P. 50–54. (rus)
4. Kondratyev E. V. System and institutional development of the administrative personnel of the enterprise: theory and efficiency [Sistemno-institutsional’noe razvitie upravlencheskogo personala predpriyatiya: teoriya i effektivnost’]. Penza: PGUAS, 2012. 316 p. (rus)
5. Kudryavtseva E.I. Competences and management: competences of management, competence of managers, management of competences [Kompetentsii i menedzhment: kompetentsii v menedzhmente, kompetentsii menedzherov, menedzhment kompetentsii]. SPb.: RANEPA SZIU [SZIU RANKhiGS], 2012. 340 p. (rus)
6. Kupriyanov E. A. Is it worth doing: validity of the Appraisal centers [Stoit li igra svech: validnost’ Tsentrov otsenki] // Organizational psychology [Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya]. 2011. Vol. 1, N 1. P. 50–58. (rus)
7. Loginova Yu. Labor market of administrative personnel — post-crisis transformations [Rynok truda upravlencheskikh kadrov — postkrizisnye transformatsii] // Reference book on human resource management [Spravochnik po upravleniyu personalom]. 2011. N 3. P. 98–100. (rus)
8. Haymovich I. N., Kuzmina N. M. Methodology of system approach to the analysis of processes of formation and development of personnel capacity of the organization [Metodologiya sistemnogo podkhoda k analizu protsessov formirovaniya i razvitiya kadrovogo potentsiala organizatsii] // News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk]. 2013. Vol. 15. N 6 (2). P. 525–527. (rus)
9. Hermelin E., Lievens F., Robertson I. Assessment Center Validity for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: a meta-analysis [Prognosticheskaya validnost’ Tsentra otsenki: meta-analiz] / Тranslation from English E. Lurie, V. Tikhomirov // Organizational psychology [Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya]. 2011. Vol. 1. N 1. P. 39–49. (rus)
10. Hodgkinson G.Ph., Sparrow P.R. The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process (Managing Work and Organizations). Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2002. 432 р.
11. Huselid M. A., Becker B. E. Bridging Micro and Macro Domains: Workforce Differentiation and Strategic Human Resource Management // Journal of Management. 2011. Vol. 37, N 2, Р. 421– 428.
12. Invisible management: The social construction of leadership // Eds. by E. Sjostrand, J. Santberg, M. Tyrstrup. London: Cengage, 2002. 280 р.
13. Johns G. The nature of work, the context of organizational behavior, and the application of industrial organizational psychology // Canadian Psychology. 1998. N 39. Р. 149–157.
14. Kahai S.S., Avolio B. J. Effects of leadership style and anonymity on the discussion of an ethical issue in an electronic meeting system context // S. Weisband (Ed.) Leadership at a distance: Research in technologically supported work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008. Р. 513–538.
15. Kocolowski M. D. Shared Leadership: Is it Time for a Change? // Emerging Leadership Journeys. 2010. Vol. 3, Iss. 1. Р. 22–32.
16. Matthews J. Assessing Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Performance Measures // The Library Quarterly. 2011. N 81. Р. 83–110.
17. OECD Reviews of Human Resource Management in Government. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2009. 192 р.
18. Osterman P. Recognizing the value of middle management // Global Business. 2009. N 73 (6). Р. 31–38.
19. Ramthun A. J. Shared Leadership in Dangerous Environments: Testing a Model for Military Teams Using Mixed Methods Research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2013. 155 р.
20. Rockar H. M., Kohun F. G. Highs and Lows of Organizational Decision Making and the Relationship to Collaboration and Technology Tools // Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology. 2011. Vol. 8. Р. 175–208.
21. Rouleau L., Balogun J. Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence // Journal of Management Studies. 2011. N 48 (5). Р. 953–983.
22. Shi W., Markoczy L., Dess G. The role of middle management in the strategy process: group affiliation, structural holes and tertiuslungens // Journal of management. 2009. Vol. 35, Iss. 6. Р. 1453–1480.
23. Ulrich D., Smallwood N., Sweetman K. The Leadership Code: Five Rules to Lead by. N. Y.: Harvard Business Review Press, 2008. 208 р.
Review
For citations:
Kudriavtseva E.I. Administrative Potential of the Personnel: Methodology of Assessment and Application. Administrative Consulting. 2015;(8):66-75. (In Russ.)
Views:
388
Email this article 