Globalization 3.0 or New Regionalization: Towards the Phasing of World Development
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-3-10-15
Abstract
The scientific approach implies the desire to periodize any phenomenon of public life. In this context, globalization is not a unique object. Globalization as a process and a set of characteristics of development can be traced back to the formation of a single market in the late XIX — early XX cen- turies, and until now they cannot be considered in one array. It is obvious that more work may be devoted to this issue. The presented article attempts to show the significant characteristics of the generally recognized model of globalization of the late XX — early XXI centuries, already traditionally called “globalization 2.0.”
An attempt was made to show the period of globalization 2.0 as relatively short-lived. Accordingly, the question was raised as to which globalization (or not globalization, but new regionalization) would dominate by the further development of existing processes, that is, globalization 3.0.
About the Authors
V. A. Shamakhov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Shamakhov, Director, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor
Saint-Petersburg
N. M. Mezhevich
Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Chief Researcher, Doctor of Science (Economics)
Moscow
References
1. Abalkin L. I. Change of millennia and social alternatives // Economic issues [Voprosy ekonomiki]. 2000. N 12. P. 27−40. (In Rus).
2. Diesen G. All-Eurasia House and Conservative Political Economy Russia [Electronic Resource] // Russia in Global Politics [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. 2021. N 3. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/ articles/obshheevrazijskij-dom-politekonom/ (In Rus).
3. Kizima S. A., Bakin A. I. System aspects of the organization and functioning of the European Union // European Union: history, policy, economy, law: international academic and research conference (on December 17−18, 1997, Minsk). Collection of scientific articles. Belstateuniversity, 1998. (In Rus).
4. Mezhevich N. M., Zverev Yu. M. Economic security dilemmas in the eastern part of the Baltic Sea // Baltic region [Baltiiskii region]. 2018. V. 10, N 1. P. 73−88. (In Rus).
5. Mezhevich N. M., Kuznetsov S. V. Some key characteristics of the world economy as conditions for the development of the national economy of Russia // Economic revival of Russia [Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii]. 2018. N 1 (55). P. 33−41. (In Rus).
6. The fate of the State in the era of globalization: monograph. M. : Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2005. 200 p. (In Rus).
Review
For citations:
Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.M. Globalization 3.0 or New Regionalization: Towards the Phasing of World Development. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(3):10-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-3-10-15
Views:
718
Email this article 