Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Current Problems and Priorities of the Cultural Policy in Russia in the Context of the Neotraditionalist Ideology

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-4-27-35

Abstract

State cultural policy has great impact in determining the content of mass consciousness, setting the boundaries of the social norm. The priorities of cultural policy are determined by its ideological foundations, which have become the subject of the analysis of this article. The research is based on the principle of historicism, since the concept of culture is ambiguous in its content and historical in its essence. The study of culture as a social phenomenon and a factor of social management correlate with the problem of state ideology formation, its indoctrination into the public consciousness and its implementation in practical forms. The materials of the study were the substantive provisions of the documents of strategic planning in the field of state cultural policy, understood from the standpoint of the theory of culture. Based on the analysis of the culture functions in society, the article characterizes the innovative potential of culture, which determines the transformation the way of life in the political, social, economic and technological spheres. The development of society, and with it cultural norms, has passed the stages of archaic and modern, entering the postmodern era. The evolution of socio-economic relations and cultural norms creates contradictions between tradition and modernization. The value-semantic foundations of the society development are caught between the Scylla of archaization and the Charybdis of anomie. The authors project this conflict on the semantic foundations of the state cultural policy in modern Russia, revealing the dialectic of continuity and innovation in the development of national culture. The author concludes that the strategy of reproduction of cultural norms dominates as a priority of the state culture policy. In this approach, the authors see risks for the effective performance of the culture of its functions in the postmodern era.

About the Authors

S. V. Bukalova
Central Russian Institute of Management — Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy оf National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Bukalova Associate Professor, PhD in History

Orel



K. G. Merkulova
Central Russian Institute of Management — Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy оf National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Kseniya G. Merkulova Associate Professor, PhD in Political Sciences

Orel



References

1. Auzan A. A. National values and modernization. M. : OGI, 2010. (In Rus)

2. Bachinin V. A. Political theology of postmodern Wars // Neva [Neva]. 2015. N 7. P. 214–222. (In Rus)

3. Volkov V. N. Postmodern and its main characteristics // Cultural heritage of Russia [Kul’turnoe nasledie Rossii]. 2014. N 2. P. 3–8. (In Rus)

4. Kroeber A. L. Izbrannoe: Priroda kultury. M. : ROSSPEN, 2004. (In Rus)

5. Lamzhaa Ch. K. Archaizatsiya, traditionalizm i neotraditionalizm // Knowlege. Understanding. Skill [Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie]. 2010. N 2. P. 88–93. (In Rus)

6. Litvintseva G.Yu. Russian “national meta-narratives” in the postmodern era // Universum: Social Sciences: Electron Scientific journal [Universum: Obshchestvennye nauki: elektronyj nauchnyj zhurnal]. 2017. N 2 (32) [Electronic resource]. URL: http://7universum.com/ru/social/archive/ item/4382 (accessed: 31.03.2021). (In Rus)

7. Mezhuyev V. M. The idea of culture. Essays on the philosophy of culture. M. : Progress-Tradition, 2006. (In Rus)

8. Mol A. Sociodynamika kultury. Ed. 3d. M. : LKI Publishing House, 2008. (In Rus)

9. Neotraditionalism: archaic syndrome and the construction of a new sociality in the context of globalization processes / Responsible editors V. V. Bocharov, V. A. Popov. SPb. : Center for Informatization of Education “KIO”, 2019. (In Rus)

10. Polonskaya I. N. Tradition: from sacred foundations to modernity. Rostov-on-Don : Publishing House of the Rostov University, 2006. (In Rus)

11. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: political and economic origins of our time. SPb. : Aleteya, 2002. (In Rus)

12. Polivaeva N. P., Berenov A. R., Shumarov A. P. Dominants of spiritual and moral values of cadets of departmental higher education (experience of empirical research) // Central Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences [Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk]. 2021. N 1. Vol. 16. P. 57–72. (In Rus)

13. Resnyansky S. I. The origins of the formation of the spiritual and moral space of the individual // Bulletin of State and Municipal Administration [Vestnik gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya]. 2019. N 1. Vol. 8. P. 14–20. (In Rus)

14. Traditions and innovations in modern Russia: a sociological analysis of interaction and dynamics : monograph / ed. A. B. Hoffman. M. : ROSSPEN, 2008. (In Rus)

15. Babadzan A. Culturalism, Neo-liberalism and the State: The Rise and Fall of Neotraditionalist Ideologies in the South Pacific // Rata E., Openshaw R. Public Policy and Ethnicity — the politics of Ethnic Boundary Making. NY : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Р. 43–65.

16. David-Fox М. Multiple Modernities vs. Neo-Traditionalism: On Recent Debates in Russian and Soviet History // Yearbooks for the History of Eastern Europe [Jahrbücher Für Geschichte Osteuropas]. 2006. Vol. 54. N 4. Р. 535–555.

17. Friedman J. Cultural identity and global process. London : Sage Publications Ldt, 1994.

18. Kroeber A. L., Kluckhohn C. Culture: a Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge : Papers of the Peabody museum of American archeology and ethnology, Harvard University, 1952.

19. Yakovlev A., Antonov I., Fedorov S. (Neo)traditionalism as a form of cultural identity of the inhabitants of Yakutsk // International Conference on Sustainable Development of Cross-Border Regions: Economic, Social and Security Challenges (ICSDCBR 2019). Dordrecht : Atlantis Press, 2019. Р. 809–813.


Review

For citations:


Bukalova S.V., Merkulova K.G. Current Problems and Priorities of the Cultural Policy in Russia in the Context of the Neotraditionalist Ideology. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(4):27-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-4-27-35

Views: 468


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)