Human Rights: From Theory to Politics

The article addresses human rights from the perspectives of defining their conceptual foundations, considering them as an element of geopolitics and a context-oriented approach to ensuring them. The recognition of the dignity of the human person — the main thing, on what is based the concept of human rights. The idea of human dignity manifests itself in the equal status of each person and is expressed in the fact that at birth each person becomes a member of the corporate body of humanity. From this point of view, any attempt to deprive a person of his “innate” corporate identity as a member of humanity is precisely what constitutes a violation of human rights. At the same time, practice should be separated from rhetoric. At the level of political practice, the history of human rights, as in the time of Locke, retains all the signs of social inequality, remains the history of drawing the boundaries of the rights of some social groups, strata and peoples at the expense of limiting others. Identifying the essence of human rights with Western culture denies the possibility for other cultures to have the same rights. Affirming that those who are not part of Western culture are excluded from the human rights radar. Accordingly, the most productive approach in the theory and practice of ensuring human rights is the context-oriented approach, which involves representatives of different cultures in the dialogue, who do not necessarily share the same understanding of human rights ethics, acting as a context-dependent universality.

1. Aristotle. Nikomakhova ethics. M. : EKSMO-Press, 1997. (In rus).

2. Ivanov N., Cherkasov P., Iserov A. Founding fathers. The birth of the USA. SPb. : AST-Press Kniga, 2013. (In rus).

3. Camus A. The rebellious man. Philosophy. Politics. Art. M. : Politizdat, 1990. (In rus).

4. Kugay A. I. Violence: the philosophical position of vision // Power [Vlast’]. 2013. Vol. 21. N 2. P. 145–148. (In rus).

5. Kugay A. I. Russia in the conditions of the dictatorship of Western geopolitical projects // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2015. N 4 (76). P. 8–13. (In rus).

6. Kugay A. I., Mikhailova V. V. “Digital generation”: threats and hopes in the era of information and digital civilization // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. N 7 (127). P. 90–99. (In rus).

7. Crouch C. Postdemocracy. M. : Publishing House of the State University — Higher School of Economics, 2010. (In rus).

8. Lefort K. Political essays (XIX–XX centuries). M. : ROSSPAN, 2000. (In rus).

9. Locke J. Works in three volumes: Vol. 3. M. : Mysl, 1988. P. 91–134. (In rus).

10. Ryklin M. Apocalypse now. Philosophy after September 11 // Logos. 2002. N 3. (4). P. 111–119. (In rus).

11. Tilly Ch. Struggle and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000 / ed. V. V. Anashvili. Moscow: Publishing house of the higher school of Economics, 2010. (In rus).

12. Andorno R. Human Dignity and Human Rights as a Common Ground for a Global Bioethics // Journal of Medecine and Philosophy. 2009. N 34 (3). P. 223–240.

13. Arendt H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York : Harcourt, Brace & Compan, 1973.

14. Barnett M., Weiss Th. (eds.). Humanitarianism in question: politics, power, ethics. Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2008.

15. Deng F. M. Reconciling Sovereignty with Responsibility: A Basis for International Humanitarian Action // Africa in World Politics: Post-Cold War Challenges. Boulder, Colo. : Westview, 1995.

16. Donnelly J. Universal human rights in theory and in practice. 2nd ed. Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2003.

17. Habermas J. The Post-National Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts : MIT Press, 2001

18. Ignatieff M. The Lesser Evil. Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Princeton (NJ) ; Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2004.

19. Ingram D. World Crisis and Backwardness: a Critical Theory of Poverty, Agency, and Coercion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2018.

20. Joas H. The Sacredness of the Person: A New Genealogy of Human Rights. Washington, D. C. : Georgetown University Press, 2013.

21. Moka-Mubelo V. Reconciling Law and Morality in human rights discourse: Beyond the Habermasian description of human rights. Cham, Switzerland : Springer Publishing, 2017.

22. Mutua M. Human rights: Political and cultural criticism. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002.

23. Moyn Sl. Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.

24. Pape R. A. When Duty Calls: A Pragmatic Standard of Humanitarian Intervention // International Security. 2012. N 37 (1). P. 41–80.

25. Rivero O. de. The Myth of Development. The Non-Viable Economies of the 21st Century. L.; N. Y. : Zed Books, 2001.

26. Reno W. Sierra Leone: Warfare in a Post-State Society // Rotberg R. (ed.) State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror. Washington (DC) : Brookings Institution Press, 2003.

27. Rosen M. Dignity: its history and significance. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 2012.

28. Taylor C. Conditions for a forced consensus on human rights // The Politics of Human Rights / edited by O. Savich. London : Verso, 1999.