Problems of Contemporary Public Administration: Content Analysis of Scientific Publications

The purpose of this article is to characterize the current trends in public administration research in European countries. Methodologically, the article is based on the content analysis of the leading journals in the field of research of the theory and practice of public administration in European countries. The journals, which form the basis for the analysis of the subject area of the European science of public administration, are a theoretical and methodological platform in the field of public administration, which serves as a unifying framework for scientists and practitioners interested in the public sector and public sector management. Analysis of current trends and research provides a factual basis for decision-making, presents an accessible format, and encourages discussion. Journals on public administration in European countries are an institutional whole, not the least role in the stable significance of which is played by the «hypothesis — method» bundle, which does not allow writing and further publishing articles of a proveless nature. A total of 410 articles from six top journals (1–39 place (Q1) Scimago Journal & Country Rank) for 2017–2020 were analyzed. The analysis of articles shows that most of the journals are aimed at publishing articles of an analytical, methodological, and theoretical nature on five main topics: theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of public policy and public administration; national public political events and processes; the European Union as an actor in regional and international affairs; institutions, politics, and political processes in the European Union and other countries of the world; state policy of interaction between the European Union and other states, as well as comparative studies related to multidimensional issues of public administration. The practical result of the article is the formation of a pool of hypotheses for the study of public administration in conjunction with specific methods that allow these hypotheses to be tested. The reviewed articles reflect a steady interest among scientists and practitioners in understanding projects, the effectiveness of public policy instruments, and the organizational level factors that make it possible to implement them. They reveal how public policy embodies broader trends in society in terms of new regulatory approaches, initiatives, and mechanisms.

1. Atamanchuk G. V. Problems of analysis of public administration // Public and private law [Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo]. 2008. N 1. P. 92–102. (In rus)

2. Balashov A. I., Barkova T. N., Vasilyeva E. A., Tulupieva T. V., Yantzen A. V. Preparation, writing and presentation of the final qualification work in the field of preparation “State and municipal management.” St. Petersburg: Konovalova Publishing House A. M., 2020. (In rus)

3. Barabashev A. G. Features of the preparation of the text of a research article in the field of state and municipal management // Issues of state and municipal management [Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya]. 2016. N 1. P. 172–187. (In rus)

4. Barabashev A. G., Utkina V. V. State Administration in Russia: the main subject areas and trends of scientific research // University Bulletin (State University of Management) [Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya)]. 2014. N 16. P. 5–15. (In rus)

5. Glushakova O. V., Weisber Y. A. On the essence, content and relationship of the concepts of “public administration,” “social management,” “public administration” // Economics. Management. Innovation [Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Innovatsi]. 2013. N 3. P. 3–9. (In rus)

6. Demina N. V. The concept of the ethos of science: Merton and others in search of the social geometry of norms // Sociological journal [Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal]. 2005. N 4. P. 5–47. (In rus)

7. Pyatkina L. O., Zakharov A. A., Trufanova V. V., Barabashev A. G. Improvement of public administration in Russia/ex. ed.: A. G. Barabashev; scientific. ed.: A. G. Barabashev. Iss. 12: Human resources practices in public administration. M.: New chronograph, 2018. (In rus)

8. Shamakhov V. A., Balashov A. I. Resource saving strategy: development vs distribution (Russian agenda) // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2016. N 6 (90). P. 7–13.

9. Uzdyaeva U. D. Conviction as a method of public administration // Alley of Science [Alleya nauki]. 2017. N 4 (15). P. 618–622. (In rus)

10. Utkina V V., Barabashev A. G. On the difference between the analytics of public administration and public administration as a scientific direction // State administration. Electronic bulletin [Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik]. 2014. N 47. P. 19–38. (In rus)

11. Alford J., O’Flynn J. Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings // International Journal of Public Administration. 2009. N 32 (3–4). P. 171–191.

12. Alvesson M., Sandberg J. Generating research questions through problematization // Academy of Management Review. 2011. Vol. 36. P. 247–271.

13. Bardach E., Patashnik E. M. A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving (5th Edition). CQ Press, Los Angeles, 2016.

14. Chervyakova O. V. The fundamental basis of the «public administration» formation as a scientific field in Ukraine // Public manаgement. 2017. N 4. P. 218–225.

15. Corley E. A., Sabharwal M. Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: analysing recent trends // Public Administration. 2010. N 88 (3). P. 627–648.

16. Davis R. S., Stazyk E. C. Putting the Methodological Cart before the Theoretical Horse? Examining the Application of SEM to Connect Theory and Method in Public Administration Research // Review of Public Personnel Administration. 2017. N 37 (2). P. 202–218.

17. Dekker R., Franco Contreras J., Meijer A. The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: A Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences // International Journal of Public Administration. 2020. Vol. 43, Is. 14. P. 1207–1217.

18. Denhardt R. B. The Big Questions of Public Administration Education // Public Administration Review. 2001. N 61 (5). P. 526–534.

19. Eller W. S., Gerber B. J., Robinson S. E. (2018). Public Administration Research Methods: Tools for Evaluation and Evidence-Based Practice. New York : Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315163727.

20. Frederickson G. H. A New Era for the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2013. Vol. 13, Iss. 1. P. 1–2.

21. Hergüner B. Preparing Future Public Administrators: A Study on the Factors Affecting Cultural Competence of Public Administration Students. Evaluation and Program Planning. Available online 30 January 2021, 101914. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021. P. 101914.

22. Katz J. S., Martin B. R. What is research collaboration? // Research Policy 1997. N 26. P. 1–18.

23. Kerlinová A., Tomášková E. Approach to Strategy at Public Administration Organizations in the Czech Republiс // Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 156 (26). P. 88–92.

24. Ketchen D. J., Boyd B. K., Bergh D. D. Research methodology in strategic management: past accomplishments and future challenges // Organizational Research Methods. 2008. N 11 (4). P. 643–658.

25. McCurdy H. E., Cleary R. E. Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration? // Public Administration Review. 1984. N 44 (1). P. 49–55.

26. Moynihan D. A great schism approaching? Towards a micro and macro public administration // Journal of Behavioral Public Administration. 2018. P. 1–8.

27. Strei G., Slotkin B. J., Rivera M. Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective // Public Administration Review. 2001. Vol. 61. N 5. P. 515–525.