Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Export Support by Regions: Experience of the Republic of Tatarstan

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-6-17-31

Abstract

The article presents an argument for participation of federative units in the formation of the territories’ export potential and determines the main directions of organizing support for exporters on regional level.

Article studies the variety of approaches described in the scientific literature to the forming of infrastructure for export development, implementation and ensuring the effectiveness of measures to support exporters, building up export potential, assimilation of modern technologies for sales organization. The export promotion activities of the Republic of Tatarstan are classified according to the main trends identified in the work. There are described practices of the Republic of Tatarstan on the formation and implementation of export potential, which are of interest for study and implementation by other constituent entities of the Russian Federations.

Topical areas of further work include the implementation of a program-targeted approach for supporting the export of small and medium-sized businesses, improving the forms of online sailing and promoting goods, enhancing interaction with trade missions of the Russian Federation and foreign missions of the Russian Export Center.

About the Author

R. R. Gimatdinov
Representative office of JSC Russian Export Center
Turkey

Radik R. Gimatdinov - Head of the Representative Office of JSC Russian Export Center in the Republic of Turkey.

Istanbul



References

1. Belyakova G. Ya., Fokina D. A. Instruments of state support for the development of the export potential of machine-building enterprises // Fundamental research [Fundamental’nye issledovaniya]. 2014. N 11. P. 1997–2003. (In rus)

2. Bludova S. N. Analysis of world experience in stimulating and promoting the development of foreign economic activity // Russian foreign economic bulletin [Rossijskij vneshneekonomicheskij vestnik]. 2007. N 5. P. 38–45. (In rus)

3. Gimatdinov R. R., Nasyrov IR Institute of foreign representations of the Republic of Tatarstan // International life [Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn›]. 2015. N 3. P. 136–149. (In rus)

4. Gimatdinov R. R., Nasyrov I. R. Group of strategic vision “Russia — the Islamic world» as an instrument of «soft power» in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation // Vostok. Afro-Asian Societies: Past and Present [Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost›]. 2019. N 1. P. 180–195. (In rus)

5. Kozlov L. E., Ivanov A. A., Tkachuk Yu. O., Savchenko A. V., Didik E. A., Stepanova A. V. State support for exports in Russia under sanctions // International Journal of Applied and Fundamental research [Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental’nyh issledovanij]. 2015. N 8. P. 545–547. (In rus)

6. Ogryzov A. A. US Experience in Export Support and Export Lending // Economic Sciences [Ekonomicheskie nauki]. 2015. N 11 (132). P. 121–125. (In rus)

7. Rodygina N.Yu., Moleva S. V., Musikhin V. I., Alekseev V. I. Export support tools abroad and the possibilities of their use in Russia // Russian foreign economic bulletin [Rossijskij vneshneekonomicheskij vestnik]. 2019. N 11. P. 15–27. (In rus)

8. Simonova L. M., Dorokhova A. O. The influence of state support on the development of non-resource exports in the Russian Federation // Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Socio-economic and legal research [Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social’no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya]. 2019. Vol. 5. N 4 (20). P. 169–187. (In rus)

9. Spartak A. N. Possibilities of Russian export expansion and its state support // Russian foreign economic bulletin [Rossijskij vneshneekonomicheskij vestnik]. 2017. N 5. P. 3–18. (In rus)

10. Urumov T. R. The effectiveness of state financial support for export activities of small and medium-sized enterprises // Actual problems of economics and law [Aktual’nye problem ekonomiki i prava]. 2017. Vol. 11. N 1. P. 67–78. (In rus)

11. Arize A. C., Malindretos J., Igwe E. U. Do Exchange Rate Changes Improve the Trade Balance: An Asymmetric Nonlinear Cointegration Approach // International Review of Economics Finance. 2017. N 49. P. 313–326.

12. Ayob A. H., Freixanet J. Insights into public export promotion programs in an emerging economy: the case of Malaysian SMEs // Evaluation and Program Planning. 2014. Vol. 46. October 2014. P. 38–46.

13. Bilgin C. Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Exports: A Sectoral Nonlinear Cointegration Analysis for Turkey // Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development. 2020. Vol. 41. N 1. Р. 1–30.

14. Bojnec Š., Fertő I. The duration of global agri-food export competitiveness // British Food Journal. 2017. Vol. 119. Is. 6. P. 1378–1393.

15. Dimitrova B. V., Korschun D., Yotov Y. V. When and how country reputation stimulates export volume // International Marketing Review. 2017. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 377–402.

16. Karpov V. V., Khairov B. G., Miller M. A., Miller E. V. Development of a method for assessing the compliance of state export support measures with the requirements of the OECD Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits // Espacios. 2019. Vol. 40. N 13. P. 28–35.

17. Lages L. F., Montgomery D. B. The relationship between export assistance and performance improvement in Portuguese export ventures: an empirical test of the mediating role of pricing strategy adaptation // European Journal of Marketing. 2005. Vol. 39. Is. 7/8. P. 755–784.

18. Mills T., Dukeov I., Fey C. F. Russian competitiveness in the global economy // Journal of East — West Business. 2007. Vol. 13. N 4. P. 97–138.

19. Pradana М. The usefulness of online platform to increase small medium enterprise (SME)’s performance (case study: Qlapa Indonesia) // Economic strategizing in new realities: mechanisms, tools, technologies / general ed. prof. L. G. Matveeva, prof. O. A. Chernova. Taganrog : SFedU Pub. House. 2016. 463 p. P. 388–393.

20. Rojec M., Damijan J. P., Majcen B. Export Propensity of Estonian and Slovenian Manufacturing Firms: Does Foreign Ownership Matter? // Eastern European Economics. 2004. Vol. 42. N 4. P. 33–54.

21. Shamsuddoha A. K., Ali M. Y., Ndubisi N. O. Impact of government export assistance on internationalization of SMEs from developing nations // Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2009. Vol. 22. Is. 4. P. 408–422.

22. Sudarevic T., Radojevic P., Marjanovic D., Dragas R. Marketing and financial barriers in agrifood exporting. // British Food Journal. 2017. Vol. 119. Is. 3. P. 613–624.

23. Vinh N. T. T., Duong T. T. T. Firm export and the impact of foreign ownership in Vietnam: a microdata analysis // Journal of Economic Development. 2020. Vol. 45. N 1. P. 123–142.

24. Xiaoting W., Aihua C., Huafeng W., Shengxiao L. Effect of export promotion programs on export performance: evidence from manufacturing SMEs // Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2017. Vol. 18. N 1. P. 131–145.

25. Yongliang Z., Weihua R., Yonghong J., Junnan R. Salesperson human capital investment and heterogeneous export enterprises performance // Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2018. Vol. 19. Is. 4. P. 609–629.


Review

For citations:


Gimatdinov R.R. Export Support by Regions: Experience of the Republic of Tatarstan. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(6):17-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-6-17-31

Views: 371


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)