Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Human Corporality: Postmodernism in the Face of the Russian Philosophy

Abstract

In article views of the Russian thinkers, representatives of philosophy of unity, on the nature of a human corporality are analyzed. Unlike the classical Christian tradition opposing a body as a sin source, to spirit, the Russian philosophers prove the principle of spiritual-corporal unity, need of release of a body from the status of the exclusive carrier of sinfulness which is first of all a spirit illness. The analysis of views of the Russian thinkers showed that they see a body as some kind of substance of the inclinations and passions peculiar to the person, and don’t consider heterogeneity and internal discrepancy of a human corporality. These lines find the specific expression within concrete culture, according to a corporal canon peculiar to this culture. Views of the Russian thinkers are opposite to installations of a postmodernism according to which the body acts as the sphere of game existence and experiment, as some iconic design answering group, conventionally defined values. Follows from ideas of the Russian philosophers that the corporality represents the condition of completeness of human life, which is in deep communication with the sphere of spirit. The Russian philosophy focuses on creative search of those forms of development and spiritual filling of a corporality which would correspond to spirit of culture and the purposes of an eminence of the human person.

About the Author

Vladimir Borisovich Aleksandrov
North-West Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation


References

1. Bakhtin M. M. Francois Rabelais’s creativity and national culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance [Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura srednevekov’ya i Renessansa]. M : 1990. (rus)

2. Berdyaev N. A. Sense of creativity [Smysl tvorchestva] // Berdyaev N. A. Philosophy of freedom. Sense of creativity [Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva]. M. : 1989. (rus)

3. Zenkovsky V. V. Education problems in the light of Christian anthropology [Problemy vospitaniya v svete khristianskoi antropologii]. M/ : 1993. (rus)

4. Mamardashvili M.K., Solovyov E. Yu., Shvyrev V.S. Classical and modern bourgeois philosophy (experience of epistemological comparison). Article first. Article second [Klassicheskaya i sovremennaya burzhuaznaya filosofiya (opyt epistemologicheskogo sopostavleniya). Stat’ya pervaya. Stat’ya vtoraya] // Mamardashvili M. K. Classical and nonclassical rationality ideals [Klassicheskii i neklassicheskii idealy ratsional’nosti]. SPb. : 2010. (rus)

5. Solovyov V. S. Sense f love [Smysl lyubvi] // Solovyov V. S. Compositions in two volumes [Sochineniya v 2 tomakh]. V. 2. M. : 1990. (rus)

6. Solovyov V.S. Vital drama of Platon [Zhiznennaya drama Platona] // Solovyov V. S. Compositions in two volumes [Sochineniya v 2 tomakh]. V. 2. M. : 1990. (rus)

7. Frank S. L. God with Us [S nami Bog] // Franc S. L. Spiritual bases of society [Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva]. M. : 1992. (rus)

8. Erasmus of Rotterdam. Weapon of the Christian soldier [Oruzhie khristianskogo voina] // Erasmus of Rotterdam. Philosophical works [Filosofskie proizvedeniya]. M. : 1986. (rus)


Review

For citations:


Aleksandrov V.B. Human Corporality: Postmodernism in the Face of the Russian Philosophy. Administrative Consulting. 2015;(9):140-148. (In Russ.)

Views: 354


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)