Elections as an Institution of Trust: Features of Functioning in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-10-21
Abstract
The article is devoted to identifying the features of the functioning of elections as a democratic institution in a pandemic. Based on the constructivist approach and the method of comparative analysis, the author attempts to conceptualize elections as an institution of trust and to characterize the electoral practices used by European countries in the electoral process. Based on the research of D. Coleman, N. Luhmann, R. Putnam, P. Roseanvallon, P. Shtompka, I. Krastev, F. Fukuyama, D. Gambetto, the author, despite the ambiguity of the concept of “trust”, concludes that it is essential role in the relationship between government and society. Mistrust means the alienation of society from the social sphere, lack of faith in justice, a feeling of uncertainty and a threat emanating from government institutions. Trust creates a moral environment in society that promotes development and effective problem solving. In an atmosphere of trust, various voting options are possible, which are not disputed by citizens, and elections become the most important indicator of this trust. Pandemic restrictions have left a significant imprint on electoral practices; nevertheless, there is an obvious trend towards the active introduction of remote electronic voting, which has not yet reached perfection, but is a strategically priority in the ongoing election campaigns. At the same time, increased requirements are imposed on the safety of the electoral process, its normative regulation, openness and publicity.
About the Author
N. A. BaranovRussian Federation
Nikolay A. Baranov, Professor of the Chair of International Relations, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Alekseev R. A., Abramov A. V. Problems and prospects of using electronic voting and electoral blockchain technology in Russia and abroad // Citizen. Elections. Power [Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’]. 2020. N 1 (15). P. 9–21. (In Rus).
2. Besset J. M. Quiet voice of reason. Deliberative Democracy and the American System of Government. M. : Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), 2011. 336 p. (In Rus).
3. Borisov I. B., Golovin A. G., Ignatov A. V. Elections in the world: electronic voting / total. ed. I. B. Borisov. M. : Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law, 2020. 218 p. (In Rus).
4. Dahl R. Democracy and its critics. M. : ROSSPEN, 2003. 576 p. (In Rus)
5. Krastev I. Management of mistrust. M. : Publishing house “Europe”, 2014. 128 p. (In Rus).
6. Putnam R. For democracy to work. Civil Traditions in Modern Italy. M. : Ad Marginem, 1996. 287 p. (In Rus).
7. Post-image world: “We in Europe do not fully understand what we want” // Global Dialogue. Euronews. 04/26/2021 [Electronic source]. URL: https://ru.euronews.com/2021/04/26/ru-tgceffects-of-covid (accessed: 11.07.2021). (In Rus).
8. Rosanvallon P. Counter-democracy: politics in the era of mistrust // Emergency reserve [Neprikosnovennyy zapas]. 2012. N 4 [Electronic source]. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2012/4/kontrdemokratiya-politika-v-epohu-nedoveriya.html (accessed: 22.06.2021). (In Rus).
9. Sinyavskaya O. Born by the pandemic // Russia in global politics [Rossiya v global’noy politike]. 2020. N 5 [Electronic source]. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/rozhdyonnye-pandemiej/ (accessed: 11.07.2021). (In Rus).
10. Tulchinsky G. L., Lisenkova A. A. The problem of trust and modern information and communication technologies // Russian humanitarian journal [Rossiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal]. 2016. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 233–242. (In Rus).
11. Frank L. S. From reflections on the Russian revolution // New world [Novyy mir]. 1990. N 4. P. 207–226. (In Rus).
12. Fukuyama F. Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity / per. from English. M. : OOO “AST Publishing House”: ZAO NPP “Ermak”, 2004. 730 p. (In Rus).
13. Shtompka P. Sociology. Analysis of modern society. 2nd ed. M. : Logos, 2010. 664 p. (In Rus).
14. Arrow K. J. The Limits of Organization. New York : W. W. Norton, 1974. 86 p.
15. Coleman J. S. Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie. Bd. 1. München : Oldenburg, 1991. XVI. 474 s.
16. Heinmaa A. Special Voting Arrangements (SVAs) in Europe: In-Country Postal, Early, Mobile and Proxy Arrangements in Individual Countries. 19.10.2020 // International Institute for democracy and electoral assistance [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/special-voting-arrangements-svas-europe-country-postal-early-mobile-and-proxy (accessed: 10.07.2021).
17. Heinmaa A., Kalandadze N. Special Voting Arrangements in Europe: Postal, Early and Mobile Voting. Webinar series report, november 2020. Stockholm : International IDEA, 2021. 34 p.
18. James Toby S., Alihodzic Sead. When Is It Democratic to Postpone an Election? Elections During Natural Disasters, Covid-19, and Emergency Situations // Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 2020. Vol. 19. N 3. P. 344–362 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/elj.2020.0642 (accessed: 24.06.2021).
19. Luhmann N. Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. In: Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford : Basil Blacjwell, 2008. P. 94–107 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/users/gambetta/Trust_making%20and%20breaking%20cooperative%20relations.pdf (accessed: 11.07.2021).
20. Mazzucato M. Capitalism After the Pandemic: Getting the Recovery Right. In: Foreign Affairs. 2020. N 6 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-10-02/capitalism-after-covid-19-pandemic (accessed: 11.07.2021).
21. Rosanvallon P. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2008. 336 p.
22. Spinelli A. Managing Elections Under the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Republic of Korea’s Crucial Test. Stockholm: International IDEA. 2020 [Electronic source]. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LQHeDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=info:NN2JaIRGdkJ:scholar.google.com&ots=_1Mp1Zs88S&sig=zAbmXwpRYZUj4785mCMFiv3G1E0&redir_esc=yv=onepage&q&f=false (accessed: 24.06.2021).
23. Tarouco G. Covid-19 and the Brazilian 2020 Municipal Elections Case Study, 19 February 2021. Stockholm : IDEA, 2021. 18 p.
24. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations / ed. Diego Gambetta. New York : Basil Blackwell, 1988. 246 p.
25. Wendt A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. In: International Organization. 1992. Vol. 46. N 2. P. 391–425.
Review
For citations:
Baranov N.A. Elections as an Institution of Trust: Features of Functioning in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(10):10-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-10-21