Measuring Political Trust in a Modern Democracy
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-22-34
Abstract
Systematic review of articles on the problem of measuring political trust published in such authoritative scientific journals as “European Political Science Review”, “British Journal of Politics and International Relations”, “Parliamentary Affairs”, “Journal of Public Policy”, “Political Science Quarterly”, “Perspectives on Politics” and “International Journal of Public Opinion Research”, demonstrates considerable attention of scientists to the problem of political trust in a modern democracy and pursues as its goal the development of a methodological basis for political trust research. The methodology of the review on the problem of measuring political trust involves a comparative analysis of the results of studies in the field of assessing political trust. Among the main tasks of the article are: generalization of scientific approaches to political trust, development of methods for political trust measurements and its result interpretation, characterization of the crisis of trust in a modern democracy. The objectives of the study include identifying conceptual scientific works of Western scientists for the period 2011–2021, which allow tracing the modernization of ideas about the object of political trust, characterize the methods of measuring the level of political trust used in modern socio-political science, and reveal differences in the formation of moral and strategic trust. The differences in moral political trust, where trusting relationships are formed on the basis of the experience and personal interaction of subjects, and strategic trust, where political culture is formed and certain expectations that political leaders will make correct, rational decisions are based on fundamental ideas about the political an order where constant change forms personal and institutional ties. Measuring political trust, which is the basis of interaction between citizens and the state, is an issue of fundamental importance for characterizing the quality of democracy, and the rule of law is impossible without a high level of political trust.
About the Authors
V. P. KirilenkoRussian Federation
Viktor P. Kirilenko, Head of the Chair of International and Humanitarian Law, Doctor of Science (Jurisprudence), Professor, Honored Lawyer of Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
G. V. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Georgy V. Alekseev, Associate Professor of the Chair of Law, PhD in Jurisprudence, Associate Professor
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Almond G. A., Verba S. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Sage, 1963. 574 p.
2. Bertsou E. Rethinking political distrust // European Political Science Review. 2019. Vol. 11. Is. 2. P. 213–230.
3. Boulianne S. Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy // Political Studies. 2019. Vol. 67. Is. 1. P. 4–30.
4. Brosius A., Van Elsas E. J., De Vreese C. H. Bad News, Declining Trust? Effects of Exposure to Economic News on Trust in the European Union // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2020. Vol. 32. Is. 2. P. 223–242.
5. Cinar S. K., Kose T. Political Trust in Nonconsolidated Democracies: The Turkish Case in Comparative Perspective // Political Science Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 135. Is. 3. P. 467–497.
6. Citrin J., Stoker L. Political Trust in a Cynical Age // Annual Review of Political Science. 2018. Vol. 21. P. 49–70.
7. Claes E., Hooghe M., Marien S. A Two-Year Panel Study among Belgian Late Adolescents on the Impact of School Environment Characteristics on Political Trust // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2012. Vol. 24. Is. 2. P. 208–224.
8. Cook K. S., Hardin R., Levi M. Cooperation without Thrust? New York : Russell Sage Foundation. 2007. 272 p.
9. Davis J., Mengersen K., Bennett S., Mazerolle L. Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses // Springer Plus. 2014. Vol. 3. P. 511.
10. Edlund J., Lindh A. Institutional trust and welfare state support: On the role of trust in market institutions // Journal of Public Policy. 2013. Vol. 33. Is. 3. P. 295–317.
11. Fisher J., van Heerde-Hudson J., Tucker A. Why Both Theory and Empirics Suggest There is More than One Form of Trust: A Response to Hooghe // The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2011. Vol. 13. Is. 2. P. 276–281.
12. Fisher J., Van Heerde J., Tucker A. Does One Trust Judgement Fit All? Linking Theory and Empirics // The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2010. Vol. 12. P. 161–188.
13. Flinders M. Democracy and the Politics of Coronavirus: Trust, Blame and Understanding // Parliamentary Affairs. 2021. Vol. 74. Is. 2. P. 483–502.
14. Goldstein D., Wiedemann J. Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19 Orders // Perspectives on Politics. 2021. P. 1–27.
15. Hoffman A. M. The Structural Causes of Trusting Relationships: Why Rivals Do Not Overcome Suspicion Step by Step // Political Science Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 122. Is. 2. P. 287–312.
16. Hooghe M. Why There is Basically Only One Form of Political Trust // The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2011. Vol. 13. Is. 2. P. 269–275.
17. Kennedy W. J. Antisthenes’ Literary Fragments: Edited with Introduction, Translations, and Commentary. Sydney, 2017.
18. Kildea P., Brown A. J., Deem J. When Should the People Decide? Public Support for Direct Democracy in Australia. Parliamentary Affairs 2020, gsaa019.
19. Kydd A. In America We (Used to) Trust: U. S. Hegemony and Global Cooperation // Political Science Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 120. Is. 4. P. 619–636.
20. Levi M., Stoker L. Political Trust and Trustworthiness // Annual Review of Political Science. 2000. Vol. 3. P. 475–507.
21. Maloy J. S. Two concepts of trust // Journal of Politics. 2009. Vol. 71, Iss. 2. p. 492–505.
22. Manski C. F., Molinari F. Rounding Probabilistic Expectations in Surveys // Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 2010. Vol. 28. Is. 2. P. 219–231.
23. Marien S., Hooghe M. Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance // European Journal of Political Research. 2011. Vol. 50. P. 267–291.
24. Matthes J. Do Hostile Opinion Environments Harm Political Participation? The Moderating Role of Generalized Social Trust // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2013. Vol. 25. Is. 1. P. 23–42.
25. Mattila M. Does poor health mobilize people into action? Health, political trust, and participation // European Political Science Review. 2020. Vol. 12. Is. 1. P. 49–65.
26. Newton K., Zmerli S. Three forms of trust and their association // European Political Science Review. 2011. Vol. 3. Is. 2. P. 169–200.
27. Peyton K. Does Trust in Government Increase Support for Redistribution? // American Political Science Review. 2020. Vol. 114. Is. 2. P. 596–602.
28. Rose R., Wessels B. Money, Sex and Broken Promises: Politicians’ Bad Behaviour Reduces Trust // Parliamentary Affairs. 2019. Vol. 72. Is. 3. P. 481–500.
29. Rosenthal A. Submerged for Some? Government Visibility, Race, and American Political Trust // Perspectives on Politics. 2020. P. 1–17.
30. Scherpenzeel A. C., Das M. “True” longitudinal and probability-based Internet panels: Evidence from the Netherlands // Social and behavioral research and the internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies / Das M., Ester P., Kaczmirek L. (eds.). Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis. 2010. P. 77–104.
31. Steen-Johnsen K., Slagsvold Winsvold M. Islamist Terrorism, Out-Group Trust, and Motivation to Control Prejudice // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2020. Vol. 32. Is. 3. P. 621–640.
32. Sturgis P., Smith P. Assessing the Validity of Generalized Trust Questions: What Kind of Trust are we Measuring? // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2010. Vol. 22. Is. 1. P. 74–92.
33. Sztompka P. Trust, Distrust and Two Paradoxes of Democracy // European Journal of Social Theory. 1998. Vol. 1. Is. 1. P. 19–32.
34. Sztompka P. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge University Press. 2000. 228 p.
35. Tyler T., Fagan J. Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities? // Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. 2006. Vol. 6. P. 231–276.
36. Uslaner E. M. (еd.). The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2018. 752 p.
37. Uslaner E. M. Segregation and Mistrust: Diversity, Isolation, and Social Cohesion. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012.
38. Uslaner E. M. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2002. 298 p.
39. Verhaegen S., Hooghe M., Quintelier E. The effect of political trust and trust in European citizens on European identity // European Political Science Review. 2017. Vol. 9. Is. 2. P. 161–181.
40. Voogd R., van der Meer T., van der Brug W. Political Trust as a Determinant of Volatile Vote Intentions: Separating Within- From Between-Person Effects // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2019. Vol. 31. Is. 4. P. 669–693.
41. Wals S. C., Rudolph T. J. Lost in Acculturation? Premigratory Exposure to Democracy and Immigrants’ Political Trust in the United States // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2019. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 70–92.
42. Warren M. E. (ed.). Democracy and trust. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999. 370 p.
43. Weible C., Heikkila T., Pierce J. Understanding rationales for collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts // Journal of Public Policy. 2018. Vol. 38. Is. 1. P. 1–25.
44. Whiteley P. Does Citizenship Education Work? Evidence from a Decade of Citizenship Education in Secondary Schools in England // Parliamentary Affairs. 2014. Vol. 67. Is. 3. P. 513–535.
45. Wong T., Kang S., Valdivia C., Espino J. at al. How Interior Immigration Enforcement Affects Trust in Law Enforcement // Perspectives on Politics. 2020. P. 1–14.
46. Wroe A., Allen N., Birch S. The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption // European Political Science Review. 2013. Vol. 5. Is. 2. P. 175–195.
47. Yap O. How political trust matters in emergent democracies: Evidence from East and Southeast Asia // Journal of Public Policy. 2019. Vol. 39. Is. 2. P. 295–328.
48. Zhang R. J., Liu J. H., Brown G., Gil de Zúñiga H. A Network Analysis of Global Trust Across 11 Democratic Countries // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2021. Vol. 33. Is. 1. P. 147–158.
49. Zmerli S., Newton K. Social trust and attitudes toward democracy // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 72. P. 706–724.
Review
For citations:
Kirilenko V.P., Alekseev G.V. Measuring Political Trust in a Modern Democracy. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(10):22-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-22-34