Conceptual and Mathematical Models, Methods, and Technologies for the Study of the Digital Transformation of Economic and Social Systems: A Literature Review and Research Agenda (Part II)
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-12-111-125
Abstract
The results of the review of the subject field on the research of the digital transformation of economic and social systems is carried out (part II). We reviewed main theoretical, mathematical tools which could allow solving unsolved problems. The review of such main theoretical tools that can become the basis for developing the “activity paradigm” of research is carried out.
About the Authors
A. S. Geyda
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA); St. Petersburg Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Geyda - Associate Professor of the Business Informatics Department of North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA, PhD in Technical Science, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher of the St. Petersburg Federal Research Center RAS.
St. Petersburg
T. N. Gurieva
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Taiana N. Gurieva - Associate Professor of the Business Informatics Department of North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA, PhD in Technical Science, Associate Professor.
St. Petersburg
V. N. Naumov
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir N. Naumov - Head of the Business Informatics Department of North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA, Doctor of Science, Professor.
St. Petersburg
References
1. Karanasios S. Framing ICT4D Research Using Activity Theory: A Match between the ICT4D Field and Theory? // Information Technologies & International Development. 2014. Vol. 10. N 2. P. 1–17.
2. Barthelmess P. A View of Software Development Environments Based on Activity Theory / P. Barthelmess, K. M. Anderson // Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 2002. Vol. 11. N 1–2. P. 13–37.
3. Theories Used in Information Systems Research: Identifying Theory Networks in Leading IS Journals / Sanghee Lim, T. Saldanha, Suresh Malladi, Nigel P. Melville : ICIS, 2009.
4. Lai P. C. The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology // Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management. 2017. 14(1):21–38.
5. Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline / Sidorova, Evangelopoulos, Valacich, Ramakrishnan // MIS Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 32. N 3. P. 467.
6. Cheung R. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning / R. Cheung, D. Vogel // Computers & Education. 2013. Vol. 63. N 2. P. 160–175.
7. Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of task-technology fit model, social motivation, and self-determination theory / I. U. Khan, Z. Hameed, Y. Yu at al. // Telematics and Informatics. 2018. Vol. 35. N 4. P. 964–978.
8. Ma Q. The Technology Acceptance Model / Q. Ma, L. Liu // Advanced Topics in End User Computing, Volume 4 / ed. S. Clarke M. A. Mahmood : IGI Global, 2005. P. 112–128.
9. Marangunić N. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013 / N. Marangunić, A. Granić // Universal Access in the Information Society. 2015. Vol. 14, N 1. P. 81–95.
10. Urbach N. The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success / N. Urbach, B. Müller // Information Systems Theory / ed. Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, S. L. Schneberger. New York : Springer New York, 2012. P. 1–18.
11. Thomas M. Assessing the role of IT-enabled process virtualization on green IT adoption / M. Thomas, D. Costa, T. Oliveira // Information Systems Frontiers. 2016. Vol. 18, N 4. P. 693– 710.
12. Patel N. V. The Theory of Deferred Action: Purposive Design as Deferred Systems for Emergent Organisations // Information Systems Theory / ed. Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, S. L. Schneberger. New York : Springer New York, 2012. P. 125–149.
13. Kor Y. Y. Edith Penrose’s (1959) Contributions to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management / Y. Y. Kor, J. T. Mahoney // Journal of Management Studies. 2004. Vol. 41. N 1. P. 183–191.
14. Dong J. Q. Business value of big data analytics: A systems-theoretic approach and empirical test / J. Q. Dong, C.-H. Yang // Information & Management. 2020. Vol. 57. N 1. P. 103–124.
15. Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition / L. B. L. Amui, C. J. C. Jabbour, A. B. L. de Sousa Jabbour, D. Kannan // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Vol. 142. N 6. P. 308–322.
16. Parida V. Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry: Past Achievements and Future Promises / V. Parida, D. Sjodin, W. Reim // Sustainability. 2019. Vol. 11. N 2. P. 391.
17. Briggs R. O. The yield shift theory of satisfaction and its application to the IS/IT domain / R. O. Briggs, B. A. Reinig, G. J. de Vreede // Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2008. Vol. 9. N 5. P. 267–293.
18. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections // Psychology & health. 2011. Vol. 26. N 9. P. 1113–1127.
19. Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World / S. Nambisan, K. Lyytinen, A. Majchrzak, M. Song // MIS Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 41. N 1. P. 223–238.
20. Karanasios S. Toward a unified view of technology and activity // Information Technology & People. 2018. Vol. 31. N 1. P. 134–155.
21. Sannino A. Cultural-historical activity theory: founding insights and new challenges / A. Sannino, Y. Engeström // Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2018. Vol. 14. N 3. P. 43–56.
22. Fredkin E. An Introduction to Digital Philosophy // International Journal of Theoretical Physics. 2003. Vol. 42. N 2. P. 189–247.
23. Aslaksen E. W. The System Concept and Its Application to Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
24. Igira F. T. Cultural Historical Activity Theory / F. T. Igira, J. Gregory // Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems / ed. Y. K. Dwivedi, B. Lal, M. D. Williams, S. L. Schneberger. M. Wade : IGI Global, 2009. P. 434–454.
25. Allen D. Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior / D. Allen, S. Karanasios, M. Slavova // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011. Vol. 62. N 4. P. 776–788.
26. Challenges for Action Theories / G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, J. van Leeuwen, M. Thielscher. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.
27. Piovesan F. Reflections on combining action research and actor-network theory // Action Research. 2020. Vol. 3. N 2. 147675032091916.
28. Dick B. Theory in action research / B. Dick, E. Stringer, C. Huxham // Action Research. 2009. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 5–12.
29. Gustavsen B. Action research, practical challenges and the formation of theory // Action Research. 2008. Vol. 6. N 4. P. 421–437.
30. Staron M. Action Research in Software Engineering. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020.
31. Lozovanu D. D. Optimization and multiobjective control of time-discrete systems / D. D. Lozovanu, S. Pickl. Berlin : Springer, 2009.
32. Reiter R. Knowledge in action. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 2001.
33. Lizotte D. J. Multi-Objective Markov Decision Processes for Data-Driven Decision Support / D. J. Lizotte, E. B. Laber // Journal of machine learning research. 2016. Vol. 17.
34. Complex decisions made simple: a primer on stochastic dynamic programming / L. Marescot, G. Chapron, I. Chadès at al. // Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2013. Vol. 4. N 9. P. 872–884.
35. Hinderer K. Dynamic optimization / K. Hinderer, U. Rieder, M. Stieglitz. Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2016.
36. Dynamics on and of complex networks III / F. Ghanbarnejad, R. Saha Roy, F. Karimi at al. Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2019.
37. Barrat A. Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks / A. Barrat, M. Barthlemy, A. Vespignani. Leiden : Cambridge University Press, 2008. 367 p.
38. Fu X. Propagation dynamics on complex networks / X. Fu, M. Small, G. Chen. Chichester : Wiley / Higher Education Press, 2014.
39. Quax R. SEECN: simulating complex systems using dynamic complex networks / R. Quax, D. A. Bader, P.M. A. Sloot // International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering. 2011. Vol. 9. N 2. P. 201–214.
40. Zinilli A. Competitive project funding and dynamic complex networks: evidence from Projects of National Interest (PRIN) // Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 108. N 2. P. 633–652.
41. Rashid A. Dynamic Relationships in Object Oriented Databases: A Uniform Approach / A. Rashid, P. Sawyer // Database and Expert Systems Applications / ed. G. Goos, J. Hartmanis at al. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. P. 26–35.
42. Abu el Ata N. Solving the Dynamic Complexity Dilemma / N. Abu el Ata, M. J. Perks. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014.
43. Grösser S. N. Complexity Management and System Dynamics Thinking // Dynamics of LongLife Assets: From Technology Adaptation to Upgrading the Business Model / ed. S. N. Grösser, A. Reyes-Lecuona, G. Granholm. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017. P. 69–92.
44. Geyda A. Modeling of Information Operations Effects: Technological Systems Example / A. Geyda, I. Lysenko // Future Internet. 2019. Vol. 11. N 3. P. 62.
45. Gonzalez C. Dynamic Decision Making: Learning Processes and New Research Directions / C. Gonzalez, P. Fakhari, J. Busemeyer // Human factors. 2017. Vol. 59. N 5. P. 713–721.
46. Chen G. Fundamentals ofcomplex networks / G. Chen, X. Wang, X. Li. Chichester : WileyBlackwell, 2015.
47. Nestedness in complex networks: Observation, emergence, and implications / M. S. Mariani, Z.-M. Ren, J. Bascompte, C. J. Tessone // Physics Reports. 2019. Vol. 813. N 1. P. 1–90.
48. Synchronization on complex networks of networks / R. Lu, W. Yu, J. Lu, A. Xue // IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems. 2014. Vol. 25. N 11. P. 2110–2118.
49. Engeström, Y. From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activitytheoretical studies of work and learning / Y. Engeström, A. Sannino // Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2021. Vol. 28. N 1. P. 4–23.
50. Stichweh R. Systems Theory as an Alternative to Action Theory? The Rise of ’Communication’ as a Theoretical Option // Acta Sociologica. 2000. Vol. 43. N 1. P. 5–13.
51. Patel N. V. Deferred Action: Theoretical Model of Process Architecture Design for Emergent Business Processes / N. V. Patel, R. Simons. 2011. 29 c.
52. Malinetsky G. G., Potapov A. B., Podlazov A. V. Nonlinear dynamics: Approaches, results, hopes. URSS, 2016. 280 p. (In Rus).
53. Jung N. The Role of Process Engineering in the Digital Transformation // 30th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier, 2020. P. 721–726.
54. Transforming systems engineering through digital engineering / M. A. Bone, M. R. Blackburn, D. H. Rhodes at all. // The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Tech nology. 2019. Vol. 16. N 4. P. 339–355.
55. Digitization Driven Design A Guideline to Initialize Digital Business Model Creation / T. Greff, C. Neu, D. Johann, D. Werth // Business Modeling and Software Design / ed. B. Shishkov. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. P. 308–318.
56. Kitchenham B. A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering / B. Kitchenham, P. Brereton // Information and Software Technology. 2013. Vol. 55. N 12. P. 2049–2075.
57. Walczowski L. T. A Digital Engineering Curriculum for the New Millennium / L. T. Walczowski, K. R. Dimond, W.A. J. Waller // The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education. 2000. Vol. 37. N 1. P. 108–117.
58. Digital engineering strategy // Department of Defense Office report of the Deputy Assistant Secretary, JUNE 2018. P. 1–36.
59. Abouzahra A. Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic literature review / A. Abouzahra, A. Sabraoui, K. Afdel // Information and Software Technology. 2020. Vol. 125. N 12. P. 106316.
60. Marletto C. Constructor theory of probability / C. Marletto // Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences. 2016. Vol. 472. N 2192. Article: 20150883.
61. Deutsch D. Constructor theory // Synthese. 2013. Vol. 190. N 18. P. 4331–4359.
Review
For citations:
Geyda A.S., Gurieva T.N., Naumov V.N. Conceptual and Mathematical Models, Methods, and Technologies for the Study of the Digital Transformation of Economic and Social Systems: A Literature Review and Research Agenda (Part II). Administrative Consulting. 2021;(12):111-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-12-111-125
Views:
367
Email this article 