Public Administration Transformation Based on Research in Social Neurosciences in the Context of Sustainable Development (Part 2)
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-5-83-92
Abstract
The second part of the article continues to consider the new approach to public administration and social structure proposed in the first part with the involvement of the neuroscientific method of social neurosciences. The advantage of the neuroscientific method of social neurosciences is that it provides empirical validation of theoretical positions; is focused on humans, as it studies the neurobiological response of humans in different areas of social life; shows the person’s true attitude to the situation before their conscious control; demonstrates how the social device affects the brain, a person’s neuropsychiatric state, behavior, and health in general.
About the Author
N. M. SlanevskayaRussian Federation
Nina M. Slanevskaya, PhD in Political Science, Director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Neuroscience from 2009–2018
St. Petersburg
References
1. Bekhtereva N. P. The Magic of the Brain and the Labyrinths of Life. M. : Sova, 2008. (In Rus).
2. Slanevskaya N. M. Brain, thinking and society. 2 part. SPb. : Center for Interdisciplinary Neuroscience, 2012. (In Rus).
3. Slanevskaya N. M. Cases of clear consciousness in clinical death. Yekaterinburg: Publishing solutions, 2020. (In Rus).
4. Beauregard M., O’Leary D. The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist’s Case for the Existence of the Soul. New York: HarperOne, 2007.
5. Farwell L. A., Smith S. S. Using Brain MERMER Testing to Detect Concealed Knowledge Despite Efforts to Conceal // Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2001. N 46 (1). P. 135–143.
6. Findlay J. C. Immunity at Risk and Art Therapy // eds. N. Hass-Cohen, R. Carr / Art Therapy and Clinical Neuroscience. London and Philadelphia : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008. P. 207–222.
7. Greene J. The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul // ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong / Moral Psychology, the Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. Massachusetts : MIT Press. 2008. Vol. 3. P. 35–79.
8. Hein G., Singer T. I Feel How You Feel but Not Always: The Empathic Brain and Its Modulation // Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2008. N 18. P. 153–158.
9. Knutson B., Wimmer G. E., Kuhnen C. M., Winkielman P. Nucleus Accumbens Activation Mediates the Influence of Reward Cues on Financial Risk Taking // NeuroReport. 2008. N 19. P. 509–513.
10. Lieberman M. D., Schreiber D., Ochsner K. Is Political Cognition Like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking // Political Psychology. 2003. Vol. 24. N 4. P. 681–704.
11. Lommel P. Consciousness Beyond Life. The Science of the Near-Death Experience. New York : HaperOne, 2010.
12. Newberg A., Waldman M. How God Changes Your Brain. New York : Ballantine Books, 2009.
13. Rosenfeld J. P. ’Brain Fingerprinting:’ A Critical Analysis // The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. 2005. Vol. 4. N 1. P. 20–37.
14. Schwartz J. M., Begley S. The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force. New York : Regan Books, 2002.
15. Stout L. A. Taking Conscience Seriously // ed. P. J. Zak / Moral Markets. The Critical Role of Values in the Economy. Princeton and Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2008. P. 157–172.
16. Tingley D. Neurological Imaging as Evidence in Political Science: a Review, Critique, and Guiding Assessment // Social Science Information. 2006. Vol. 45. N 1. P. 5–33.
17. Zak P. J. Values and Value / Moral Markets. The Critical Role of Values in the Economy. Princeton and Oxford : Princeton University Press. 2008. P. 259–279.
Review
For citations:
Slanevskaya N.M. Public Administration Transformation Based on Research in Social Neurosciences in the Context of Sustainable Development (Part 2). Administrative Consulting. 2022;(5):83-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-5-83-92
Views:
420
Email this article 