Relations between the Russian Orthodox Church and the State in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Context of a Change in Political Paradigms and Digitalization
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-7-8-22
Abstract
The article is devoted to the characterization of the relationship between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian state in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the digitalization of society, with an emphasis on the technological aspect. The context of church-state relations during the pandemic period in the works of foreign and domestic authors is not the same: in Western liberal publications, attention is focused on the restrictions on democratic norms and liberal freedoms in the countries of the world, and in the works of Russian scientists, on the adaptation of state-confessional relations to the conditions of the pandemic, as well as on the processes of internal church life. To achieve this goal, the work uses institutional, culturological and constructivist approaches that allow scientifically arguing the author’s position. It was found that representatives of almost all religious denominations recognized the existential threat to humanity posed by the coronavirus and sided with the actions of state and municipal authorities to combat the pandemic. From the very beginning of the fight against the pandemic, the ROC built its policy on the basis of the recommendations of the secular authorities, even in cases where the possibility of performing religious rites and holding services was seriously limited. The internal conservative opposition did not radically influence the official policy of the church, while at the same time there is an increase in the social and civic activity of the ROC. The attitude to digitalization is associated with an understanding of the danger posed by technological capabilities in connection with the strengthening of state control over citizens and the restriction of rights and freedoms, including in the confessional sphere. At the same time, the church seeks to use the possibilities of modern technology to expand its influence, including among young people.
About the Author
N. A. Baranov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay A. Baranov, Professor of the Chair of International Relations, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Baranov N. A. Interaction between church and state in modern Russia // Man. Community. Control [Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye]. 2009. N 4. P. 97–108 (In Rus).
2. Lunkin R. Mechanisms of Religious Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic // Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the IE RAS [Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik IYe RAN]. 2020. N 2. P. 104–109 (In Rus).
3. Lunkin R. N. Socio-political consequences of the pandemic for the Russian Orthodox Church: unlocking the internal potential of civic engagement and social service // Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: Political Science [Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya]. 2020. V. 22. N 4. P. 547–558 (In Rus).
4. Lunkin R. N. Churches in politics and politics in churches. How modern Christianity is changing European society: a monograph. M. : IE RAS: Nestor-History Publishing House, 2020. 504 p. (In Rus).
5. North D. Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy / Per. from English. A. N. Nesterenko; foreword and scientific ed. B. Z. Milner. M.: Foundation of the economic book “Beginnings”, 1997. 180 p. (In Rus).
6. Revelation of St. John the Theologian // Bible. Books of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. M.: Russian Bible Society, 2001. P. 1325–1346 (In Rus).
7. Pochta Yu. M. State-confessional relations in Russia in the context of a pandemic: challenges and responses // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science [Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya]. 2020. V. 22. N 4. P. 559–578 (In Rus).
8. Przevorsky A. Physical survival is an imperative, everything else is a luxury // Russia in Global Affairs [Rossiya v global’noy politike]. 2020. N 3 [Electronic source]. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/fizicheskoe-vyzhivanie-imperativ/ (accessed: 19.01.2022). (In Rus).
9. Religion in modern Russia: events and discourses of the pandemic: monograph / M. M. Mchedlov [i dr.]; ed. M. M. Mchedlova. M. : RUDN, 2021. 352 p. (In Rus).
10. Modern political science: methodology / ed. O. V. Gaman-Golutvina, A. I. Nikitin. 2nd ed., rev. and additional M. : Aspect Press Publishing House, 2019. 776 p. (In Rus).
11. Uzlaner D. The post-secular turn: how to think about religion in the 21st century. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2020. 416 p. (In Rus). 12. Berengaut A. Democracies are Better at Fighting Outbreaks // The Atlantic, 24 February 2020. [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/why-democraciesare-better-fightingoutbreaks/606976/ (accessed: 19.01.2022).
12. Berger P. L., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books, Garden City, NY, 1966. 249 p.
13. Brown F. et al. How Will the Coronavirus Reshape Democracy and Governance Globally? //Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 6 April 2020 [Electronic source]. URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/04/06/how-will-coronavirus-reshape-democracy-and-governanceglobally-pub-81470 (accessed: 19.01.2022).
14. Fukuyama F. The Pandemic and Political Order // Foreign Affairs, July/August 2020.
15. Leininger J. Tackling the pandemic without doing away with democracy // German Development Institute (DIE), 27 April 2020 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/German_Development_Institute_Leininger_27.04.2020.pdf (accessed: 19.01.2022).
16. Onuf N. G. World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S. C., 1989.
17. Roth K. How Authoritarians Are Exploiting the COVID-19 Crisis to Grab Power // Human Rights Watch, 3 April 2020 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/04/03/howauthoritarians-are-exploiting-covid-19-crisis-grab-power (accessed: 19.01.2022).
18. Staak S. van der. Democracy experts should seek a central role in shaping the post-coronavirus order // London School of Economics and Political Sciences (LSE), 20 May 2020 [Electronic source]. URL: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2020/05/18/democracy-experts-should-seeka-central-role-in-shaping-the-post-coronavirus-order/ (accessed: 19.01.2022).
19. Wendt A. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics // International Organization. 1992. Vol. 46. N 2. P. 391–425.
Review
For citations:
Baranov N.A. Relations between the Russian Orthodox Church and the State in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Context of a Change in Political Paradigms and Digitalization. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(7):8-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-7-8-22
Views:
442
Email this article 