Model of Effective Business Formation
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-7-66-87
Abstract
The task of improving business performance always raises the problem of choosing the most effective ways to ensure it. The article is devoted to the substantiation of the business efficiency criterion, in accordance with the requirements of which those areas of business development that provide it with the greatest efficiency should be determined. The article puts forward and confirms the hypothesis that, according to the selected criterion the greatest efficiency can be provided not only by the variant of the simultaneous implementation of all possible directions for increasing efficiency, but also by the variant of their implementation in parts — in the form of sets of directions. The authors propose a model for the formation of an effective business, using Pareto optimality and implemented on the basis of two developed Algorithms, which is illustrated by a numerical example.
About the Authors
V. G. Khalin
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir G. Khalin, Professor of the Chair of Information Systems in Economics, Doctor of Science (Economic), Professor
Saint Petersburg
G. V. Chernova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina V. Chernova, Professor of the Chair of Risk management and Insurance, Doctor of Science (Economic), Professor
Saint Petersburg
S. A. Kalayda
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Kalayda, Associated Professor of the Chair of Risk management and Insurance, PhD in Economics, Associated professor
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Bryuzgina A. O., Likhter A. V. Approbation of the methodology for assessing the economic efficiency of digital technology in the company’s business processes // Management of social and economic systems [Menedzhment social’nyh i ekonomicheskih system] 2020. N 2. P. 15–21. (In Rus).
2. Vapne G. “Evaluation criterion” in system analysis // Collection of scientific papers of the XXIII International Scientific and Practical Conference “System Analysis in Design and Management”. 2019 (SAEC-2019). N 1. Vol. XXIII. P. 154–164. (In Rus).
3. Vostroknutov A. E., Loiko V. I. Methodology for Forming a Business Model of Corporate Integrated Structures and Development of Algorithms and Models for Its Validity // New Technologies [Novye tehnologii]. 2018. N 3. P. 101–109. (In Rus).
4. Vostroknutov A. E., Loiko V. I. Methodological aspects of the formation and strategic development of the business model of small business organizations // New technologies [Novye tehnologii]. 2018. N 3. P. 92–100. (In Rus).
5. Donets O. V., Maidanevich P. N. Methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of innovative activities // Bulletin of the Omsk State Agrarian University [Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta]. 2015. N 4 (20). P. 102–108. (In Rus).
6. Zatevakhina A., Supataev T. Methods of project management in solving problems of ensuring economic security in the studies of Russian and foreign scientists // Society and Economics [Obshhestvo i ekonomika]. 2021. N 12. P. 120–130. (In Rus). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760017502-1.
7. Kan E. D. Approaches and methods for assessing the effectiveness of the enterprise // Economics and business: theory and practice [Ekonomika i biznes: teorija i praktika]. 2018. N 4. P. 118–122. (In Rus).
8. Kozlova S. Improvement of methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of state (municipal) property management // Society and Economics [Obshhestvo i ekonomika]. 2021. N 12. P. 57–72. (In Rus). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760017822-3.
9. Kokuytseva T. V., Ovchinnikova O. P. Methodological approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of digital transformation of enterprises in high-tech industries // Creative Economy [Kreativnaja ekonomika]. 2021. Vol. 15. N 6. P. 2413–2430. (In Rus). DOI: 10.18334/ce.15.6.112192.
10. Korsunova N. N. Evaluation of the feasibility of creating innovative technologies for banking services to corporate clients in the context of the transition to a digital economy // Financial economics [Finansovaya ekonomika]. 2022. N 1. P. 44–51. (In Rus).
11. Krause R. P. Study of methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of IT projects at enterprises // Business education in the knowledge economy [Biznes-obrazovanie v ekonomike znanij]. 2020. N 3 (17). P. 87–92. (In Rus).
12. Kreneva S. G. Development of methods for analyzing the effectiveness of investment projects in the financial management of a company based on a model of system dynamics // Innovative technologies of management and law [Innovatsionnye tekhnologii upravleniya i pravo]. 2020. N 1 (27). P. 50–55. (In Rus).
13. Kretova A. Yu. Economic approach to assessing the effectiveness of the enterprise // Bulletin of ASU, ser. ≪Economy≫ [Vestnik ASU, ser. ≪Economy≫. Iss. 2 (240). 2019. P. 88–95. (In Russian).
14. Kuklina E. A., Semkova D. N. Digital Technologies as a Key Tool for Improving the Efficiency of the Russian Oil and Gas Industry in Modern Operating Conditions // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2020. N 4(136). P. 53–65. DOI 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-4-53-65. (In Rus).
15. Minervin I. G. Business models: emergence, development and prospects for research // Social and Humanitarian Sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 2: Economy. Abstract journal. 2017. N 2. P. 105–109. (In Rus).
16. Pakhomov A. P. To apply or not to apply the Pareto principle in practice? // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Economy [Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Ekonomika. 2010. N 1. P. 5–12. (In Rus).
17. Raevsky S. V., Varyukhin S. E., Isaev V. A. Methods for assessing the effectiveness of business structure reform project management // Problems of Economics and Legal Practice [Problemy ekonomiki i juridicheskoj praktiki. 2017. N 6. P. 36–39. (In Rus).
18. Savitskaya G. V. Indicators of financial efficiency of entrepreneurial activity: rationale and calculation methodology // Financial analysis [Finansovyj analiz]. 2012. N 39 (294). P. 14–22.
19. Theory of decision making. In 2 volumes. Volume 2: textbook and workshop for undergraduate and graduate students / edited by V. G. Khalin. Moscow: Urait Publishing House, 2017. 431 p. (In Rus).
20. Khalin V. G., Chernova G. V., Kalayda S. A. Economic Ecosystems and Their Classification //Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2021. N 2. P. 38–54.
21. Ismail S. Drivers of value for money public private partnership projects in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting. 2013. Vol. 21. N 3, P. 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-06-2013-0042.
22. Khajavia S., Partanenb J., Holmstroma J., Tuomib J. Risk reduction in new product launch: A hybrid approach combining direct digital and tool-based manufacturing // Computers in Industry. Vol. 74, December 2015, P. 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.08.008.
23. Wirtz B. W., Pistoia A., Ullrich S., Gottel V. Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives // Long Range Planning. 49 (2016). P. 36–54.
24. Cong X. Performance Evaluation of Public-Private Partnership Projects from the Perspective of Efficiency, Economic, Effectiveness, and Equity: A Study of Residential Renovation Projects inChina Li Ma // Sustainability 2018, 10 (6), 1951. DOI: 10.3390/su10061951.
Review
For citations:
Khalin V.G., Chernova G.V., Kalayda S.A. Model of Effective Business Formation. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(7):66-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-7-66-87
Views:
366
Email this article 