Strategizing the National Economy during a Period of Burgeoning Technological Sovereignty

   Topicality. The growing instability of economic systems, the transition of the global market space from a stationary state to a large extent during an extraordinary period are accompanied by an intensification of interregional and international competition for resources and factors of expanded reproduction. This is associated with such significant structural changes and transformations that they actualize the search and justification of new strategic vectors of socio-economic development of national economies for the period of “post-normality” and a longer extraordinary period. It is the application of an effective strategizing methodology that allows the developers of any strategy to focus on the search for new strategic opportunities and breakthrough transformations, focuses on determining and choosing the right and long-term vector of development of the strategizing object. The authors emphasize that “new horizons” strategies or innovative development strategies based on technological competitive advantages are the most effective, which, in the context of limited access to imports of high-tech developments and the impossibility of their cross-border transfer, in particular to Russia, forms a predominant focus on the avant-garde domestic technological developments in the justification of strategic priorities. This causes the activation of processes to form the national economy technological sovereignty and emphasizes its strategic importance.
   Aim. Determine the basic directions of strategizing the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty.
   Tasks. Designate the strategic role of scientific and industrial sectors in the process of national economy transition to technological independence, formulate the financial and the human resources development aspects of strategizing the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty.
   Methods. The scientific research is based on the general theory of Strategy and strategizing methodology developed by the Center for Strategic Research at the Institute of Mathematical Research of Complex Systems and the Economic and Financial Strategy Department at Moscow School of Economics at Lomonosov Moscow State University with the leadership of Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, professor Vladimir L. Kvint.
   Results. The authors have shown the relationship between strategizing and the processes of formation the national economy technological sovereignty, clarified the role of industrial strategizing in the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty, formulated key aspects of the financial strategy and the labor potential development strategy of the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty.
   Conclusions. The process of forming the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty must comply with the strategizing methodology, follow the long-term regulated stages and methodological principles for the development and implementation of an appropriate national strategy for the transition to technological independence. Particular attention should be paid to industrial and financial strategizing of the transition to technological independence and strategizing the labor potential development of the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty.

1. Alimuradov M. K. Interregional Competition for Strategic Economic Factors // Strategizing: Theory and Practice [Strategirovanie: teoriya i praktika]. 2021. Vol. 1, no. 2. P. 163–172. DOI: 10.21603/2782-2435-2021-1-2-163-172 (In Rus).

2. Alimuradov M. K. Elements and Stages of Regional Financial Strategies Development // Strategizing: Theory and Practice [Strategirovanie: teoriya i praktika]. 2022. Vol. 2, no. 2, P. 199–211. DOI: 10.21603/2782-2435-2022-2-2-199-211 (In Rus).

3. Bodrunov S. D. Global Crises of the XXI Century Exposes the Contradictions of the Modern Socio-Economic Model // Sociological Studies [Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2020. Iss. 10. P. 146–157. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009808-1 (In Rus).

4. Kvint V. L. The Concept of Strategizing. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 2020. 170 p. (In Rus).

5. Kvint V. L. Search and Investigation of Philosophical Base of the Theory of Strategy. Interrelation of Philosophical and Strategic Thinking // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2016. N 1. P. 15–21. (In Rus).

6. Kvint V. L., Bodrunov S. D. Strategizing the society transformation: Knowledge, technology, noonomics. St. Petersburg: Witte Institute for New Industrial Development; 2021. 351 p. (In Rus).

7. Kvint V. L., Novikova I. V., Alimuradov M. K. Alignment of Global and National Interest with Regional Strategic Priorities // Economics and Management [Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2021. Vol. 27, no. 11. P. 900–909. (In Rus). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2021-11-900-909.

8. Kvint V. L., Okrepilov V. V. Theory and practice of the relationship between the categories „good life” and „quality of life” // Quality Economics [Ekonomika kachestva]. 2013. N 4. P. 1–16 (In Rus).

9. Kvint V. L., Trachuk A. V., Dzgoev V. D. Strategizing national and regional innovation systems. Moscow: Publishing house „Budget”, 2021. 199 p. (In Russ).

10. Kvint V. L., Khvorostyanaya A. S., Sasaev N. I. Advanced Technologies in Strategizing // Economics and Management [Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2020. N 11. P. 1170–1179. (In Rus). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2020-11-1170-1179.

11. Conceptual future of Kuzbass: strategic contours of development priorities up to 2071. 50-year perspective / ed. V. L. Kvint. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 2022. 283 p. (in Rus). DOI: 10.21603/978-5-8353-2812-3.

12. Leonidova E. G., Sidorov M. A. Structural changes in the economy: searching for sectoral drivers of growth // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast [Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz]. 2019. Vol. 12, no. 6. P. 166–181. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.9 (In Rus).

13. Maksimtsev I. A., Mezhevich N. M. The World economy after the shock of the first half of 2020: old problems in new conditions // Proceedings of St. Petersburg State Economic University [Izvestiya SPbGEU]. 2020. N 3. P. 22–27 (In Rus).

14. Novikova I. V. The Concept of Employment Strategy for the Digital Economy. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 2020. 254 p. (In Rus).

15. Novikova I. V. Strategizing of the Human Resources Development: Main Elements and Stages // Strategizing: Theory and Practice [Strategirovanie: teoriya i praktika]. 2021. Vol. 1, no. 1. P. 57–65.

16. Novikova I. V. Strategic workforce management. Moscow: KnoRus; 2022. 180 p. (In Rus).

17. Sasaev N. I. The Role of Industrial Strategizing in the Post-Normal Period // Proceedings of St. Petersburg State Economic University [Izvestiya SPbGEU]. 2022. N 3. P. 107–110. (In Rus).

18. Sasaev N. I. Strategic Analysis of Trends in the Development of the Russian Far East Gas Industry // Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice [Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika]. 2022. Vol. 21, no. 3. P. 416–441. DOI: 10.24891/ea.21.3.416 (In Rus).

19. Bernanke Ben S. Essays on the Great Depression. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. doi: 10.1515/9781400820276

20. Diamond Douglas W., and Raghuram G. Rajan. The Credit Crisis: Conjectures about Causes and Remedies. 2009. American Economic Review, 99 (2): 606–610.

21. Kvint V. L. Strategy for the Global Market: Theory and Practical applications. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2016. 519 p.

22. Kvint V. L. The Global Emerging Market: Strategic Management and Economics. Routledge. NY, 2009. 488 p.

23. Ohmae K. The mind of the strategist: the art of Japanese management. New McGraw-Hill, New York. 1982. Vol. 5. 283 p.