The Republic of Belarus and Ukraine: Contrasts of Ethnic and Linguistic Identity
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-10-145-155
Abstract
The Republic of Belarus is the only state of the Near Abroad, where, with a reduction in the share of the Russian population, since the beginning of the 21st century, there has been an increase in the proportion of citizens who called Russian their native language and actively used it in everyday life. Ukraine, despite the signifcant similarity with the Republic of Belarus in the linguistic structure of the population, is the direct opposite of the latter in the course of linguistic processes. The purpose of the article is to compare the course of ethnolinguistic processes in these two neighboring countries. The study assesses the change in the size of the main ethnic communities and linguistic groups of Ukraine in the period from 2001 to 2021, depending on the scenario of ethnolinguistic dynamics — actually “Ukrainian” and “Belarusian”. The study revealed that in the population of Ukraine the main shifts took place within the groups of bilinguals (or biethnophores) that changed their identity depending on the political situation. Despite Ukraine’s notable successes in “titulating” and linguistic assimilation of the non-Ukrainian population, in the transition to the “Belarusian” version of the national policy, due to the high proportion of bilinguals in the population, these processes can reverse.
Keywords
ethno-demographic processes,
ethnic structure,
assimilation,
native language,
everyday language,
bilingualism
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-05-00369 “Transformation of the Ethnocultural Space of Post-Soviet States: Factors, Trends, Prospects”.
About the Authors
A. G. Manakov
Pskov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrei G. Manakov, Professor of the Department of Geography, Doctor of Geographical Sciences, Professor
Pskov
N. K. Terenina
Pskov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
natalia K. terenina, Docent of the Department of Geography, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor
Pskov
References
1. Avksentiev V. A., Aksyumov B. V., Gricenko G. D. Ethnicity in political conflicts: ethnicization of politics and politicization of ethnicity // Political Science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2020. N 3. P. 74–97 (in Rus).
2. Balich N. L., Haritonov I. N. Ethnic identity and practices of national communities in Belarus // Sociological almanac [Sociologicheski almanah]. 2018. N 9. P. 132–149 (in Rus).
3. Venetski I. G. Probabilistic Methods in Demography [Veroyatnostnye metody v demografi]. Moscow : Finance and statistics, 1981. 223 p. (in Rus).
4. Efmov S. A. Where did the Russians or “communicating vessels” of ethno-linguistic selfidentifcation disappear: Ukraine, 1989–2001 // History and modernity [Istoriya i sovremennost]. 2009. N 1. P. 177–189 (in Rus).
5. Manakov A. G., Danilkina N. V. The main trends of ethnic transformation in the Post-Soviet area // Pskov Journal of Regional Studies [Pskovski regionologicheski zhurnal]. 2021. N 1 (45). P. 21–36 (in Rus).
6. Manakov A. G., Sokolov A. S., Suvorkov P. E. Formation of the ethnic and language structure of the population of the Republic of Belarus and ethno-demographic forecast until 2069 // Pskov Journal of Regional Studies [Pskovski regionologicheski zhurnal]. 2022. Vol. 18. N 1. P. 35–55 (in Rus).
7. Mitrofanova I. V., Sushchii S. Ya. Russians in Ukraine: geodemographic results of the postSoviet period and medium-term prospects // Sociological Research [Sociologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2017. N 8 (401). P. 45–58 (in Rus).
8. Sokolov A. S. Modern language situation in Belarus and its dynamics in the post-Soviet period // Geopolitics and ecogeodynamics of regions [Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov]. 2020. Vol. 6 (16). Iss. 4. P. 66–82 (in Rus).
9. Sokolov A. S. Regional aspects of the dynamics of the use of the Russian language by the population of Belarus in 2009–2019 // Demographic review [Demografcheskoe obozrenie]. 2021. Vol. 8. N 1. P. 127–149 (in Rus).
10. Soroko E. L. Indicators for describing ethno-demographic processes // 16 April international scientifc conference on the problems of economic and social development: in 4 books / Ed. E. G. Yasin. Book 3. Moscow : HSE Publishing House. 2016. P. 328–338. (in Rus).
11. Sushchii S. Ya. Russian population of the near abroad: geodemographic dynamics of the postSoviet period // Demographic review [Demografcheskoe obozrenie]. 2020. Vol. 7. N 2. P. 6–30 (in Rus).
12. Tarkhov S. A. Results of the 2001 Ukrainian census // Fourth Socratic Readings in Geography. Scientifc theories and geographical reality [Nauchnye teorii i geografcheskaya realnost]. Moscow : Eslan. 2004. P. 144–164 (in Rus).
13. Hmelko V. E. Linguo-ethnic structure of Ukraine: regional peculiarities and tendencies of changes during the years of independence // Scientifc notes of NaUKMA. Sociological Sciences [Nauchnye zapiski NaUKMA. Sociologicheskie nauki]. 2004. Vol. 32. P. 3–15 (in Rus).
14. Ethnocultural transformation of the post-Soviet space: factors, trends, prospects / N. V. Danilkina, I. V. Ermolin, I. A. Ivanov [and others]. Pskov : Pskov State University, 2022. 344 p.
15. Booth H. Demographic Forecasting: 1980 to 2005 // Int. J. of Forecasting. 2006. N 3 (18). P. 547–581.
16. Ivanchenko V. S., Chimiris Е. S. Russian language in the Post-Soviet space as a factor of politics // Political Science Issues. 2020. Vol. 10. N 3 (42–44). P. 305–315.
17. Mägi K., van Ham M., Leetmaa K., Tammaru T. The neighbourhood context and changes in self-reported ethnic identity // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2020. N 46 (1). P. 277–296.
18. Orlov A. Y. The Technique of Ethnogeodemographic Research // Geography and Natural Resources. 2009. Vol. 30. N 1. P. 73–78.
19. Oskolkov P. V. Ethnicity and politics: terminological debates and nodal points of intersection // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92. N 2. P. S155–S160.
20. Platt L. Is there assimilation in minority groups’ national, ethnic and religious identity? // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2014. N 37 (1). P. 46–70.
21. Waters C. M. Immigration, intermarriage, and the challenges of measuring racial/ethnic identities // American Journal of Public Health. 2000. N 90 (11). P. 1735–1737.
22. Wilson T. A multistate model for projecting regional populations by Indigenous status: an application to the Northern Territory, Australia // Environment and Planning. 2009. N 41 (1). P. 230–249
Review
For citations:
Manakov A.G., Terenina N.K. The Republic of Belarus and Ukraine: Contrasts of Ethnic and Linguistic Identity. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(10):145-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-10-145-155
Views:
291
Email this article 