Organization of Expert Activity on Digital Network Platforms
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-11-55-66
Abstract
Currently, expert-analytical activity is being developed on digital network platforms as sociotechnical systems that organize algorithmized relationships between actors and actant in the field of assessing a problem situation and making decisions to resolve it. The lag in the development of expert and analytical activities in the public administration system of the region leads to a slowdown in the processes of their socio-economic development. The purpose of the presented work was to substantiate the need of the regional management system for a conceptual model of smart configuration of expert and analytical activities on digital network platforms. The author determined that such a conceptual model should be based on 1) the concept of stakeholders (E. Freeman), 2) the critical heuristics of designing social systems (V. Ulrich), 3) the concept of epistemic communities (P. Haas). Its need is determined by three main points: 1) identifying the problematic field of requests and the degree of demand for conducting a social and professional examination with the involvement of representatives of interested parties; 2) digitalization processes that lead to the formation of digital network platforms as the technological basis for public management of new quality and 3) the construction of the concept of smart configuration as its content and technological basis. This model is based on smart configuring, the concept of using an artificial intelligence system to organize optimization models for developing options for socially significant management decisions, taking into account the consolidation of interests and the participation of all stakeholders. Smart configuration enables dialogue and collaboration between key stakeholders. To do this, you need to create a smart application (intelligent relational network configurator).
About the Author
V. V. Zotov
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vitaly V. Zotov, Doctor of Science (Sociology), Professor, Professor of Department of Philosophy, Educational and Scientific Center for Humanities and Social Sciences
Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region
References
1. Armashova-Telnik G. S. The problem of making managerial decisions in the context of digitalization of the Russian economy // Innovative science [Innovatsionnaya nauka.]. 2020. N 4. P. 96–100 (In Rus).
2. Babintsev V. P., Nadutkina I. E., Sapryka V. A. Expert community as a subject of civil participation in a region // Vlast’. 2015. Vol. 22. N 7. P. 5–9 (In Rus).
3. Bogomolov A. V., Klimov R. S. Automation of information processing during collective network expert examinations // Automation. Modern Technologies [Avtomatizatsiya. Sovremennye tekhnologii]. 2017. Vol. 71. N 11. P. 509–512 (In Rus).
4. Vasilenko L. A., Zotov V. V., Zakharova S. A. Social media potential for developing participatory governance // RUDN Journal of Sociology [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Sotsiologiya]. 2020. Vol. 20. N 4. P. 864–876. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-864-876 (In Rus).
5. Vasilenko L. A., Vronskaya M. I. Interaction of public authorities and local self-government with civil society institutions. M. : Limited Liability Company “Prospect”, 2010. 290 p. (In Rus).
6. Dolzhenko R. A., Dolzhenko S. B. Development of professional communities and their role in solving socioeconomic problems // Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics” [Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Ser.: Ekonomika]. 2019. Vol. 17. N 3. P. 78–87. DOI: 10.25513/1812-3988.2019.17(3).78-87 (In Rus).
7. Zotov V. V. Configuring as a Management Tool for Capitalization in Social Networks // Communicology [Kommunikologiya]. 2019. Vol. 7. N 4. P. 15–31. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-4-15-31 (In Rus).
8. Kachalov R. M. The inauguration meeting of the joint research and advisory Council of Moscow city government and Russian academy of sciences // Russian Management Journal [Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta]. 2004. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 169–172 (In Rus).
9. Kvasha V. A., Burykin A. D. Expert network community: its purpose and formation process // Institutional foundations of the economy of advanced development: materials of the international scientific and practical / ed. L. G. Batrakova. Yaroslavl : YSPU named after K. D. Ushinsky, 2019. P. 197–202 (In Rus).
10. Knyazev Yu.P. Expert vs public evaluation of civil servant involving social media // Communicology [Kommunikologiya]. 2019. Vol. 7. N 4. P. 107–116. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-4-107-116 (In Rus).
11. Mamitova N. V. Expertise as an interdisciplinary institution // State legal research: Scientific and educational yearbook [Gosudarstvenno-pravovye issledovaniya: Nauchno-obrazovatel’nyy yezhegodnik]. 2020. Is. 3. P. 101–106 (In Rus).
12. Perinov S. B. Modern trends in the theory and practice of educational expertise // Transbaikal State University Journal [Vestnik Zabaikal’skogo universiteta]. 2013. N 9. P. 52–57 (In Rus).
13. Predictive social design: theoretical, methodological and methodological problems //: ed. T. M. Dridze. M. : Nauka, 1994. 302 p. (In Rus).
14. Smorgunov L. V., Ignatiyeva O. A., Bykov I. A., Kondratenko K. S., Baryshkin A. G. Public communication between citizens and public authorities: forming of judments on digital platforms // Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science [Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya]. 2021. Vol. 15. N 2. P. 156–172. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2021-2-156-172 (In Rus).
15. Smorgunov L. V. Participatory controllability and digitalization // Management of the development of large-scale systems MLSD’2019: Proceedings of the twelfth international conference: Scientific electronic edition, Moscow, October 01–03, 2019 / eds. S. N. Vasilyeva, A. D. Tsvirkun. M. : Institute of Management Problems named after V. A. Trapeznikova RAN. 2019. P. 1270–1273. DOI: 10.25728/mlsd.2019.1.1270 (In Rus).
16. Tambovtsev V. L. Expertise as an institution: functions and conditions for effectiveness and efficiency // Science. Innovation. Education [Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie]. 2007. Vol. 2. N 2. P. 17–29 (In Rus).
17. Tobin D. S. Network Expert-Analytical Platform as a Tool Decision Support Distributed Environments // Vestnik NSUEM [Vestnik NGUEU]. 2020. N 3. P. 231–240 (In Rus).
18. Shipovalova L. V., Chernysheva L. A., Gizatullina E. G. Digital governance technologies in action, or On the activity of citizens around the platform “Active citizen” // Sociology of science and technology [Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii]. 2021. Vol. 12. N 1. P. 71–87. DOI: 10.24411/2079-0910-2021-11005 (In Rus).
19. Cate F. H. Government data mining: the need for a legal framework // Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review. 2008. Vol. 43. N 2. P. 435–489.
20. Freeman R. E. Stakeholder Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA : Pitman Publishing, 1984. 276 p.
21. Haas P. M. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination // International Organization. Vol. 46. N 1. 1992. P. 1–35.
22. Ulrich W. Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Bern, Switzerland, and Stuttgart, Germany: Paul Haupt, 1983. 504 p.
Review
For citations:
Zotov V.V. Organization of Expert Activity on Digital Network Platforms. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(11):55-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-11-55-66
Views:
296
Email this article 