Sociocultural Integration of Russian Society under the Influence of the Ukrainian Crisis of 2013–2022 and the Identity Policy’s Purposes

The purpose of the article is to establish changes in the degree of integration of Russian society under the influence of the Ukrainian crisis of 2013–2022, to argue proposals for improving the effectiveness of the identity policy of the Russian Federation. The topic was considered at the federal and macro-regional (South of Russia) levels. The research methodology is social constructivism in terms of the spheres of national identity and interethnic relations. Methods of analysis — questionnaire survey, secondary analysis of the results of sociological surveys. The results of the study substantiate a new understanding of the socio-cultural integration of a multi-ethnic society. Changes in the perceptions of Russians during 2000–2021 about the goals of social development and basic values, about the relationship between the state and society, about the desirable goals of the state policy of identity are revealed. These changes are developing in the direction of conservative values, recognition of the independence of Russian society from the West, but paradoxically combined with the preservation of a number of liberal values and orientations. Differences in the state of identity between the age and territorial groups of Russian society are established. In this context, the ideas of the residents of the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, as well as the Republics of Donbass about their identity are important, confirming the increased conservatism and Russiancentricity in comparison with the metropolitan megacities of Russia. Ukraine as such is on the periphery of the geopolitical picture of the world of Russians, at the same time, it acts as a contrasting “Other” — a negative example of the consequences of choosing the Western path of development. The 2022 special military operation became a catalyst for value changes that have been brewing in Russia for a long period. Russian Identity Politics Influenced by the Ukrainian Crisis of 2013–2022 becomes more than before, aimed at the formation of the Russian multiethnic nation, the strengthening and integration of the state, the education of a positive perception of history. At the same time, these changes are not sufficiently fixed in the educational, symbolic and informational policy of the Russian Federation, new trends contradict the former course towards the socio-cultural integration of Russia into the globalized world through westernization. The author argues proposals for reforming the state identity policy of the Russian Federation.

1. Achkasov V. A. Russian dilemma: empire or nation-state. M. : Yurayt Publ., 2019 (in Rus).

2. Baranov A. V., Dontsova M. V., Chigrin V. A. Orientations and attitudes of perception of interethnic and interfaith relations by working youth of the Kuban and Crimea // Historical and socioeducational thought [Istoricheskaja i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naja mysl’]. 2018. Vol. 10. N 5. P. 2. P. 41–51 (in Rus).

3. Brodovskaya E. V., Irkhin A. A., Kanakh A. M., Karzubov D. N. at al. Interethnic and interreligious harmony in the student environment of the Crimea and Sevastopol: monitoring and analysis of the level of development. Sevastopol : Sevastopol State University, 2019 (in Rus).

4. Byzov L. G. Ukrainian Crisis in the Context of Socio-Political and Socio-Cultural Processes Forming the Mass Consciousness of Russians // Sociological Science and Social Practice [Sotsiologicheskaja nauka i sotsial’naja praktika]. 2015. N 1 (9). P. 52–77 (in Rus).

5. Gorshkov M.K. On the harmonization of interethnic relations in post-reform Russia: a contextual approach // Humanitarian of the South of Russia [Gumanitarij Juga Rossii]. 2017. Vol. 6. N 2. P. 14–25 (in Rus).

6. Drobizheva L. M. Russian Identity: Discussions in the Political Space and the Dynamics of Mass Consciousness // Polis. Political studies [Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija]. 2018. N 5. P. 100–115 (in Rus).

7. Evgenyeva T. V., Smulkina N. V., Tsymbal I. A. The place of Russia in the world in the perception of ordinary citizens: an identification dimension // Polis. Political studies [Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija]. 2020. N 4. P. 181–191 (in Rus).

8. Konstantinova L. V. The integration potential of society: the experience of conceptualization // Sociological researches [Sociologicheskie issledovanija]. 2019. N 8. P. 19–29 (in Rus).

9. Conflict and integration factors in the development of the human potential of the South of Russia in the context of new geopolitical challenges / I. V. Yurchenko, A. V. Baranov, N. N. Yurchenko, M.V. Dontsovа. Krasnodar : Kuban State University, 2019 (in Rus).

10. Kulbachevskaya O. V. Ethno-social situation and inter-ethnic relations in the Crimea // Bulletin of Anthropology [Vestnik antropologii]. 2019. N 4 (48). P. 114–115 (in Rus).

11. Lubsky A. V., Posukhova O. Yu. Nation-building projects and models of national integration in Russia // Power [Vlast’]. 2016. Vol. 24. N 8. P. 39–48 (in Rus).

12. Mastikova N.S. Values of Russians and Residents of European Leading Countries (according to the European Social Survey) // Public opinion monitoring: economic and social changes [Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny]. 2013. N 6 (118). P. 148–156 (in Rus).

13. Milyukova T. V. Tension in the interethnic friendship of representatives of the Russian and Crimean Tatar ethnic groups in the Crimea // Psychology and Pedagogy in the Crimea: ways of development [Psihologija i pedagogika v Krymu: puti razvitija]. 2020. N 1. P. 271–274 (in Rus).

14. Minenkov G. Ya. Identity politics from the point of view of modern social theory // Political science: Identity as a factor of politics and the subject of political science. M. : Aspect Press, 2005. P. 21–38 (in Rus).

15. Muratova E.S., Dyulberova L. Ya., Apselyamova A. I. Crimean Tatars in the context of the transformation of the political space. Simferopol : IT ARIAL, 2020 (in Rus).

16. Mchedlova M. M., Kazarinova D.B. Identity politics: competition of new theoretical meanings and political strategies // Political Science [Politicheskaja nauka]. 2020. N 4. P. 13–35 (in Rus).

17. All-Russian civil identity in the South of Russia. Analysis of measures and proposals for the Southern Federal District and the North Caucasus: analytical report / ed. I. I. Gorlovа. M. : Heritage Institute, 2020 (in Rus).

18. Pantin V. I. Prospects for the socio-political and economic integration of Russia // Reforming Russia [Rossija reformirujushhajasja]. 2013. N 12. P. 400–408 (in Rus).

19. Popov M. E. Politics of socio-cultural integration: main theoretical approaches // Polis. Political studies [Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija]. 2017. N 1. Р. 99–115 (in Rus).

20. Popova O. V. On unresolved problems of the theory of state policy of identity in Russian political science // Political Science [Politicheskaja nauka]. 2020. N 4. P. 86–110 (in Rus).

21. Russian identity and identity politics: construction and de-construction / V. A. Avksentiev, B. V. Aksyumov, V. A. Vasilchenko, G.S. Denisov. Stavropol : North Caucasian Federal University, 2018 (in Rus).

22. Savin S. D., Kasabutskaya M.S. National Russian values in the context of the formation of a collective identity // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sociologija]. 2019. Vol. 12. Is. 1. P. 82–97 (in Rus).

23. Savchenko I. A. A multi-ethnic community in search of an integration route. M. : ITS RIOR; INFRA-M, 2019 (in Rus).

24. Semenenko I.S. Identity politics in the conditions of ethno-cultural diversity: a new agenda // Identity: personality, society, politics. M. : Ves Mir, 2017. Р. 102–113 (in Rus).

25. Sikevich Z. V. Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians: together or apart? (dynamics of representations of Petersburgers, 2006–2016) // Sociological researches [Sociologicheskie issledovanija]. 2017. N 7. P. 88–98 (in Rus).

26. Tishkov V.A. Nation, nationalism and nation-building // Russia in global politics [Rossija v global’noj politike]. 2021. Vol. 19. N 2 (in Rus).

27. Cherkashin K. V. Residents of Donetsk are increasingly self-identifying as Russians. Dynamics of ethnic self-identification of Donbass residents (2014–2016) [Electronic source]. URL: https://regnum.ru/news/society/2240754.html (accessed: 20.04.2022) (in Rus).

28. Yakovlev A. N. Cartographic study of the dynamics of ethno-confessional contradictions in the Crimea // Geopolitics and ecogeodynamics of regions [Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov]. 2020. Vol. 6 (16). Is. 3. Р. 316–318 (in Rus).

29. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. New York : Anchor Books: A Division of Random House, Inc., 1966.

30. Brewer P.R., Gross K., Aday S., Wilnat L. International Trust and Public Opinion about World Affairs // American Journal of Political Science. 2004. Vol. 48. N 1. Р. 93–109.

31. Castells M. The Power of Identity. Cambridge : John Wiley & Sons, 1997.

32. Fearon J., Laitin D. Explaining Interethnic Cooperation // The American Political Science Review. 1996. Vol. 90. N 4. P. 57–74.

33. Gillin J. P. Some Principles of Sociocultural Integration // Current Anthropology. 1971. Vol. 12. N 1. Р. 63–71.

34. Habermas J. Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews. London : Verso, 1986.

35. Hobsbaum E. J. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1992.

36. Huntington S.P. Who are We?: Challenges of American National Identity. New York : Simon & Schuster, 2005.

37. Kolsto P. Political Construction Sites: Nation Building in Russia and the Post-Soviet States. New York : Routledge, 2018.

38. Makarychev А., Yatsyk А. Sovereignty and Russian National Identity-Making: The Biopolitical Dimension // Russia Before and After Crimea: Nationalism and Identity, 2010–17. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2018. Р. 93–118.

39. McCrone D., Bechhofer F. Understanding National Identity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2015.

40. Parsons Т. The Social System. London : Routledge, 1991.

41. Samiul Parvez А., Sarwar Uddin A., Ikramul H. Transformation of Sociocultural Integration Policy and Inherent Political Theories in the United Kingdom: A Way Forward // SAGE Open. 2021. April — June. P. 1–14 [Electronic source]. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440211007461 (accessed: 20.06.2022).

42. Shils E. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1975.

43. Steward J.H. Levels of Sociocultural Integration: An Operational Concept // Journal of Anthropological Research. 1986. Vol. 42. N 3. Р. 337–353.

44. Weiner S., Stone Tatum D. Rethinking Identity in Political Science // Political Studies Review. London, 2020. Vol. 19, Is. 3. P. 464–481.