Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Corporate Culture in the Formation of the Value and Information Space of the City and the Company

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-5-83-94

Abstract

Rulers and citizens have been engaged in the formation of the popularity of the territory since ancient times. Everyone was well aware of the unique healing springs, mud hospitals, resorts, temples and monasteries, trading cities to which tourists, merchants, and pilgrims aspired. In fact, these were the first territorial brands that bring territories and the population living on them a good income and distinguish them from a number of other territories. The formation of cultural brands of territories is associated with a unique advantage of the territory or a unique craft. Today, the corporate culture of those companies that conduct their activities can serve as an additional potential for a territorial brand.
The purpose of the article is to analyze the possibilities of the corporate culture of the organization in the development and formation of the brand of the territory through the influence on the worldview of employees living in this territory. As part of the research, we used methods of content analysis of mass media, content analysis of documents on Eurochem’s corporate culture, analysis of sources defining the conceptual field of the city’s brand formation.
As a result, we described the possibilities of corporate culture in the formation of the brand of the territory, the inclusion of the values of corporate culture in the territorial brand and the worldview of the residents of the city.
Today, corporate culture means a system of material and spiritual values, norms of behavior and interaction inherent in this organization, reflecting its individuality. But the culture of the country is also a system in which there are material and spiritual values, norms of behavior and interaction. Corporate culture, in order to contribute to the development of culture in the country, should be of value to its inhabitants, serve the purpose of human preservation and be a protective mechanism.
As a result, we have recorded that recently corporate values differ from those that exist in this territory, national customs and cultural traditions are not taken into account at all by multinational companies. At the same time, an employee of the company, being a citizen of the state, is brought up in the axiological space not of the company, but of the state. The norms of the law of the national State are applicable to it. We have considered the possibility to talk about the ideology of corporate culture as a whole, as part of the culture of the state, corporate culture as one of the forms of manifestation of the culture of society. 

About the Authors

N. V. Grishanin
State Academic University of Humanities; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation

Nikita V. Grishanin, PhD, Senior Researcher; Head of the Master’s program “Consulting and Reputation Management in Advertising and Public Relations”

St. Petersburg



Ya. V. Minevich
State Academic University of Humanities; Moscow State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation

Yakov V. Minevich, PhD, Senior Researcher; Head of the Department of Advertising and Public Relations

Moscow

 



A. S. Merkusheva
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation

Alexandra S. Merkusheva, Bachelor

St. Petersburg



References

1. Belskikh I. E. Multivariate image of the territory in the domestic and foreign markets of the global world // Regional economy: theory and practice [Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika]. 2014. N 29 (356). P. 2–10. EDN SIMWHR (in Rus).

2. Gaponenko A. L., Pankrukhin A. P. Strategic management : textbook. M. : Publishing house “OMEGA L”, 2008 (in Rus).

3. Grishanin N. V. Text, symbol and myth in the semiotic analysis of urban culture // News of higher educational institutions. Problems of printing and publishing [ Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Problemy poligrafii i izdatel’skogo dela]. 2007. N 1. P. 76–78. EDN PKMFXJ (in Rus).

4. Daft R. L. Management. 2nd ed. SPb. : Piter, 2002. 862 p. (in Rus).

5. Dobroshtan V. M. Axiological foundations of a person’s worldview. SPb. : Saint Petersburg State University of Technology and Design, 2006. 136 p. (in Rus).

6. Dobroshtan V. M. Does it make sense to look for the meaning of life? (Article 2. The choice of life alternatives) // Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Ser. 3: Economic, Humanitarian and Social Sciences [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tekhnologii i dizaina. Seriya 3: Ekonomicheskie, gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki]. 2010. N. 2. P. 52–55. EDN NBJVSH (in Rus).

7. Lotman Yu. M. Symbol in the system of culture. Works on sign systems. 21: A symbol in the cultural system. Tartu, 1987 (in Rus).

8. Pashkus V. Yu. Economy and culture: creative economy, state regulation and approaches to assessing the brand of the territory / V. Yu. Pashkus, A. O. Bulina // Regional economy: theory and practice [Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika]. 2014. N 35 (362). P. 39–47. EDN SNAMDX (in Rus).

9. Sokolov E. V. The concept, essence and main functions of culture : textbook. L. : Leningrad State Institute of Culture named after N. K. Krupskaya, 1989 (1990) (in Rus)

10. Tankieva T. A. Brands of the territory as a basis for promoting the region (on the example of the Tula region) / T. A. Tankieva, A. V. Korolev // Service plus [Servis plus]. 2018. Vol. 12. N 4. P. 56–69. DOI: 10.24411/2413-693X-2018-10406 (in Rus).

11. Fedotova V. G. Social state and good society // Questions of philosophy [Voprosy filosofii]. 2019. N. 11. P. 5–10. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440007344-3 (in Rus).

12. Fedotova N. G. Cultural memory of the city as a symbolic resource of the territory // Scientific notes of the Novgorod State University [Uchenye zapiski Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. 2019. N 1 (19). P. 1–4. DOI: 10.34680/068e-cp40 (in Rus).

13. Kharichev A. D. Perception of basic values, factors and structures of socio-historical development of Russia (based on research and approbation) / A. D. Kharichev, A. Y. Shutov, A. V. Polosin, E. N. Sokolova // Journal of Political Studies [Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovanii]. 2022. Vol. 6. N. 3. P. 9–19. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2022-6-3-9-19 (in Rus).

14. Chirikova A. E. Top management of city-forming enterprises and the legislature of small towns: persons matter / A. E. Chirikova, V. G. Ledyaev // Political expertise: POLITEX [Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS]. 2022. Vol. 18. N 1. P. 4–22. DOI: 10.21638/spbu23.2022.101 (in Rus).

15. Chugrov S. V. Soft attraction of Japan // Polis. Political studies [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2015. N. 6. P. 53–67. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2015.06.08. EDN UOHUVH (in Rus).

16. Yakovenko N. V. Folk art crafts as a special brand of cultural tourism in a depressed region (on the example of the Ivanovo region) // Modern problems of service and tourism [Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma]. 2015. Vol. 9. N. 4. P. 62–71. DOI: 10.12737/14533 (in Rus).

17. Aichner T. Country-of-origin marketing: A list of typical strategies with examples // Journal of Brand Management. 2014. Vol. 21. P. 81–93. 10.1057/ bm.2013.24. DOI: 10.1057/bm.2013.24.

18. Towards Effective Place Brand Management: Branding European Cities and Regions / ed. G. Ashworth, M. Kavaratzis. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010. 296 p.


Review

For citations:


Grishanin N.V., Minevich Ya.V., Merkusheva A.S. Corporate Culture in the Formation of the Value and Information Space of the City and the Company. Administrative Consulting. 2023;(5):83-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-5-83-94

Views: 380


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)