European Choice of Russian Civilization: The Imperatives of 2023
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-6-27-33
Abstract
For a long time, Russia has seen itself as a significant, specific part of European civilization. This was refused to Russia at the turn of 2008–2009. Further development took place in the context of regionalization, a systemic world crisis and an increase in contradictions between Russia and Europe. As a result, today Russia is ready to recognize its historical relationship with Europe, without any systemic obligations on this basis.
Thus, firstly, it was not Russia that left Europe, but Russia that decided to “exclude” from Europe. Secondly, for us, Shakespeare, who is forgotten in Britain, and Remarque, who was forgotten in Germany, will remain part of our identity. The lack of culture of “cancellation” has become a symbol of modern Europe, but for us this is a path to nowhere. Last. Russian civilization is larger and more complex than European: it is Eurasian civilization.
About the Authors
A. D. Khlutkov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey d. Khlutkov, Director, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
Saint Petersburg
N. M. Mezhevich
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA); Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Head of the Laboratory of Strategic Planning and Eurasian Integration; Chief Researcher, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
Saint Petersburg
Moscow
References
1. Belov V. B., Kotov A. V. Economic relations between the EU and Russia under restrictive measures // Social sciences and modernity [Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’]. 2023. N 2. P. 72–89. (in Rus).
2. Borko Yu. A. Europe-XXI: further up or further down? [Electronic resource] // European security [Evropeiskaya bezopasnost’.]. 2011. N 26 (42). URL: http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-564845.html. (in Rus).
3. Busygina I. M. Asymmetric integration in the European Union // International processes [Mezhdunarodnye protsessy]. 2007. Vol. 5, N 3 (15). P. 18–27. EDN OIDVZD. (in Rus).
4. Butorina O. V. Integration in the funk style [Electronic resource] // Russia in global politics [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/integracziya-v-stile-fank/ (in Rus).
5. Voionmaa V. Diplomatic Post. Moscow : Progress, 1984. (in Rus).
6. Guo Sh., Mezhevich N. M., Senik N. M. SCO as a format of cooperation and scoup of opportunities in Central Asia // East — West: history and modernity: Yearbook [Vostok — Zapad: istoriya i sovremennost’ : Ezhegodnik] / Ex. ed. D.V. Kuznetsov. N 2. Blagoveshchensk: Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University, 2022. P. 25–32. EDN MFETLZ. (in Rus).
7. Europe in a Crisis World: Collective Monograph / Al. A. Gromyko et al.; ex ed. Al. A. Gromyko]. Moscow : IE RAS: Publishing house “All the World”, 2022. (in Rus).
8. Segbers K. “Stitching a quilt...” // Pro et Contra. 1999. Vol. 4. N 4. P. 65–83. (in Rus).
9. Kuznetsov S. V., Mezhevich N. M. The imperative of economic integration of Russia and Europe in the context of globalization and the systemic crisis of the world economy // Quality economics [Ekonomika kachestva]. 2014. N 8. P. 77–83. (in Rus).
10. Mezhevich N. M. Borders in the modern world: new qualities in the context of globalization // Pskov Regional Journal [Pskovskii regionologicheskii zhurnal]. 2006. N 3. P. 3–13. EDN NUHRDJ. (in Rus).
11. Mezhevich N. M. On the question of verifying the concept of “Path Dependence” for the postSoviet space in the light of thirty years of intuitive practices // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2020. N 5 (137). P. 95–101. EDN FXIMKK. (in Rus).
12. Mullerson R. Why hatred of Russia harms the world community [Electronic resource] // Russia in global politics [Rossiya v global’noi politik]. URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Rusofobiya-kak-promyvka-mozgov-17899. (in Rus).
13. Russia — European Union: partnership opportunities / I.M. Busygin, etc.; Chief Editor I. S. Ivanov; Russian Council on International Affairs. Moscow : Spetskniga, 2013. (in Rus).
14. Urbanovich Ya. How to survive in a sanitary cordon? [Electronic resource]. URL: https://site-298132.mozfiles.com/files/298132/janis_urbanovic_2014_october_kordon_ru.pdf (in Rus).
15. Von Mises L. Liberalism. Moscow : Economics, 2001. (in Rus).
16. Fawcett L. Regionalism in historical perspective // Regionalism in world politics. Ed. by Fawcett L. and Hurell A. Oxford University Press, 1995. (in Rus).
17. Shamakhov V. A., Mezhevich N. M. On European experience in Eurasian integration // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2020. N 3(135). P. 47–53. EDN CYUEZF. (in Rus).
18. Shapiro I. Flight from reality in the humanities / translation from English D. Uzlaner. Moscow : Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2011. (in Rus).
19. Alexander J. The Civil Sphere N. Y. Oxford University Press, 2006.
Review
For citations:
Khlutkov A.D., Mezhevich N.M. European Choice of Russian Civilization: The Imperatives of 2023. Administrative Consulting. 2023;(6):27-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-6-27-33
Views:
335
Email this article 