Engagement of European Countries in the Implementation of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy (Part 1)

Globalization has contributed to the development of economic relations between Europe and the Indo-Pacific. However, after 2011 they were influenced by the American “pivot to Asia” and the shift of US attention from countering international terrorism to rivalry with the “revisionist” powers — Russia and China. In 2019, with the adoption of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy, China became their main regional rival. The rivalry with him provided for the Americans to unite their Asian allies in a network of managed formal alliances, as well as to connect Great Britain and France to solving strategic tasks. On February 11, 2022, a new Indo-Pacific strategy of the United States appeared. This document emphasized the strategic value and increasing role of Great Britain, France, the EU and NATO in Indo-Pacific and set the task of building bridges between the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic regions. The main role in its solution was assigned to AUKUS, a trilateral military alliance of the United States, Great Britain and Australia, created on September 15, 2021. At about the same time, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the European Union approved their own strategies in Indo-Pacific. They had in common an unwillingness to see China as the main opponent in the context of the US-Chinese rivalry. At the same time, the documents did not indicate that Europe was equidistant from global rivals. On the one hand, being part of the collective West, the EU demonstrated its support to America, on the other, being the most important economic partner of the Celestial Empire, it refused to see it as an existential threat to its security. Against this background, a similar British document published in March 2021 stood out, characterized by a hostile attitude towards China. However, significant differences in the strategies of European countries were offset by their membership in NATO. At the Alliance summit in Madrid in June 2022 the Europeans, together with other allies, proclaimed a strategic course for “systemic rivalry” with the PRC in the context of the interconnection of the security of the Euro-Atlantic and the development of the situation in the Indo-Pacific. With the signing of the NATO-EU joint declaration in Brussels on January 10, 2023, there was a further rapprochement of the two Western structures on an anti-Chinese basis, as well as the complete subordination of Europe to the interests of American global policy.

1. Batyuk V. I. Indo-Pacific strategy of the USA and Eurasia // Actual problems of Europe. 2021. N 1 (109). P. 135–153 (in Rus).

2. Batyuk V. I. USA — China: strategic balance // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. International relations. 2022. Vol. 15. Is. 4. P. 390–404 (in Rus).

3. Vasiliev L. E. Southeast Asia: USA and China from rivalry to confrontation // China in World and regional politics. History and modernity. 2012. Vol. 17. N 17. P. 87–99 (in Rus).

4. Vasiliev L. E. The Indo-Pacific strategy of the USA and some features of solving the problems of its implementation // Security in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of the Indo-Pacific strategy of the USA / ed.-comp. T. M. Mamakhatov. M. : Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022. P. 71–87 (in Rus).

5. Voloshina A. V. Northeast Asia in the modern foreign policy strategy of China // Problems of the Far East. 2015. N 6. P. 12–24 (in Rus).

6. Garin A. Updated Indo-Pacific strategy of France: analysis of key provisions // South-East Asia: actual problems of development. 2021. Vol. IV. N 4 (53). P. 67–76 (in Rus).

7. Degterev D. A., Ramich M. S., Tsvyk A. V. USA — CHINA: “power transit” and contours of “conflict bipolarity” // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations. 2021. Vol. 21. N 2. P. 210–231 (in Rus).

8. The European Union and the People’s Republic of China: (not) a strategic partnership? Workbook N 65 / 2022 / [V. B. Kashin, S. A. Shein, Yu. Yu. Melnikova, L. V. Krasikova et al; ed. E. O. Karpinskaya, K. A. Kuzmina, Yu.Yu. Melnikova, I. A. Tsymbal]; Russian Council for International Affairs (INF). M. : NP INF, 2022. 40 p. (in Rus).

9. Efremenko D. V. The double trap of Thucydides. The presidency of Donald Trump and the new bipolarity // Russia in Global Politics [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. 2020. Vol. 18. N 4 (104). Il / August. P. 126–147 (in Rus).

10. Zainullin T. R. U. S. strategy in the Indo-Pacific region and relations with China // Manuscript. 2021. Vol. 14. Is. 12. P. 2633–2637 (in Rus).

11. Ivanov O. P. Military dimension of the Indo-Pacific strategy of the USA // Observer. 2020. N 7 (366). P. 39–52 (in Rus).

12. Koldunova E. V. Dilemmas and contradictions of trans-regional relations of ASEAN with the EU, USA and Russia //Actual problems of Europe. 2020. N 1 (105). P. 136–154 (in Rus).

13. Kuleshova N. S., Zhang Ch. The Taiwan question in the context of the Indo-Pacific strategy of the USA // Observer. 2022. N 7–8 (390–391). P. 22–35 (in Rus).

14. Kramnik I. A. Australia and all-all-all // Russia in global politics. 2021. September 21 [Electronic source]. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/avstraliya-i-vse-vse-vse / (accessed: 04.25.2023) (in Rus).

15. Leonova O. G. Influence of the AUCUS strategic partnership on the geopolitical situation in the Indo-Pacific region // Bulletin of International Organizations. 2022. Vol. 17. N 3. P. 194–211 (in Rus).

16. Lokshin G. M. Strategic cooperation of China with Russia in the South China Sea // South-East Asia: actual problems of development. 2019. T. I. N 2 (43). P. 54–73 (in Rus).

17. Luzyanin S. G. China — USA: model 2023. “Controlled conflict” or global split? // Asia and Africa today. 2023. N 2. P. 5–13 (in Rus).

18. Lukin A. V. American Chinese rivalry in the Asia-Pacific region: declarations and reality // Russia in Global Politics]. 2023. Vol. 21. N 1 (119). February. P. 118–137 (in Rus).

19. Lukin A. L. Alliances of the USA in the Asia-Pacific region and counter-China // At the map of the Pacific Ocean [U karty Tikhogo okeana]. 2016. N 42 (240). P. 24–27 (in Rus).

20. Lukin A. L., Korotich S. A. Between Washington and Beijing: what awaits the Asia-Pacific alliances of the United States? // World Economy and International Relations. 2017. Vol. 61. N 4. P. 5–15 (in Rus).

21. Martynova E. S. Cooperation between Russia and China: What is the threat of ASEAN? // Asia and Africa today. 2014. N 2 (679). P. 4–8 (in Rus).

22. Melnikova Yu.Yu. EU strategy in the Indo-Pacific region: internal drivers and the factor of the PRC // Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2022. Vol. 12. N 2. P. 31–37 (in Rus).

23. Mikhnevich S. V. “We dream together”: The economic dimension of the “smart power” of the PRC in Southeast Asia // Bulletin of International Organizations. 2018. Vol. 13. N 4. P. 237–255 (in Rus).

24. Morozov Yu. V. D. Trump’s Indo-Pacific strategy as a threat to the interests of China and Russia in the Asia-Pacific region // China in World and regional politics. History and modernity. Issue XXIII / ed.-comp. E. I. Safronova. M. : IDV RAS, 2018. P. 107–120 (in Rus).

25. Mosyakov D. V. Familiarization with the contents of the East China Sea as a conclusion to Vietnam and the ASEAN country // South-East Asia: actual problems of education. 2020. Vol. I. N 1 (46). P. 7–12 (in Rus).

26. Mosyakov D. V. The new paramilitary bloc — new threats to peace and security in Asia // SouthEast Asia: actual problems of development. 2021. Vol. III. N 3 (52). P. 5–17 (in Rus).

27. Novoseltsev S. V., Ryzhov I. V. US foreign policy priorities in the Asia-Pacific region: the impact of the concepts of “turning to Asia” and “America first” on the situation in the South China Sea // Conflictology / Nota Bene. 2021. N 4. P. 71–80 (in Rus).

28. Ponka T. I., Kuklin N. S., Dubrovsky I. R. The China–Vietnam–India format in the South China Sea in the context of regional security // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Universal History. 2020. Vol. 12. N 4. P. 354–371 (in Rus).

29. Prikhodko O. V. USA and IE. In AT: coordinated policy or product competition? // Observer. 2015. N 5 (304). May. P. 15–34 (in Rus).

30. Starkin S. V., Ryzhov I. V. The strategic “turn” of the USA in Asia: the evolution of approaches // World Economy and International Relations. 2014. N 10. P. 49–56 (in Rus).

31. Suchkov M. A. Containment infrastructure: “flexible alliances” of the USA in Asia // Russia in global politics. 2021. October 1 [Electronic source]. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/infrastruktura-sderzhivaniya-ssha (accessed: 04.25.2023) (in Rus).

32. Chikhachev A., Gulyaev E. Strategies of France and Germany in the Indo-Pacific region // World Economy and International Relations. 2022. Vol. 66. N 5. P. 59–67 (in Rus).

33. Kliem F. EU Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region: a significant regional addition? // Panorama: A Look at Asian and European Affairs, 2022. P. 55–69 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.kas.de/documents/288143/16920728/Panorama+2021_01+Kliem.pdf (accessed: 04.25.2023).

34. Mohan G. European Strategy for the Indo-Pacific region // The Washington Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 43. Is. 4. P. 171–185.

35. Mohan G. Evaluation of the new Indo-Pacific strategy of the EU // European Policy. September 24, 2021 [Electronic source]. URL: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2021/09/24/assessingthe-eus-new-indo-pacific-strategy (accessed: 04.25.2023).

36. Odgaard L. European participation in the Indo-Pacific region: interaction between institutional and state naval diplomacy // Politics of Aasia. 2019. October. Vol. 14. N 4. P. 129–159.