Strategic Planning Documents Assessment of the Russian Far East
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-12-50-63
Abstract
In the article we analyze strategic planning documents on the Russian Far East socio-economic development. The study is based on a combination of quantitative methods (e. g. regression and correlation analysis, modeling, average method, index method, difference of differences method, factor analysis) and qualitative methods (document analysis, case study, best practice identification, classification method, SWOT analysis). We proposed an index of socio-economic development and revealed that the activation of the regulation have a multiplier effect in a generally positive impact on the Far Eastern regions development. Forecasting showed that in the medium term, the scenario of moderate growth can be considered the most likely. We developed some proposals to improve the strategic planning documents efficiency. In particular, “point” tools should be integrated to ensure a complex planning. Each planning document should provide for the possibility of statistical evaluation. It is necessary to justify the introduction of new strategic priorities, and monitoring should be carried out not only during the implementation of the document (in actu ), but also after its completion ( ex post).
About the Author
G. A. Borshchevskiy
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgy A. Borshchevskiy, Doctor of Political Sciences, Full Professor
Moscow
References
1. Aganbegyan A. G. Development of the Far East: a national program in the context of national projects // Spatial Economics [Prostranstvennaya ekonomika]. 2019. Vol. 15. N 3. P. 165–181 (in Rus).
2. Zubarevich N. V. Regions of Russia in the new economic conditions // Journal of the New Economic Association [Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii]. 2022. N 3. P. 226–234 (in Rus).
3. Leonov S. N. Preferential regimes of created local points of growth and their impact on the economy of the Far East // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast [Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz]. 2020. Vol. 13. N 3. P. 28–45 (in Rus).
4. Minakir P. A. Eastern Vector of Development: New Opportunities and Expectations // Regionalistics [Regionalistika]. 2023. Vol. 10. N 1. P. 67–73 (in Rus).
5. Antonova N. E., Lomakina N. V. Institutional innovations for the development of the East of Russia: effects of implementation in the resource region // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2020. Vol. 13. N 4. P. 442–452.
6. Gurkov I., Kokorina A., Saidov Z. Russian Territories of Outrunning Development in Mono Cities: Current and Prospective Opportunities for Foreign Investment into Manufacturing // Journal of East-West Business. 2020. Vol. 26. N 4. P. 365–390.
7. Hirofumi A. New instruments Attracting investment into the Russian Far East: preliminary assessment // Spatial Economics. 2019. Vol. 15. N 1. P. 157–169.
8. Min J., Kang B. Promoting New Growth: ‘Advanced Special Economic Zones’ in the Russian Far East // Russia’s Turn to the East: Domestic Policymaking and Regional Cooperation / ed. H. Blakkisrud, E. W. Rowe. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. P. 51–74.
9. Parwez S. A. Review of Special Economic Zone Led to Detrimental Implications: An Indian Experience // Emerging Economy Studies. 2020. Vol. 6. N 2. P. 179–190.
10. Walker R. M., Lee M. J., James O., Ho S. M. Y. Analyzing the complexity of performance information use: experiments with stakeholders to Disaggregate dimensions of performance, data sources, and data types // Public Administration Review. 2018. Vol. 78. N 1. P. 1–12.
Review
For citations:
Borshchevskiy G.A. Strategic Planning Documents Assessment of the Russian Far East. Administrative Consulting. 2023;(12):50-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-12-50-63
Views:
331
Email this article 