Relevance of Extra-Institutional Modes of Politicisation Young People
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-12-158-166
Abstract
This article examines extra-institutional mechanisms of youth politicisation. The aim of this article is to analyse the relevance of extra-institutional mechanisms of youth involvement in political processes. Methods. The method of scientific literature analysis was used to achieve the set goal. Results. The main mechanisms of politicisation are considered, a theoretical review of institutions and their role in political life is given. A description of extra-institutional formats of politicisation is given. Conclusions. The study draws conclusions about the relevance of extra-institutional modes of youth politicisation in modern conditions and shows their advantage over institutional ones. In addition, the paper argues that the use of online platforms is an important way to reach young people and engage them in political processes. The paper is intended for professionals and organisations involved in youth policy.
About the Author
V. O. Vekshin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav o . Vekshin , Postgraduate Student of the Faculty of Public and Municipal Administration, training area “Political Institutions, Processes and Technologies”
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Abramov A. V., Fedorchenko S. N. Politicization of modern Russian society and patriotism of citizens: content analysis of social networks // Bulletin of Omsk University. The series “Historical Sciences” [Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoricheskie nauki»]. 2016. N 1. P. 13–19 (in Rus).
2. Anichkina V. V. Factors of formation of political culture of youth // Questions of political science [Voprosy politologii]. 2021. Vol. 11. N 5. P. 56–68 (in Rus).
3. Anonishnev V. M. Social structure, social institutions and processes: monograph. M. : LLC SIC “Engineer”, 2013 (in Rus).
4. Astafyeva L. V. The role of new media in the electoral campaigns of the candidates for the president of Russia 2018: a comparative analysis / L. V. Astafyeva, S. Y. Volkov // Electronic periodical for students and postgraduates “Ogarev-online”. 2020. N 7. P. 1–8 [Electronic source]. URL: https://journal.mrsu.ru/arts/rol-novyx-media-v-izbiratelnyx-kampaniyax-kandidatov-v-prezidenty-rf-2018-goda-sravnitelnyj-analiz (accessed: 15.09.2023) (In Rus).
5. Brodovskaya E. V., Huang T. Digital generation: civil mobilization and political protest of Russian youth // Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social changes [Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny]. 2019. N 5. P. 3–18 (in Rus).
6. Dubina A. S. Political and legal values of modern youth of the Penza region // Dynamics of modern society: transformation of life worlds and structures: Materials of the International scientific and practical online conference. Volgograd, December 17–18, 2020 / ed. N. A. Skobelina. Volgograd : Volgograd State University, 2021. P. 35–41 (in Rus).
7. Zhabchik S. V. The influence of politics on youth / S. V. Zhabchik, S. I. Khusht // Socio-humanitarian bulletin: All-Russian collection of scientific papers / ed. chief N. P. Kuruskanova. Is. 23. Krasnodar : Krasnodar Center for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018. P. 67–68 (in Rus).
8. Komarova M. S. Participation of youth in the political process of Russian society: search for priorities // State and municipal Administration. Scientific notes of SKAGGS [Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS]. 2016. N 2. P. 279–284 (in Rus).
9. Milorava A. R. Political activity of Russian youth at the present stage // Young scientist [Molodoi uchenyi]. 2017. N 14. P. 572–573 (in Rus).
10. Youth political leadership in the value-cognitive space of the North-Western and South Siberian regions of Russia: brochure. Barnaul : Publishing House of Altai University, 2019 (in Rus).
11. Rosstat: Distribution of the population by age groups [Electronic source]. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781 (accessed: 20.02.2023) (in Rus).
12. Rozhkova L. V., Vlazneva S. A., Dubina A. S. Political orientations and electoral activity of modern youth. Social activity of youth as a necessary condition for the development of society: mater. international scientific and practical conf. St. Petersburg, November 21–23, 2019 / ed. G. V. Kovaleva. SPb. : FGBOUVO “SPbGUPTD”. 2019. P. 369–374 (in Rus).
13. Simonova I. A. Between DIY and institutions: socio-philosophical analysis of formats // Questions of management [Voprosy upravleniya]. 2019. N 6 (61). P. 45–52 (in Rus).
14. Savel’ev A. N. Understanding the political // Russian policy of the XXI century: political non-political potential: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (23–24 April 2009). M., 2009 (in Rus).
15. Tomislav D. A. Historical and political responsibility: the coincidence of the boundaries of the problem field // Politics: Analysis. Chronicle. Forecast [Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz]. 2016. N 4 (83). P. 25–35 (in Rus).
16. Khorunzhiy S. N. Lobbying as an extra-institutional structure of public power / S. N. Khorunzhiy // Human and citizen rights and freedoms: theoretical aspects and legal practice: materials of the Annual International Scientific Conference in Memory of Professor Felix Mikhailovich Rudinsky, Moscow, April 28, 2016 / general ed. D. A. Pashentsev. M. : Concept, 2016. P. 465–467 (in Rus).
17. Engaging Young People in Open Government (A communication guide) [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.oecd.org/mena/governance/Young-people-in-OG.pdf (accessed: 02.07.2023).
18. Giddens A. Sociology. Cambridge, 1989.
19. Hanks M. Youth, voluntary-associations and political-socialization // Soc. Forces. 1981. Vol. 60. P. 211–223. DOI: 10.2307/2577941.
20. Hooghe M., Stolle D., and Stouthuysen P. Head start in politics the recruitment function of youth organizations of political parties in Belgium (Flanders) // Party Politics. 2004. Vol. 10. P. 193–212. DOI: 10.1177/1354068804040503.
21. Lane J.-E., Ersson S. The New Institutional Politics: Performance and Outcomes, London and New York : Routledge, 2000.
22. March J. G., Olsen J. P. The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life // American Political Science Review. 1984. N 78. Р. 734–749.
23. Thacker E. Networks, Swarms, Multitudes. Part One // CTheory [Electronic source]. URL: http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=422 (accessed: 06.07.2023).
24. Wolf M., Mcquitty S. Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes // AMS Review, 2011.
25. Wehr К. DIY: The Search for Control and Self-Reliance in the 21st Century // Framing 21st Century Social Issues. Routledge, 2013.
26. Zang M. S. DIY: How internationalization shifts the locus of indigenous innovation for Chinese firms // Journal of World Business. 2016. Vol. 51. N 5. P. 662–674.
Review
For citations:
Vekshin V.O. Relevance of Extra-Institutional Modes of Politicisation Young People. Administrative Consulting. 2023;(12):158-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-12-158-166
Views:
235
Email this article 