The Architecture of the Global Geo-Economics: Pre-Determination of the Crisis and the Vector of Transformations

Introduction
The dramatic nature on contemporary crisis of global political and economic architecture is determined by two factors: the deep degradation of nation-state systems of political and economic management and unfinished construction of the new system of global geo-economics relevant to the ongoing political transformations. The synergy of the two factors formed the effect of chaotization of economically important geographic and sectorial industrial environments. That factors explains the fact that the economic interdependence interrelationships that were regarded earlies as critical were dismantled so easy.
Purpose and importance
The significance of the research is emphasized by starting phases of structural transformations of the system of global politics and economics that we witness at this point taking into consideration that Russia is a part of the global system despite the special status of the country. And it is necessary to address the on-going changes and a historical process. The goal of the article is to deconstruct the underling mechanisms that US and transnational elites use to manage the global geo-economic trends through the transition to system of economic regionalization.
Methods
The article is part of the research that author conducts since 2019. The intermediate results of the study were published in several major scientific, political and discussion platforms. The taken article is based upon the generalization of the experience of the global geo-economic transformations that are reflected in the different formats of the institutionalization. The analysis involves a wide circle of analytical and experts’ assessments regarding the perspectives of development of the global economic architecture.
Results
The main scientific result of the article is to reconstruct the global geo-economic architecture that was planned for development in the period of mature America-centric globalization. The critical breakpoints that jeopardized the integrity of the global geo-economic environment are formulated. And in those breakpoints the scenario of «force geo-economics» can be employed. The variants of the post-crisis re-institutionalization in the neo-global world are outlined.
Development and discussion
The article is the means to outline for the discussion the authors’ conclusion that are based upon the reflection of the period of dismantlement of the economic system of the mature globalization. The research creates a basis for clarification of the perspective status of the geo-economic periphery and semi-periphery which becomes a vital segment of the world economy. The article supplements the research emerged in Russia and in the West that addresses the issue of the new economic geography of the neo-global world. The article also gives the opportunity to clarify the perspective niche that Russia can occupy in the perspective geoeconomic architecture.

1. Avatkov V. A. Through crises to stable “neo-Ottomanism”. Political results of Turkey in 2021 // Free Thought [Svobodnaya mysl’]. 2022. N 1 (1691). P. 115–126. (In Russ.)

2. Brzezinski Z. [The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. New York: Basic Books, 2004. 256 p.]. Rus. ed.: Moscow n: International relations, 2004. 288 p.

3. Wallerstein I. [World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press, 2004. 109 p.]. Rus. ed.: Moscow : URSS: LENAND, 2018, 304 p.

4. Evstafiev D. G., Tsyganova L. A. Post-global model of social development: dialectic of continu-ity and negation // Age of globalization [Vek globalizatsii]. 2022. N 1 (41). P. 42–54. (In Russ.)

5. Zakharov A. N. Prospects for the reindustrialization of developed economies (USA, Canada, and Australia) // MGIMO Review of International Relations [Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta]. 2018. N 1. P. 213–245. (In Russ.)

6. Manoilo A. V., Zaitsev A.Ya. International legal status of private military companies // Herald of the russian academy of sciences [Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk]. 2020. Vol. 90. N 1. P. 47–55. (In Russ.)

7. Romanova T. Discourse on the sovereignty of the European Union: content and consequences // Contemporary Europe [Sovremennaya Evropa]. 2021. N 5. P. 32‒44. (In Russ.)

8. Sluka N. A. Geodemographic phenomena of global cities. Moscow–Smolensk: Oikumena, 2009. 317 p. (In Russ.)

9. Spence M. [The Next Convergence: The Future of Economic Growht in a Multispeed World. UWA Publishing Crawley, W. A. 2011. 320 p.] Rus. ed.: Moscow : Publishing house of the Gaidar Institute, 2013. 336 p.

10. Stiglitz J. [The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York : W. W. Norton & Company, 2015. 464 p.]. Rus. ed.: Moscow : Eksmo, 2016, 480 p.

11. Therborn J. [Cities of Power: The Urban, The National, The Popular, The Global. London : Verso, 2017. 416 p.]. Rus. ed.: Moscow : Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2019. 472 p.

12. Fukuyama F. [Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment New York : Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2018. 240 p.]. Rus. ed.: Moscow : Alpina Publisher, 2019. 256 p.

13. Fukuyama F. [Political Order and Political Decay from the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York : Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2014. 672 p.]. Rus. ed.: Moscow : AST Publishing House, 2017, 704 p.

14. Haas R. [A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York : Penguin Press, 2017. 352 p.] Rus. ed.: Moscow : AST Publishing House, 2019, 320 p.

15. Tsygankov V. V. World-system analysis: “hard core” and “protective belt” // Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology and Political Science]. 2012. N 4 (20). P. 95–101. (In Russ.)

16. Schwab K., Vanham P. [Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy that Works for Progress, People and Planet. Hoboken, New Jersey : Wiley, 2021. 304 p.]. Rus. ed.: Moscow : Bombora, 2022. 352 p.

17. Shumkoski G. Global transfer of neoliberal models and the doctrine of the sovereign state // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Series: International relations [Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya]. 2022. N 4 (22). P. 771–787. (In Russ.)

18. Chase-Dunn Ch. Comparing World Systems: Toward a Theory of Semipheral Development // Comparative Civilizations Review. 1988. Vol. 19. N 19. Art. 3 [Electronic source]. URL: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol19/iss19/3 (accessed: 15.02.2024).

19. Daalder I., Lindsay J. The Empty Throne. American Abdication of Global Leadership. New York : Public Affairs, 2018. 239 p.

20. Friedman T. The world is Flat. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giraux. 2005. 488 p.

21. Haas R. How a World Order Ends. And What Comes in Its Wake // Foreign Affairs. January/February. 2019 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-12-11/how-world-order-ends?cid=int-nbb&pgtype=hpg (accessed: 15.02.2024).

22. Haas R. Present at the Destruction. Trump’s Final Act Has Accelerated the Onset of a PostAmerican World // Foreign Affairs. 2021. January 11. [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-01-11/present-destruction (accessed: 15.02.2024).

23. Nye J.Jr. How Sharp Power Threatens Soft Power. The Right and Wrong Ways to Respond to Authoritarian Influence // Foreign Affairs, January, 24, 2018 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-01-24/how-sharp-power-threatens-soft-power (accessed: 15.02.2024).