Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Probabilistic and Statistical Approach to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Management Decisions

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-2-59-71

EDN: EXKUSY

Abstract

In a number of works by domestic and foreign authors, modern methods are proposed to solve the problem of the effectiveness of decision-making and execution. Quite satisfactory results have been achieved both in theoretical, methodological and applied terms. However, this only casually mentions the effect that occurs in any, and not only an unrealized solution — the appearance of some remnants; not unrealization, but fundamental unrealizability without a remainder. The very nature of unrealizability or the presence of residual has not been considered before, although the effect of residual is constantly observed. The discrepancy between the solution and its implementation was associated with the insufficient quality of the solution or with the shortcomings of its implementation, which is considered in the context of “incomplete information” and “the presence of hidden variables/factors”. This understanding allowed the remnants themselves to be considered in several angles and aspects: a) as a residue from the implementation (“unrealized opportunities”), b) as an over-realization of realized opportunities, c) as errors in the development of solutions, d) as technical, organizational, etc. disadvantages in the implementation of the solution, etc. However, the immediate consideration of the problem of evaluating the effectiveness of decision-making indicates the presence of a fundamental unrealizability in it, which is expressed in the appearance of a remainder when it is implemented in any case. Moreover, this remainder is not associated with realizability as such and not with the solution as such, but with the presence of a special property of residuality, which is of a fundamental nature. The purpose is to identify, describe and propose a method for assessing the phenomenon associated with the incompleteness of the implementation of a management decision, regardless of its quality. A set of logical and descriptive methods was used in the study. Results: a review of situations with the appearance of residues in decisionmaking is carried out; a criterion and a method for evaluating the effectiveness of decisionmaking is proposed, a rule for the residual implementation of a decision is formulated; a justification of the proposed rule in various aspects is given; a classification of options for the unrealizability of decisions is proposed. The results obtained can be useful in making and implementing a decision.

About the Authors

T. Kh. Toguzaev
Kabardino-Balkarian State Agricultural University named after V. M. Kokov
Russian Federation

Takhir Kh. Toguzaev, Professor of the Department of Economics, Doctor of Science (Economics), Associate Professor

Nalchik

 

   


V. V. Kalitskaya
Ural State Economic University
Russian Federation

Victoria V. Kalitskaya, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics of the Social Sphere, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor

Ekaterinburg



O. A. Rykalina
Ural State Economic University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Rykalina, Associate Professor, Department of Accounting and Auditing, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor

Ekaterinburg



A. H. Sabanchiev
Institute of Regional Management Problems (IRMP) Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Anzor H. Sabanchiev, senior researcher at the Institute of Regional Management Problems (IPRU), Candidate of Sciences (Economics)

Nalchik

   


References

1. Alibiy F. M., Sabanchiev A. Kh., Kuchukov M. M. Does the size of the economy affect the dynamics and scale of its intellectualization and conflict potential? // Economics and entrepreneurship [Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo]. 2023. N 4 (153). (In Russ.) DOI: 10.34925/ EIP.2023.153.4.024.

2. Buttrick R. Technique for making effective management decisions / R. Buttrick; [transl. from English A. Romanchenko]. 2nd ed. Moscow [etc.] : Piter, 2006. 413 p. (In Russ.)

3. Vertakova Yu. V., Kozyeva I. A., Kuzbozhev E. N. Management decisions: development and choice. Moscow: KNORUS. 2005. 352 p. (In Russ.).

4. Gödel K. Russellian mathematical logic / Russell B. Introduction to mathematical philosophy. Novosibirsk, 2007. P. 237–261. (In Russ.).

5. Gödel K. F. Compatibility of the axiom of choice and the generalized continuum hypothesis of set theory // Successes of mathematical sciences [Uspekhi matematicheskih nauk]. 1948. N 3. P. 96–149. (In Russ.).

6. Gilboa I. How to make the best decision? The theory of decision making in practice. Moscow : Publishing House «Delo» RANEPA, 2017. 288 p. (In Russ.).

7. Glazyev S.Yu., Sabden O., Armensky A. E., Naumov E. A. Intelligent economy — technological challenges of the 21st century. Almaty: Exclusive. 2009. 315 p. (In Russ.).

8. Keeney R. L. Decision making under multiple criteria: preferences and substitutions. Moscow : Radio and communications. 1981. 560 p. (In Russ.).

9. Levina S.Sh. Management decisions: monograph. / S.Sh. Levina, R.Yu. Turchaeva. Moscow : Phoenix. 2019. 224 p. (In Russ.).

10. Litvak B. G. Development of a management solution. Moscow : Publishing house «Delo», 2004. 392 p. (In Russ.).

11. Rakhaev B., Bizengin B. The influence of perceptions and ideas of time on economic develop-ment // Society and economics [Obshchestvo i ekonomika]. 2011. N 11–12. С. 101–116. EDN OTQBLX. (In Russ.).

12. Rakhaev Kh. M. and others. Paradoxes and contradictions of the theory of decision making / Kh. M. Rakhaev, A. V. Gyatov, T. Kh. Toguzaev // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. N 8. P. 47–59. (In Russ.) DOI 10.22394/1726-1139-2019-8-47-59.

13. Rosen V. V. Mathematical models of decision making in economics. Moscow: Book House “University”, Higher School. 2002. 228 p. (In Russ.).

14. Solntseva G. N. Decision making and reflection // Decision support. Proceedings of the Institute of System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 35. ISA RAS Moscow, 2008. P. 54–71. (In Russ.).

15. Taylor F. Scientific organization of labor. Moscow, 1925. 276 p. (In Russ.).

16. Trofimov V. V. Methods for making management decisions / V. V. Trofimov, L. A. Trofimova. Moscow : Jurayt. 2017. 336 p. (In Russ.).

17. Ford G. My life, my achievements / Henry Ford. Moscow : Finance and Statistics, 1989. 205 p. (In Russ.).

18. Emerson G. Twelve principles of productivity. 2nd ed. Moscow : Economics. 1992. 224 p. (In Russ.).

19. Yukaeva V. S. Making management decisions / V. S. Yukaeva, E. V. Zubareva, V. V. Chuvikova. Moscow : Dashkov and Co. 2019. 324 p. (In Russ.).

20. Iacocca L. Manager’s career. Moscow : Progress, 1991. 384 p.


Review

For citations:


Toguzaev T.Kh., Kalitskaya V.V., Rykalina O.A., Sabanchiev A.H. Probabilistic and Statistical Approach to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Management Decisions. Administrative Consulting. 2024;(2):59-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-2-59-71. EDN: EXKUSY

Views: 350


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)