Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Justification Strategic Priorities of Investment Development of the Republic of Armenia

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-2-72-91

EDN: EXNJFQ

Abstract

The Republic of Armenia requires investments for economic growth and development, including foreign direct investment due to the small capacity of the domestic market. The investment strategy must be consistent with the national development strategy and must be the resource base of the national strategy in terms of realizing the values and interests of the country’s residents. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the strategic priorities of investment development of the Republic of Armenia and to identify priority development sectors that have competitive advantages and investment potential. The methodological basis of the research is the theory of strategy and methodology of strategizing by academician V. L. Kvint. According to the strategy methodology, an analysis of global investment and national trends was carried out, and successful international experience in attracting investments was studied. The experience of Israel is considered, which demonstrates a striking example of improving the investment attractiveness of the country thanks to an effective investment strategy. The strategic priorities of Israel’s investment strategy are highlighted, some of which need to be implemented in the practice of attracting investments in the Republic of Armenia. To substantiate strategic priorities and highlight highly competitive industries, regulations governing the attraction of foreign direct investment in Armenia, the economic state of Armenia were studied, and an OTWS analysis of investment activity was conducted. Based on the results of a comprehensive analysis, the authors propose two groups of strategic priorities: primary strategic priorities and auxiliary priorities that enhance the significance and effectiveness of the former. The study shows that strategic industries with competitive advantages and investment potential for Armenia are the chemical and metallurgical industries, textile and clothing industries, tourism, pharmaceuticals, and agro-industry. An effective investment strategy for the Republic of Armenia is the basis for the country’s further development.

About the Authors

L.  I.  Vlasyuk
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

lyudmila I.  Vlasyuk, Associate Professor of Economic and Financial Strategy Department, Moscow School of Economics, PhD in Economic, Associate Professor

Moscow

   


A. N. Yolchyan
Branch of Moscow Lomonosov State University in Yerevan
Armenia

Arpine N. Yolchyan, Master

Yerevan



References

1. Ayriyan E. International legal regulation of foreign investments in Armenia: problems and pros-pects // Դատական իշխանություն. 2022. N 7–9. P. 95–103. (In Russ.)

2. Bolodurina M. P., Mishurova A. I. Analysis of criteria for assessing the effectiveness of foreign direct investment // National interests: priorities and security [Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’]. 2017. T. 13. N 8 (353). P. 1475–1490. (In Russ.)

3. Dubson B. I. Modern Israel: socio-economic essays. International relations, 2014. 376 c. (In Russ.)

4. Quintus V. L. The concept of strategizing. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg : NVIM of RANEPA, 2019. 132 p. (Ser. “Strategist’s Library”). (In Russ.)

5. Quintus V. L. The concept of strategizing. Vol. 2. Saint Petersburg : NVIM of RANEPA, 2020. 164 p. (Ser. “Strategist’s Library”). (In Russ.)

6. Quintus V. L. On choosing priorities // Budget [Byudzhet]. 2016. N 11. P. 78–81. (In Russ.)

7. Quintus V. L. Strategic governance and economics in the global emerging market. Moscow : Business Atlas, 2012. 627 c. (In Russ.)

8. Kozyrev A. A. Researching the methodological foundations of the strategy of socio-economic development // Industrial economy [Ekonomika promyshlennosti]. 2020. Vol. 13. N 4. P. 434– 447. (In Russ.)

9. Maryasis D. A. Experience in building an innovation economy. Example of Israel. Moscow : Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. 268 p. (In Russ.)

10. Mirziyoyeva S.Sh. Analysis of Uzbekistan’s experience in developing development strategies for the country and regions // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. N 3 (123). P. 49–61. (In Russ.)

11. Mirziyoyeva S.Sh. Justification of the strategic priority of industries in the structure of the economy of Uzbekistan // Industrial economy [Ekonomika promyshlennosti]. 2019. Vol. 12. N 1. P. 4–17. (In Russ.)

12. Mirziyoyeva S.Sh. Taking into account global and national trends and features of socio-economic development in the development of state strategies // Economic revival of Russia [Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii]. 2020. N 1 (63). P. 69–78. (In Russ.)

13. Mirziyoyeva S.Sh. Methodological Foundations for the Strategy of Socio-Economic Development of Uzbekistan. Saint Petersburg : NVIM of RANEPA, 2020. 184 p. (In Russ.)

14. Assessment of growth factors and forecasting of socio-economic development of Russian regions / G. P. Bystray, A. V. Vasilyeva, L. I. Vlasyuk [et al.]. Yekaterinburg : Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012. 178 p. (In Russ.)

15. Alfaro L. et al. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Economic Growth? Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, 2006.

16. Alfaro L., Chen M. X. Market Reallocation and Knowledge Spillover: The Gains from Multinational Production. 2013. Working Papers 2013–17, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

17. Azémar C., Giroud A. World Investment Report 2022: International tax reforms and sustainable investment: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development // Journal of International Business Policy. 2023. N 6. P. 235–239.

18. Blomstrom M., Kokko A. The Economics of Foreign Direct Investment Incentives (February 2003). NBER Working Paper No. w9489 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=379960 (accessed: 07.02.2024).

19. Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximising benefits, minimising costs. OESD. 2002. 222p. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264199286-en

20. Heilbron A., Whyte R. Institutions for Investment: Establishing a High-Performing Institutional Framework for Foreign Direct Investment. Finance, Competitiveness, and Innovation In Focus. Washington, DC : World Bank. 2019 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33285 (accessed: 07.02.2024).

21. Newland K., Plaza S. What we Know About Diasporas and Economic Development // Policy Brief. 2013. N 5.

22. Porter M. E. Competitive strategy. Measuring business excellence. 1997. Vol. 1. N 2. P. 12–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025476

23. Senor D., Singer S. Start-up nation: The story of Israel’s economic miracle. McClelland & Stewart, 2011. 312 c.

24. World Bank. Global Economic Prospects, January 2023. The World Bank, 2023.

25. World Bank. Global investment competitiveness report 2017/2018: Foreign investor perspectives and policy implications. The World Bank, 2017.

26. Դեպի ռազմավարության տեսության ակունքները: Գեներալ Ժոմինիի տեսական աշխատանքի հրատարակման 200-ամյակը. Սանկտ Պետերբուրգ: SZIU RANEPA, 2023. 54 p. ISBN 978-589781-768-9

27. Հայաստանի ներդրումները. մարտահրավերներ և հնարավորություններ / Լ. Սարգսյան և ուրիշներ, -Եր.: ՀՀ ԳԱԱ Մ. Քոթանյանի անվան տնտեսագիտության ինստիտուտ, 2020. 320 էջ.


Review

For citations:


Vlasyuk L.I., Yolchyan A.N. Justification Strategic Priorities of Investment Development of the Republic of Armenia. Administrative Consulting. 2024;(2):72-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-2-72-91. EDN: EXNJFQ

Views: 470


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)