Resource Taxes in Russia and China: Pro et Contra
Abstract
The article discusses the resource potential in the context of national security. The authors describe ‘traps’ of a resource economy. There are assessed the role and importance of natural resource taxation in Russia and China. The dynamics of tax income from mineral resources is given. There are substantiated the main directions of improving taxes and payments for mineral in Russia and China.
About the Authors
Evgenia Anatolievna Kuklina
North-West Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Xiaoging Zhu
Beijing Administrative Institute
China
China
Yuxiu Sun
Beijing Administrative Institute
China
China
Linlin Diyao
Beijing Administrative Institute
China
China
References
1. Richness of a subsoil of Russia. Mineral and raw and cost analysis [Bogatstvo nedr Rossii. Mineral’no-syr’evoi i stoimostnyi analiz] / Edition B. K. Mikhaylov, O. V. Petrov, S. A. Kimelman. 2-nd edition. SPb. : Publishing house of Russian Geological Research Institute [Izd-vo VSEGEI], 2008. 484 p.
2. Kimelman S. A., Kuklina E. A. System of paid subsurface use in Russia: current state and prospects of development [Sistema platnogo nedropol’zovaniya v Rossii: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya] // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie], N 4, 2013. P. 95–108.
3. Kuklina E.A. “Geometry” of development of economic systems in a global context [«Geometriya» razvitiya ekonomicheskikh sistem v global’nom kontekste] / Dialogue of cultures and partnership of civilizations : XIV International Likhachev scientific readings [Dialog kul’tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsii: XIV Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya], on May 15–20, 2014 / scientific edition of A. S. Zapesotsky. SPb. : SPbUHSS [SPbGUP], 2014. P. 498–500.
4. Kuklina E. A., Fedorkov A. I. The analysis of system of the taxation of subsurface use in the People’s Republic of China in the context of realization of economic strategy of the state [Analiz sistemy nalogooblozheniya nedropol’zovaniya v KNR v kontekste realizatsii ekonomicheskoi strategii gosudarstva] // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie], N 8, 2014. P. 59–67.
5. Mineral resources and economic development [Mineral’nye resursy i ekonomicheskoe razvitie]. Collection of scientific works. Executive edition: V. B. Kondratyev, Yu. L. Adno. M. : Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences [IMEMO RAN], 2010. 211 p.
6. Polterovich V., Popov V., Tonis A. Mechanisms of “a resource damnation” and economic policy [Mekhanizmy «resursnogo proklyatiya» i ekonomicheskaya politika] // Economy Questions [Voprosy ekonomiki], N 6, 2007. P. 4–27.
7. Young O. Oran Resources Regimes. Natural Resources and Social Institutions. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California. 1982. 280 p.
8. Tornell A., Lane Ph. (1994) ‘Are Windfalls a Curse? A Non-Representative Agent Model of the Current Account and Fiscal Policy’, NBER Working Paper. N 4839.
9. Sachs J. D., Warner A. M. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth / NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper 5398. 1995.
Review
For citations:
Kuklina E.A., Zhu X., Sun Yu., Diyao L. Resource Taxes in Russia and China: Pro et Contra. Administrative Consulting. 2015;(2):65-76. (In Russ.)
Views:
320
Email this article 