Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Paradiplomacy as a Way of Promotion of Regional Identity of the Subjects of Federations

Abstract

The article is devoted to the international activity of the subjects of federations, to the theoretical approaches to this phenomenon as well as its practical aspects. Special attention is given to the international relations of the subjects with some ethnic and/or linguistic specificity. It analyses the interaction between international activities of such subjects and the promotion of their special regional identity. This phenomenon is described as identifying paradiplomacy. The article deals with its constitutional and legal status, its interconnection with general principles of federalism, specificity of different types of federalism. The examples include the international activity of Quebec, a French-speaking Canadian province, which is one of the most active and visible non-sovereign territorial actors on the world stage for several decades since 1960s till present. It also deals with international activity of the republic of Tatarstan and some other republics of the Russian Federation. The article shows the positive and the negative sides of the identifying paradiplomacy.

About the Author

Yury Germanovich Akimov
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Akimov Yu.G. Quebec paradiplomacy and position of the federal government of Canada: from the conflict to a compromise [Kvebekskaya paradiplomatiya i pozitsiya federal’nogo pravitel’stva Kanady: ot konflikta k kompromissu] // Bulletin of the Saint-Petersburg State University [Vestnik S.-Peterb. un-ta]. 2011.Series 6. V. 4. P. 48–56. (rus)

2. Akimov Yu.G. «Long live free Quebec!» — Charles de Gaulle and the French Canada [«Da zdravstvuet svobodnyi Kvebek!» — Sharl’ de Goll’ i Frantsuzskaya Kanada] // Clio [KLIO]. 2015. N 3. P. 241. (rus)

3. Kuznetsov A.S. Paradiplomacy: treatments and theoretical models [Paradiplomatiya: traktovki i teoreticheskie modeli] // Discourse Pi. Scientific and practical almanac [Diskurs-Pi. Nauchnoprakticheskii al’manakh]. V. 6. Yekaterinburg : Publishing house of USU, 2006. P. 76–78. (rus)

4. Farukshin M. H. Subjects of federations in the international relations [Sub”ekty federatsii v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh] // Political Researches [POLIS]. 1995. N 6. P. 109–118. (rus)

5. Shaimiev M.Sh. The message of the President of the Republic of Tatarstan to the State Council of the Republic of Tatarstan «About situation in the Republic and the main directions of social and economic policy in 2002» [Poslanie Prezidenta Respubliki Tatarstan Gosudarstvennomu Sovetu Respubliki Tatarstan «O polozhenii v respublike i osnovnykh napravleniyakh sotsial’noekonomicheskoi politiki v 2002 godu»] // the Republic of Tatarstan. Political newspaper [Respublika Tatarstan. Obshchestvenno-politicheskaya gazeta]. 01.03.2002. [electronic resource]. URL: http:// www.rt-online.ru/aticles/rubric-69/44471/ (rus)

6. Shilo V. E. Canadian federalism and international relations [Kanadskii federalizm i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya]. M. : Science [Nauka], 1985. (rus)

7. Morin C. Le combat québécois. Montréal : Boréal Express, 1973.

8. Paquin S. Paradiplomatie et relations internationales. Théories des stratégies internationales des régions face à la mondialisation. Bruxelles: Les presses interuniversitaires européennes — Peter-Lang. 2004.

9. Wolff S. Paradiplomacy: Scope, Opportunities and Challenges // The Bologna Center Journal of International Affairs. 2007. Vol. 10, N 1. P. 141–150.


Review

For citations:


Akimov Yu.G. Paradiplomacy as a Way of Promotion of Regional Identity of the Subjects of Federations. Administrative Consulting. 2016;(2):25-33. (In Russ.)

Views: 676


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)