Zangezur and South Araz Transport Projects: Problems of Implementation in the Context of Relations between Armenia, Iran and Azerbaijan

From the second half of 2022, there have been noticeable changes in the balance of power in the South Caucasus. Russia’s influence on the negotiation process between Armenia and Azerbaijan has weakened. Western actors (the United States, NATO, the EU, France) managed to oust it in regional politics, strengthen their positions on mediation and arbitration. In a certain way, this affected the foreign policy of Yerevan, which reduced its interaction with the Collective Security Treaty Organization and the Russian Federation and noticeably became closer to the structures of the West. The prospect of maintaining the Russian military presence in Armenia has become less obvious. Due to the destructive policy of the Armenian leadership, the legal framework for unblocking the Zangezur transport corridor and ensuring its functioning under Russian neutral control has been destroyed. Consequently, Russia has lost the motive for further participation in the work of the trilateral Working Group jointly between Baku and Yerevan. Perhaps it should stop supporting the Zangezur project with the participation of Armenia and focus on the implementation of a joint project between Tehran and Baku to create the infrastructure of the South Araz Corridor through Iran. Despite the existing obstacles and numerous negative forecasts, the latter has a good prospect, since it is based on the long-term experience of interested cooperation between Iran and Azerbaijan.

The implementation of the South Araz project promises benefits to all countries in the region. First, the scale of transport and logistics activities related to communication along the East — West corridor will significantly increase. It will be possible to optimize cargo transportation on the Baku — Tbilisi — Kars route. The economic development of territories along the line from Goradiz to Ordubad district of Nakhichevan, as well as the eastern regions of Turkey, will accelerate. The emerging strategic cooperation between Russia and Iran, and the latter with Azerbaijan, will be strengthened, primarily in solving the task of strengthening the capacity of the North–South transport corridor. Therefore, if successful, we have the right to expect a rapprochement of the positions of Russia, Iran and Turkey, and an intensification of their joint efforts to resolve a wide range of problems in the South Caucasus based on the Turkish 3+3 initiative. It can be assumed that the construction of the South Arab corridor will contribute to the depoliticization of relations between Yerevan and Baku, accelerate their resolution of issues related to the delimitation and demarcation of the common border, and bring them closer to concluding a peace treaty.

1. Abbasov N. The role of the Zangezur corridor in the integration of Azerbaijan into the world economy // Financial Economics [Finansovaya ekonomika]. 2024. N 1. P. 3–5. (In Russ.)

2. Agaev I. G. Interests of regional and world powers in the opening of the Zangezur corridor // Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation: materials of the Fifth International Scientific and Practical Conference “Greater Eurasia: national and civilizational aspects of development and cooperation”. Part 1. Yearbook. Issue 6. Part 1. M., 2023. P. 13–18. (In Russ.)

3. Agazade M. M. Azerbaijani Iranian relations after the Second Karabakh War: features and trends // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov]. Ser.: International Relations. 2023. Vol. 23. N 4. P. 719–73. (In Russ.)

4. Aristova L. B. Formation of a single Eurasian transport space with the development of the ITC // Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation: materials of the Fifth International Scientific and practical Conference “Greater Eurasia: national and civilizational aspects of development and cooperation”. P. 1. Yearbook. Is. 6. P. 1. M., 2023. P. 389–391. (In Russ.)

5. Arkhipova E. V. Hostage to infrastructural contradictions in the Caucasus: Nagorno-Karabakh after 2020 // Bulletin of the Volgograd State University [Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. Episode 4, History. Regional studies. International relations. 2023. Vol. 28. N 5. P. 186–200. (In Russ.)

6. Arkhipova E. V. International competition for the development of transport corridors in the South Caucasus // Problems of integrated security of the Caspian macroregion. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference / gen. ed. by A. P. Romanova, D. A. Chernichkin. Astrakhan, 2023. P. 50–56. (In Russ.)

7. Asadov A. M., Salakhova S. H. The political and economic significance of the opening of the Zangezur corridor for the countries of the region // Problems of sustainable economic development in the information society. Sumgait, December 16–17, 2021. Vol. 10. Sumgayit : Sumgait State University, 2021. P. 43–46. (In Russ.)

8. Asaul M. A., Malygin I. G., Mokhov A. E. International transport corridors of Eurasia and the Silk Road Economic Belt // Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2019. N 4. P. 3–40. (In Russ.)

9. Akhmedov M. A. The Zengezur corridor is the most important factor in the development of national economies of the countries of the Eurasian region // Competition of economic systems of the Eurasian and Western European type: a collection of scientific articles on the results of the VIII international scientific conference “The state and the market: The Eurasian dominant of development in the formation of a multipolar world”. Saint Petersburg, October 19–20, 2023 / ed. by Dr. of Economics, prof. T. A. Selishcheva, Candidate of Economics,Associate Professor N. V. Sopina. Saint Petersburg : Publishing House of SPbGEU, 2023. P. 192–196. (In Russ.)

10. Golmohammadi V., Markedonov S. M. How Iran Perceives Turkey’s Rise in the South Caucasus // Russia in Global Affairs. 2024. N 22 (1). P. 152–175 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/iran-and-turkeys-rise/ (accessed: 20.04.2024). (In Russ.)

11. Malysheva D. B. Russia and the transit corridors of Eurasia // Russia and the new states of Eurasia [Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii]. 2023. N 2 (59). P. 91–102. (In Russ.)

12. Markelov K. A., Usmanov R. H., Golovin V. G. The Black Sea-Caspian region: from geopolitics to geo-economics of transport systems // The Caspian region: politics, economics, culture [Kaspiiskii region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura]. 2019. N 1 (58). P. 74–88. (In Russ.)

13. Martynova E. International transport corridors as a factor in the formation of a Large Eurasian partnership // Russia and the new states of Eurasia [Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii]. 2023. No. III (LX). P. 68–77. (In Russ.)

14. Niazov N. S. Zangezur corridor as a carcass of the “New Eurasia”? // In the collection: Humanities in a modern university: yesterday, today, tomorrow: proceedings of the IV International scientific conference. Saint Petersburg, December 10, 2021. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg : Publishing House of the Saint Petersburg State University of Technology and Design, 2021. P. 322–329. (In Russ.)

15. Ovyan V. About speculations about the “Zangezur corridor” // Bulletin “Amberd” [Byulleten’ «Amberd»]. 2022. N 5 (18). P. 90–95. (In Russ.)

16. Stepanov N. S. Transport corridors within the framework of the Chinese initiative “One Belt, one Road” // Bulletin of the National Research Institute [Vestnik NGIEI]. 2021. N 8 (123). P. 112–119. (In Russ.)

17. Tarkhanova Zh. D., Vielmini F. Transport corridors and geopolitical rivalry in the South Caucasus after the Karabakh war in 2020 // Izvestiya SOIGSI. The School of Young Scientists [Izvestiya SOIGSI. Shkola molodykh uchenykh]. 2023. Is. 3. P. 185–202.

18. Chebotareva E. A., Solop I. A., Merkulov I. V. The Zangezur corridor: the main provisions, problems, and prospects for the development of overland land communication // Bulletin of the Moscow Automobile and Road Transport State Technical University (MADI) [Vestnik Moskovskogo avtomobil’no-dorozhnogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (MADI)]. 2023. N 4 (75). P. 86–92. (In Russ.)

19. Chedia A. R. Zangezur Corridor: Economic Potential and Political Constraints // Russia in Global Affairs [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. 2024. N 22 (1). P. 194–216 [Electronic resource]. URL https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/zangezur-corridor/ (accessed: 20.04.2024). (In Russ.)

20. Shumilov M. M., Shumilov Y. M. External factors of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict in the context of the second Karabakh war // Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2022. N 3. P. 126–136. (In Russ.)

21. Shumilov M. M. The Influence of Pan-Turkism on the Political Identity Formation of the Turkic States of Central Asia in the XXI Century (P. 1) // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2022. N 6. P. 36–53. (In Russ.)

22. Shumilov M. M. The Influence of Pan-Turkism on the Political Identity Formation of the Turkic States of Central Asia in the XXI Century (P. 2) // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2022. N 7. P. 37–49. (In Russ.)

23. Abdullaev K. N. The development transport connection Azerbaijan Republic with European Union’s countries on the base of international transit transport projects “East-West” (Traceca), “North-South” and “South-East” // Accounting and Statistics [Uchet i statistika]. 2018. N 3 (51). P. 108–116.

24. Havlicek P., Iskandarov K. The Zangezur Corridor as part of the global transport route (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region) // Security and Defense. Quarterly. 2023. March. N 41 (1). P. 36–53.

25. Gulakhmadov M., Huseyn R. The Zangazur Corridor as the new haulage hub for integration and cooperation in the South Caucasus haulage // Business and Information Technologies. 2023. Vol. XIII (1). P. 121–128.

26. Monshipuri M., Kheiran-Niya J. Iran’s Security Interests and Policies in the South Caucasus // Iran and the Caucasus 2021. Vol. 25. Is. 3. P. 284–300.