Assessment of the Quality of the Regional Investment Environment in the Context of Ensuring the Technological Sovereignty of the Economy
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-4-86-103
EDN: OFEAON
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to develop and test a methodological approach to assessing the effectiveness of the regional investment environment in the context of the intensification of technological development of the country and regions and the achievement of technological sovereignty of the national economy.
The research uses information data related to investment development institutions; materials of regional Development Strategies, regulatory legal acts; information posted on websites and portals dedicated to the investment policy of the regions. The article has been prepared using the following methods of scientific research: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, generalization.
The analysis of scientific sources on the research problem was carried out, on the basis of which the author’s methodological approach to assessing the quality of the regional investment environment in terms of ensuring the technological sovereignty of the economy was developed and tested. In the process of approbation, integral indicators of the quality of the regional investment environment were calculated, as a result of which the level of its quality was identified according to the analyzed methodological blocks. According to the results of the approbation, gaps and shortcomings in the system of the regional investment environment were identified and conclusions about the trends of its development were concluded.
The results obtained indicate the presence of problems and a number of limitations in the formed regional investment environment for regulating innovation, investment and technological development of the economy. The practical significance of the work lies in the proven methodological approach to assessing the quality of the regional investment environment. The results of the work can be applied by the authorities in order to achieve technological independence of the region’s economy.
About the Author
L. S. NevyantsevaRussian Federation
Lilia S. Nevyantseva, candidate
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Animitsa E. G., Rakhmeeva I. I. Econometric factor analysis of the development of the regions of the Ural macroregion in the era of the fourth industrial Revolution // Society and power [Socium i vlast`]. 2020. N 5 (85). P. 51–64. (In Russ.)
2. Afanasyev A. A. Technological sovereignty as a scientific category in the system of modern knowledge // Economics of entrepreneurship and law [Ekonomika predprinimatel`stva i prava]. 2022. Vol. 12. N 3. P. 2377–2394. (In Russ.)
3. Afanasyev A. A. Technological sovereignty: the main directions of policy to achieve it in modern Russia // Issues of innovative economics [Voprosy` innovacionnoj ekonomiki]. 2022. V. 12. N. 4. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.4.116433
4. Bazhenov S. I. Institutional environment as a factor of ensuring regional economic security // Bulletin of the Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus [Vestnik Akademii MVD Respubliki Belarus`]. 2022. N. 1 (43). P. 48–54 (in Belarus).
5. Voronina E. A. Institutional investment environment in Russia // Theory and practice of the service: economics, social sphere, technology [Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, social`naya sfera, texnologii]. 2013. N 1 (15). P. 163–168. (In Russ.)
6. Voronina L. V., Grigorishchin A. V., Kovrov D. Yu., Oshomkov T. A. The institutional environment as a factor in the development of the social infrastructure of the Arctic zone of the Northern macroregion // Corporate governance and innovative development of the economy of the North: Bulletin of the Scientific Research Center for Corporate Law, Management and Venture Investment of Syktyvkar State University [Korporativnoe upravlenie i innovacionnoe razvitie ekonomiki Severa: Vestnik Nauchno-issledovatel’skogo centra korporativnogo prava,upravleniya i venchurnogo investirovaniya Syktyvkarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. 2022. V. 2. I. 2. P. 145–156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34130/2070-4992-2022-2-2-145
7. Evloeva A. H. The institutional environment for the implementation of investment behavior of households // Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Economy [Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika]. 2023. V. 25. N 1. P. 28–38. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2023.1.3
8. Kirillova O. Yu., Zimin I. A. Development of a methodological approach to the assessment of infrastructural support for innovative development of the region // Innovations and investments [Innovacii i investicii]. 2017. N 9. P. 6–14. (In Russ.)
9. Klimovich M. A. The institutional environment and its transformational potential in the context of a new technological revolution // Economics and innovation management [Ekonomika i upravlenie innovaciyami]. 2019. N. 1 (8). P. 18–26. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26730/2587-5574-2019-1-18-25
10. Komilov S. J., Fayzulloev M. K. Formation of the national innovation system of the Republic of Tajikistan as a condition for ensuring the modernization of the country’s economy // Problems of modern economics. Eurasian International Scientific and Analytical Journal. [Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki. Evrazijskij mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal]. Saint Petersburg. 2011. N 2 (38). (In Russ.)
11. Kotov A. V. Assessment of the effectiveness of regional policy instruments // The economy of the region [Ekonomika regiona]. 2020. V. 16. Is. 2. P. 352–362. (In Russ.)
12. Kotlyarova S. N. Conceptual approaches to assessing the impact of infrastructure on regional development // Regional economics and management: electronic scientific journal. ISSN 1999-2645. N. 3 (31). (In Russ.)
13. Kuchmistaya O. G. Institutional factors of economic development of the region // Days of Science of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University : sat. tr. V scientific and Practical conference, Simferopol, October 30 — November 1, 2019 / Crimea. feder. V. I. Vernadsky University. Simferopol. 2019. (In Russ.)
14. Lenchuk E. B., Filatov V. I. Strategic planning as a tool to overcome Russia’s technological lag // The world of the new Economy [Mir novoj ekonomiki]. N 2. 2019. P. 32–42. (In Russ.)
15. Lyashenko E. A., Zhukovsky A. D. The institutional environment for the development of high-tech industries in the region // Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Ser.: Economics and Management [Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2022. N 1. P. 72–84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2022.1/3934
16. Mironov D. S. The institutional environment of innovative activity of an industrial enterprise: conditions, factors, problems // Human Progress [Human Progress]. 2021. V. 7. Is. 4. (In Russ.)
17. Petrov M. N., Filippov Ya. S. Technological sovereignty: basic principles of the concept of national scientific and technological security // Issues of innovative economics sovereignty [Voprosy innovacionnoj ekonomiki]. 2023. Vol. 13. N 3. P. 1185–1198. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18334/vinec.13.3.118646
18. Prikhodko I. I. Theoretical aspects of the technological concept sovereignty. Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Economics and management [Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeny V. I. Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2022. V. 8 (74). N 4. P. 88–96. (In Russ.)
19. Ruban D. A. Management of innovative systems and investment environment of regions // Bulletin of the NGUEU [Vestnik NGUEHU]. 2016. N 2. P. 82–95. (In Russ.)
20. Savon I. V. A systematic approach to the management of investment processes at the regional level // Financial research [Finansovye issledovaniya]. 2012. N 1 (34). (In Russ.)
21. Serova V. A., Serova N. A. Methodological aspects of evaluating the effectiveness of regional investment policy // Fundamental Research [Fundamental’nye issledovaniya]. 2021. N 1. P. 95–99. (In Russ.)
22. Silova E. S. The quality of the institutional environment and its impact on economic growth // Dissertation of the Candidate of Economic Sciences. Chelyabinsk. 2007. (In Russ.)
23. Sidorenko O. V. Innovation and investment environment of the region as a factor of increasing its competitiveness // Global and Regional Research. 2019. V. 1. N 3. P. 187–193. (In Russ.)
24. Sorokina N. V. Methodological approaches to assessing the level of development of social infrastructure and provision of the territory with its facilities // Materials of the XIII International Student scientific Conference “Student Scientific Forum” [Materialy XIII Mezhdunarodnoj studencheskoj nauchnoj konferencii “Studencheskij nauchnyj forum”]. (In Russ.)
25. Sorokin S. V. A favorable institutional environment as the basis for the development of innovative activities // Bulletin of the University (Russian-Tajik (Slavic) University) [Vestnik universiteta (Rossijsko-Tadzhikskij (Slavyanskij) universitet)]. 2023. N 1 (79). P. 90–103. (In Russ.)
26. Sok A. V. Rating of social infrastructure provision as a method of comparative assessment of municipalities (on the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan) // Municipality: economics and management [Municipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2022. N 2 (39). P. 85–96. (In Russ.)
27. Tregubov K. V. Investment environment in Russia: assessment and problems // Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University [Uchenye zapiski Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo social’nogo universiteta]. 2009. N 11 (74). P. 286–291. (In Russ.)
28. Uzhegov A. O. Diagnostics of the conditions of technological development of industrial regions of the Russian Federation: methodological approaches // Problems of territorial development [Problemy razvitiya territorii]. 2023. V. 27. N 5. P. 96–114. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.5.127.7
Review
For citations:
Nevyantseva L.S. Assessment of the Quality of the Regional Investment Environment in the Context of Ensuring the Technological Sovereignty of the Economy. Administrative Consulting. 2024;(4):86-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-4-86-103. EDN: OFEAON