Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Methodological Issues in Shadow Economy Estimation

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-6-42-62

EDN: WISFOA

Abstract

The study covers an analysis of Rosstat’s methodology and data on Russia’s “shadow economy”. We explore potential shortcomings in the interpretation of three groups of indicators: adjustments for economic operations not observed by direct methods; unrecorded wage payments; employment in the informal sector and unregistered/undocumented employment. The economy unobserved by direct statistical methods and unregulated covers a significant part of the country’s economic life. The official statistical calculations of the American system of national accounts during the Great Depression reflect the need for adequate, complete, and harmonized estimates of shadow activities. Using archival data and microdata from Rosstat surveys, we show that discrepancies in revisions (vintages) of official estimates can lead to significant divergences, reaching tens of percentage points of GDP. The adjustments to gross value added used by Rosstat, without a synchronous analysis of national accounts, do not meet the goals of comparability and harmonization. Estimates of unrecorded wage payments are extremely limited in terms of explanatory and prognostic value. Finally, the estimates of informal employment proposed by the statistical agency virtually fully correspond to estimates of employment in the informal sector. The latter, in turn, do not reflect the nature of the shadow employment economy, as they rely on the production criterion. As we believe, the less popular in the literature estimates of undocumented employment and/or unregistered self-employment are more suitable for assessing the dynamics and structure of shadow practices in Russian employment. The use of such estimates is complicated by the closed nature of labor force survey materials. Thus, Rosstat holds non-public estimates of the number of employees whose employers evade taxes and contributions, as well as data on the number of self-employed individuals engaged in unregistered entrepreneurial activities, but does not publish this information. We emphasize the need to develop a unified approach to enhance the harmonization and comparability of both national and international statistics.

About the Authors

E. V. Pecheritsa
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Elena V. Pecheritsa, Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Security at the Faculty of Business, Customs Affairs, and Economic Security, Candidate of Sociological Sciences, assistant professor

Saint Petersburg



D. M. Orobchenko
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Daniil M. Orobchenko, postgraduate student of the Department of Economic Security at the Faculty of Business, Customs Affairs, and Economic Security

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Abroskin A. S., Abroskina N. A. Methodology and Practice of Measuring Shadow Activity in the Economy of the Russian Federation. Moscow : Delo, 2021. 107 p. (In Russ.)

2. Burova N. V. On Studying Shadow and Illegal Activities Abroad // Voprosy statistiki. 2006. N 6. P. 14–20. (In Russ.)

3. Veredyuk O. V. Informal employment: structure and risk determinants in Russia // St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Economics.] 2016. N 4. P. 33–48. (In Russ.)

4. Vorob’eva O. D., Topilin A. V., Chukhnin V. S. On Approaches to the Definition of Hidden Employment (Based on Labour Force Balances for 2015) // Voprosy statistiki. 2018. Vol. 25. N 8. P. 36–42. (In Russ.)

5. Gimpelson V. E., Glissin F. F., Zharova A. I. Issues of Quantitative Assessment of Indicators of Unobservable Economy in Russia. Moscow : TEIS, 2003. 175 p. (In Russ.)

6. Eliseeva I. I., Shirina A. N., Kapralova E. B. Measuring Shadow Economic Activities. Saint Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance. Department of Statistics and Econometrics. Saint Petersburg : Publishing House of SPbSUEF, 2003. 269 p. (In Russ.)

7. Zaitseva Yu. S. Gross Regional Product: What and How We Measure // ECO. 2012. N 4. P. 86–103. (In Russ.)

8. Zubarevich N. V. “Deceptive Figures” on the Map of the Homeland // ECO. 2012. N 4. P. 74–85. (In Russ.)

9. Ivanov Yu. On the issue of including the assessment of illegal activity into the GDP // Voprosy statistiki. 2014. N 3. P. 46–48. (In Russ.)

10. Measuring the Non-Observed Economy: A Handbook, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi. org/10.1787/9789264175358-en.

11. Karaseva V. L., Alexeev A. R. On Estimates of Illegal Activities Based on the Concepts of the System of National Accounts // Voprosy statistiki. 2006. N 1. P. 3–18. (In Russ.)

12. Krasnova O. M. Gross Regional Product as a Macroeconomic Measure of Regional Economy // Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan. 2016. N 2. P. 22–29. (In Russ.)

13. Levit S. Non-observed economy: practice, issues and improvement directions for its measurement // Voprosy statistiki. 2014. N 6. P. 20–23. (In Russ.)

14. Masakova I. D., Ulyanov I. S. et al. Total Production Volume (Works, Services) by Economic Sectors Considering Hidden and Informal Activities // Methodological Provisions on Statistics. Is. 2. Moscow : Moscow Publishing House, et al., 1998. 244 p. (In Russ.)

15. Nevzorova E. N. Spatial Interactions and Patterns of Shadow Economy Spread in Russia // Economy of the Region. 2020. Vol. 16. N 2. P. 464–478. (In Russ.)

16. Pecheritsa E. V., Nadezhina O. S., Golovkina S. I. Theoretical Approaches to Defining the Shadow Economy // Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 19. N 12 (495). P. 2325–2344. (In Russ.)

17. Counteracting the Shadow Economy and Determining its Scale: Domestic and Foreign Experience (Theory and Practice). Chita, 2020. 337 p. (In Russ.)

18. Ryabushkin B. T. Methods of Estimating the Shadow and Informal Sectors of the Economy. Moscow : Finance and Statistics, 2003. 144 p. (In Russ.)

19. Samsonov V. A., Seitov S. K. Assessment of the contribution of the shadow economy to the macroeconomic indicators of the regions of the Russian Federation // Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2022. Vol. 14. N 1 (43). P. 68–85. (In Russ.)

20. Skvoznikov V. Ya., Azarenkova N. V. Problems of Assessing the Shadow Economy // Voprosy statistiki. 2001. N 12. P. 18–22. (In Russ.)

21. Skokov R. Yu. Development of the methodology for statistical analysis of markets for addictive goods // Voprosy statistiki. 2016. N 5. P. 63–69. (In Russ.)

22. Social Development of the USSR: Stat. collection / State Committee of the USSR for Statistics, Information and Publishing Center. Moscow : Finance and Statistics, 1990. 398 p. (In Russ.)

23. Statistics of the CIS. Statistical Bulletin of the Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). N 1 (569), 2023. (In Russ.)

24. Surinov A. E., Kosarev A. E., Glissin F. F. Unobservable Economy: An Attempt at Quantitative Measurements. Moscow : Finstatinform, 2003. 256 p. (In Russ.)

25. Tsepelev O. A., Serikov S. G., Kolesnikova O. S., Kakaulina M. O. Unobservable Economy: Regional Aspect. Moscow : Science, 2021. 110 p. (In Russ.)

26. Cheremisina N. V. Unobservable Economy of the Region: Methodological Problems of Statistical Measurement: Monograph. Samara : Samara State Economic University, 2006. 303 p. (In Russ.)

27. Carson C. S. The Underground Economy: An Introduction // Survey of current business. 1984. Vol. 64. N 5. Р. 21–37.

28. Carson C. S. The Underground Economy: An An Introduction (end) // Survey of current business. 1984. Vol. 64. N 7. Р. 106–119.

29. Fernandes A. The non-observed economy in the national accounts //A. Fernandes. HIVAKULeuven. 2022. 54 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://hiva.kuleuven.be/en/news/docs/working-paper-the-non-observed-economy-in-the.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2024).

30. Gutmann P. M. The Subterranean Economy // Financial Analysts Journal. 1977. Vol. 33. N 6. Р. 26–27.

31. Kuznets S., National Bureau of Economic Research, United States. Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, and United States. Congress. Senate. National Income, 1929–1932. Washington, D. C. : U. S. Government Printing Office, 1934 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/971 (accessed: 20.01.2024).

32. Soloveichik R. Including illegal activity in the us national economic accounts. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2019 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.bea.gov/index.php/system/files/papers/WP2019-4_6.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2024).

33. Summary of the OECD survey on measuring the non-observed economy //Working Party on National Accounts. OECD, Paris. 2012. 43 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://one.oecd.org/document/STD/CSTAT/WPNA(2012)21/En/pdf (accessed: 20.01.2024).

34. United Nations. UNECE. Non-observed Economy in National Accounts: Survey of National Practices. 2008 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://unece.org/DAM/stats/publications/NOE2008.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2024).


Review

For citations:


Pecheritsa E.V., Orobchenko D.M. Methodological Issues in Shadow Economy Estimation. Administrative Consulting. 2024;(6):42-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-6-42-62. EDN: WISFOA

Views: 150


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)