State Instruments of Protectionism in Russian Industrial Policy: Theory and Practice
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-6-128-136
EDN: ZZFWXI
Abstract
The article examines the specifics and features of protectionism in Russian modern management. Special attention is paid to the tools with which the authorities manage a complex industrial structure. The emphasis is placed on the fact that industrial policy is the most important direction in terms of strategic objectives and in the long term. The traditional theory of protectionism is used as the theoretical basis of the study. The article highlights the fact that, as in any country, in Russia the viability of the industrial production sector plays a crucial role, and its importance in the growth of national production can hardly be overestimated. The objectives of protectionism in Russian industry, which are important for the protection of domestic production, as well as GDP growth, are considered. In addition, the instruments of protectionism stimulate the ability to protect the industrial sector from external factors, thereby reducing the consequences. The concept of protectionism in theoretical discourse is defined from different points of view. But the main point of contact in various definitions is the definition of protectionism as a whole state policy, both in theory and in practice, which restricts imports from other countries by applying international sanctions using various methods. Such methods include import restrictions, quotas and others with the main purpose of protecting local industry by restricting the sale of foreign goods on the market. The purpose of the article is to identify the main methods of state regulation in the industrial sector from the point of view of protectionism tools. The subject of the study is the theoretical and practical foundations of protectionist policy in modern Russia. The methods that were applied in the work will include a theoretical overview, a method of analysis, deduction, generalization. The result of the work are generalizing conclusions describing the most effective ways and directions of Russia’s industrial policy in the context of protectionism, comparing their theoretical foundations with practical application. The article considers several cases that help to identify the problems of modern industrial management policy. Among such obvious problems, it is worth highlighting the insufficient level of orientation to the new driving forces of technological change, the presence of a high degree of separation of the political landscape, and the low level of selection of successful practices.
About the Author
A. A. RashchikovРоссия
Andrey A. Rashchikov, postgraduate student of the Department of Political Analysis and Social-Psychological Processes
Moscow
References
1. Grinberg R. S., Komolov O. O. The policy of protectionism in Russia: new trends in the context of the problem of importing institutions // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2022. Vol. 15. N 2. P. 44–54. (In Russ.)
2. Dzyuba A. N., Balakai O. B. The policy of protectionism and the mechanisms of its implementation // Materials of the International Scientifi Conference of Students and Young Scientists. Dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Donnu. Vol. 7 / ed. by S. V. Bespalova. 2017. P. 26–28. (In Russ.)
3. Zagashvili V. S. Foreign experience of import substitution and possible conclusions for Russia [Electronic resource]. URL: https://institutiones.com/general/2886-zarubezhnyi-opyt-importozamezcheniya.html (accessed: 07.28.2024). (In Russ.)
4. Kamynin V. D., Zapariy V. V. About the “new industrial history” (to raise the question) // History of Science and Engineering. Yekaterinburg. 2019. N 1. P. 96–97. (In Russ.)
5. Kolesnikova T. V. Directions of application of protectionism in Russian economic policy / T. V. Kolesnikova, V. V. Lukashevich, P. N. Sokolova // Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship. 2022. N 10 (147). P. 250–254. (In Russ.)
6. Kogdenko V. G. Transformation of the Russian economic model: signs and indicators // Finance and Credit. Moscow, 2023. Vol. 22. N 3. P. 402–425. (In Russ.)
7. Lenin V. I. The next tasks of Soviet power, 1918 // Lenin V. I. Complete works. Vol. 36. Moscow : Publishing House of Political Literature, 1974. P. 241–280. (In Russ.)
8. List F. The national system of political economy. Chelyabinsk : Socium, 2017. 453 p. (In Russ.)
9. Logvinenko M. V. Approaches to trade policy: liberalism and protectionism on the example of the EAEU activities // Samoupravlenie. Moscow, 2020. Vol. 2. N 1 (118). P. 243–246. (In Russ.)
10. Nagieva A. H. Protectionism in politics S. Y. Witte as Minister of Finance // Student electronic magazine “STRIZH”. Volgograd, 2022. N 3 (44). P. 99–102. (In Russ.)
11. Nemolyaeva A. A. The essence and main features of the protectionism policy // Scientifi research of the XXI century. Lyubertsy. 2023. N 2 (22). P. 147–149. (In Russ.)
12. Political economy [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ru.wikipedia.org/ (accessed: 08.07.2024). (In Russ.)
13. Stragis Yu. P. Underdevelopment of countries and regions: development factors // Collection of reports of young scientists of the XIV International Conference “Russian Regions in the Focus of Change”. Ekaterinburg, 2020. P. 733–734. (In Russ.)
14. Stragis Yu. P. Protectionism as a factor in the development of the national economy // Proceedings of the XIII International Conference “Russian Regions in the Focus of Change”. Yekaterinburg, 2019. P. 343–347. (In Russ.)
15. Amiti M., Redding S. J., Weinstein D. E. The Impact of the Trade war on U. S. Prices and Wealfare // NBER Working Paper N 25672. March 2019. 37 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w25672 (accessed: 28.07.2024). DOI: 10.3386/w25672
16. Aftershock. The Pervasive Eects of Taris Hikes // The Economist Intelligence Unit. London. 2019. 41 p.
17. Baughman L. M., Francois J. F. Trade and American Jobs. The Impact of Trade on U. S. and State-Level Employment. 2019 Update // Trade Partnership Worldwide. February 2019. 24 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://tradepartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Tradeand-American-2019-FINAL.pdf (accessed: 29.07.2024).
18. Fajgelbaum P. D., Goldberg P. K., Kennedy P. J., Khadelwal A. K. The Return to Protectionism // NBER Working paper N 25638. October 2019. 81 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w25638 (accessed: 20.07.2024). DOI: 10.3386/w25638
19. Kuandykova M. B, Omarbakiyev L. A., Nizamdinova A. K. Prices for domestic agricultural products and protectionism as an instrument of state regulation // Problems of agrimarket. 2022. N 3. P. 64–71.
20. Grossman G. M., Helpman E. The politics of free-trade agreements // American Economic Review. July 2022 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=226765 (accessed: 29.07.2024).
21. Protectionism: Examples and Types of Trade Protections // Investopedia. May 2024 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/protectionism.asp (accessed: 29.07.2024).
22. Kopf D. The history of US protectionism, in one 230-year chart // Quartz. March 2018 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://qz.com/1230399/a-history-of-taris-us-protectionism-in-one-230-year-chart/ (accessed: 30.07.2024).
23. World Tariff Profiles 2018 // World Trade Organization [Electronic resource]. URL: https://unc-tad.org/system/files/official-document/wto2018_en.pdf (accessed: 29.07.2024).
24. York E. Tariff Tracker: Tracking the Economic Impact of the Trump-Biden Tariff // Tax Foundation. June 2024 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-biden-tariffs (accessed: 20.07.2024).
Review
For citations:
Rashchikov A.A. State Instruments of Protectionism in Russian Industrial Policy: Theory and Practice. Administrative Consulting. 2024;(6):128-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-6-128-136. EDN: ZZFWXI
JATS XML


































